Kate Middleton in Hospital - Recovering from Surgery

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of theories in comments at FT

What is ft?

Financial Times, but this is usually requires a subscription

do tell. what do they think?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of theories in comments at FT

What is ft?

Financial Times, but this is usually requires a subscription

Financial Times has a hopping comments section for Royal news? Interesting!

I went looking on FT and can't find this article. Someone send a link?

I'm thinking this must be a DailyMail article.

That said, the FT does have a really good comments sections. Lots of smart people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is most certainly Crohn's

Hope she does well after, I have relatives with Crohn's and it is such a pain in the a** disease that lowers life quality

[Anonymous]

Transplant?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is most certainly Crohn's

Hope she does well after, I have relatives with Crohn's and it is such a pain in the a** disease that lowers life quality

Interesting if it's that, since so many people accuse her of having an eating disorder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is most certainly Crohn's

Hope she does well after, I have relatives with Crohn's and it is such a pain in the a** disease that lowers life quality

Interesting if it's that, since so many people accuse her of having an eating disorder.

Issues with appetite and not being able to gain weight are very common with Crohn’s.

[Anonymous]

I wonder if it's a multi stage surgery making it easier to stay in the hospital.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is most certainly Crohn's

Hope she does well after, I have relatives with Crohn's and it is such a pain in the a** disease that lowers life quality

My friend's son has Crohn's. He's really struggling. Had to take a semester off of college to prioritize his health.

[Anonymous]

You don’t need 16 days for a hysterectomy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You don’t need 16 days for a hysterectomy

You can if it’s complicated.

My friend had terrible fibroids that had tangled with her other organs. It was 13 days in the hospital and she needed two different surgeries. Was at home for five weeks afterwards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You don’t need 16 days for a hysterectomy

You can if it’s complicated.

My friend had terrible fibroids that had tangled with her other organs. It was 13 days in the hospital and she needed two different surgeries. Was at home for five weeks afterwards.

Someone earlier said the hospital she's in doesn't do gyno stuff. I think it's digestive.

[Anonymous]

It's not a hysterectomy. London Clinic doesn't do those. Eating Disorder damage speculation is silly. This sort of damage is normally due to bulimia, which doesn't actually typically lead to weight loss, and if she had an eating disorder serious enough to cause intestinal damage, there is basically zero chance she would have been able to get pregnant with 3 kids so easily. On top of that, lots of other conditions can cause the same damage, so they wouldn't have to disclose either way.

It's obviously either Crohn's or UC and I'm sure it's a condition that she's known about for ages that suddenly flared. It could also be a bowel perf, but those usually are emergency surgeries. A serious adhesion could also do it, but I don't think she's had abdominal surgery before, so that would make it less likely. (Also, they wouldn't have known it wasn't cancer for sure pre-surgery, but because they didn't put out the release until afterwards, it's possible.)

[Anonymous]

For a 2 week Chon's hospital stay, assume bowel reaction(s)?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is most certainly Crohn's

Hope she does well after, I have relatives with Crohn's and it is such a pain in the a** disease that lowers life quality

Interesting if it's that, since so many people accuse her of having an eating disorder.

+1. They are mean people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's not a hysterectomy. London Clinic doesn't do those. Eating Disorder damage speculation is silly. This sort of damage is normally due to bulimia, which doesn't actually typically lead to weight loss, and if she had an eating disorder serious enough to cause intestinal damage, there is basically zero chance she would have been able to get pregnant with 3 kids so easily. On top of that, lots of other conditions can cause the same damage, so they wouldn't have to disclose either way.

It's obviously either Crohn's or UC and I'm sure it's a condition that she's known about for ages that suddenly flared. It could also be a bowel perf, but those usually are emergency surgeries. A serious adhesion could also do it, but I don't think she's had abdominal surgery before, so that would make it less likely. (Also, they wouldn't have known it wasn't cancer for sure pre-surgery, but because they didn't put out the release until afterwards, it's possible.)

This, exactly!