Kate Middleton's legs!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Legs look amazing! I give major props to this look because her legs are generally her worst feature. She's very tall but built like a corgi with a long torso and comparatively stout legs. A+ on looking at all "leggy"

If these amazing legs are what you consider "comparatively stout," sign me up! Her legs are one of her *best* features and she is indeed, leggy.

+1 Somehow that PP must be looking at someone else's legs. Her legs are very long and not at all stout.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP:

Her name is The Princess of Wales, not Kate Middleton. Show some respect.

Princess Diana was often just referred to as “Diana.” Prince William is often simply called “William.” And, gasp, King Charles is often just called “Charles.”

+1

I see no reason to use the colonial titles for humans who live in countries that amassed wealth by conquering other nations.
Diana was Diana. The people's princess, they said. Kate is the daughter of people who ran a company into the ground and got their daughters married off to rich people. Nothing more. Nothing less.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Legs look amazing! I give major props to this look because her legs are generally her worst feature. She's very tall but built like a corgi with a long torso and comparatively stout legs. A+ on looking at all "leggy"

If these amazing legs are what you consider "comparatively stout," sign me up! Her legs are one of her *best* features and she is indeed, leggy.

+1 Somehow that PP must be looking at someone else's legs. Her legs are very long and not at all stout.

I thought the royal women were supposed to have weighted hems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Legs look amazing! I give major props to this look because her legs are generally her worst feature. She's very tall but built like a corgi with a long torso and comparatively stout legs. A+ on looking at all "leggy"

If these amazing legs are what you consider "comparatively stout," sign me up! Her legs are one of her *best* features and she is indeed, leggy.

+1 Somehow that PP must be looking at someone else's legs. Her legs are very long and not at all stout.

I thought the royal women were supposed to have weighted hems.

It's 2023, dear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Legs look amazing! I give major props to this look because her legs are generally her worst feature. She's very tall but built like a corgi with a long torso and comparatively stout legs. A+ on looking at all "leggy"

If these amazing legs are what you consider "comparatively stout," sign me up! Her legs are one of her *best* features and she is indeed, leggy.

+1 Somehow that PP must be looking at someone else's legs. Her legs are very long and not at all stout.

I thought the royal women were supposed to have weighted hems.

It's 2023, dear.

Showing your underwear in public is still déclassé, 2023 or not.

[Anonymous]

I can’t believe that people give this much thought and reverence to other humans they don’t even know and who could care less about them.

BRF groupies are truly in a very sad league of their own.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe that people give this much thought and reverence to other humans they don’t even know and who could care less about them.

BRF groupies are truly in a very sad league of their own.

Yeah I totally don’t get it! It’s fun to see the over the top weddings every ten years but other than that? No thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP:

Her name is The Princess of Wales, not Kate Middleton. Show some respect.

This is dumb af. Charles and Camilla are frequently referred to by their first names and outrank her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Legs look amazing! I give major props to this look because her legs are generally her worst feature. She's very tall but built like a corgi with a long torso and comparatively stout legs. A+ on looking at all "leggy"

If these amazing legs are what you consider "comparatively stout," sign me up! Her legs are one of her *best* features and she is indeed, leggy.

+1 Somehow that PP must be looking at someone else's legs. Her legs are very long and not at all stout.

I thought the royal women were supposed to have weighted hems.

It's 2023, dear.

Showing your underwear in public is still déclassé, 2023 or not.

Oh, give it up. Your trolling is what's déclassé.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe that people give this much thought and reverence to other humans they don’t even know and who could care less about them.

BRF groupies are truly in a very sad league of their own.

Tell us about all the other threads you comment on - you know, people you don't know and who could care less about you. And maybe stop trolling threads that "hold no interest" for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Legs look amazing! I give major props to this look because her legs are generally her worst feature. She's very tall but built like a corgi with a long torso and comparatively stout legs. A+ on looking at all "leggy"

If these amazing legs are what you consider "comparatively stout," sign me up! Her legs are one of her *best* features and she is indeed, leggy.

+1 Somehow that PP must be looking at someone else's legs. Her legs are very long and not at all stout.

I thought the royal women were supposed to have weighted hems.

It's 2023, dear.

Showing your underwear in public is still déclassé, 2023 or not.

Where? Show me the pics of her showing underwear. If you don’t have it, shut up!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Legs look amazing! I give major props to this look because her legs are generally her worst feature. She's very tall but built like a corgi with a long torso and comparatively stout legs. A+ on looking at all "leggy"

If these amazing legs are what you consider "comparatively stout," sign me up! Her legs are one of her *best* features and she is indeed, leggy.

+1 Somehow that PP must be looking at someone else's legs. Her legs are very long and not at all stout.

I thought the royal women were supposed to have weighted hems.

It's 2023, dear.

Showing your underwear in public is still déclassé, 2023 or not.

Where? Show me the pics of her showing underwear. If you don’t have it, shut up!!

+1
Report the trolls who can't stand any positive thread about Kate Middleton.

[Anonymous]

Her legs are too skinny.

[Anonymous]

Y’all take this lady so seriously! You’re more than welcome to obsess over a European princess but you can’t expect all Americans to share your interest. The British royals just aren’t culturally relevant here so lots of posters will poke fun.

[Anonymous]

I don’t get it all of the positive things people say about her you could literally say about one of William’s polo ponies. She loves her kids, she has nice hair, she’s loyal to William, etc. there’s no there there.