Personal theories that may or may not be based on facts

[Anonymous]

Direct correlation between the obesity epidemic in the US and three things 1) processed food, 2) Starbucks and 3) open concept floor plans where the kitchen and family room are in the same shared space.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People who have destination weddings don’t actually want to get married, so they have to turn it into a trip

This is a good one. I’d be interested in some statistical analysis comparing destination wedding and divorce to local wedding and divorce and length of time between wedding and divorce.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m like the anti-vaxxer of sun screen. I can’t wrap my head around the fact that wearing SPF daily is the answer to preventing aging and skin cancer. Is smearing chemicals on our face really healthier for us than natural sunlight? All the research seems to say yes, but I just can’t get on board with this and kind of thing sunscreen is a scam. I also think sunscreen is destroying our reefs.

I often forget to wear sunscreen or apply it to my children. None of us burn.
We all need lots Vitamin D to function well.
And yes, it is chemicals that are not great for you and terrible for the environment.

I think it’s all genetic. I am blonde hair blue eyed and have to be in the sun for a long time before I burn. My husband is also fair, blue eyed but not blonde and will burn super easily.

[Anonymous]

I am the mother of identical twins. When they were young, I belonged to a MOT group.
All of us with identicals were tall, broad shouldered, big chested but thin legs. There's something there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My friend has never been able to tolerate tomatoes and says she feels sick from GMO foods. Her theory is that a lot of the GMO genes are from the tomato genome. I know that gene splicing is now used but I wonder if she has a point.

She's a drama queen. Have you seen how we have modified carrots and watermelons to their modern versions? Is she sick from everything?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People who have destination weddings don’t actually want to get married, so they have to turn it into a trip

I think that most of the ones I've met want to get married, but they don't want to pay for the wedding. With a destination wedding, the guests generally pay more and the couple pays less.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who have destination weddings don’t actually want to get married, so they have to turn it into a trip

I think that most of the ones I've met want to get married, but they don't want to pay for the wedding. With a destination wedding, the guests generally pay more and the couple pays less.

This is what I think it is. Don’t want people to actually come, don’t want to accommodate guests as much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who have destination weddings don’t actually want to get married, so they have to turn it into a trip

I think that most of the ones I've met want to get married, but they don't want to pay for the wedding. With a destination wedding, the guests generally pay more and the couple pays less.

This is what I think it is. Don’t want people to actually come, don’t want to accommodate guests as much.

+1 And I'm fine with this approach, but I decline the invitations. It would have to be a very close relative or a BFF for me to spend thousands of dollars to go. As long as the couple doesn't pressure people to go, let them have at it.

[Anonymous]

I 100% believe that thoughts create reality.

Re some of the theories shared here:

1. I married someone with ADHD and he’s tons of fun, amazing sex. Life has never been boring.

2. We def had a destination wedding to avoid having guests LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am the mother of identical twins. When they were young, I belonged to a MOT group.
All of us with identicals were tall, broad shouldered, big chested but thin legs. There's something there.

Did you conceive through fertility treatments?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My friend has never been able to tolerate tomatoes and says she feels sick from GMO foods. Her theory is that a lot of the GMO genes are from the tomato genome. I know that gene splicing is now used but I wonder if she has a point.

I totally think the increase in food allergies is related to this kind of thing - not just GMO foods, but other changes we've made to crops to make them more resilient have contributed to allergies (aside from also higher levels of detection and specificity that we have now).

[Anonymous]

I don't believe that most older people have dementia or Alzheimers. There is no test to validate diagnosis. I think the medical community knows this but participates in selling this illness as much more pervasive than it is b/c it makes a lot of money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Direct correlation between the obesity epidemic in the US and three things 1) processed food, 2) Starbucks and 3) open concept floor plans where the kitchen and family room are in the same shared space.

McMansions, too. People feel too small in their oversized houses with oversized furniture, and, oh hey, the kitchen’s right there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't believe that most older people have dementia or Alzheimers. There is no test to validate diagnosis. I think the medical community knows this but participates in selling this illness as much more pervasive than it is b/c it makes a lot of money.

How does dementia make money?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My theory is that most teens would revert back to traditional sexuality at some point of their parents didn’t actively support and validate their gender and sexual orientation experiments.

The far left parents are just bonkers with making their boys wear dresses but the magat parents are just as looney. There's this one puerto rican magat ughh so gross.

+1 She's a nut job

I’m not saying she’s not crazy but her children are GIRLS. Wearing typical female clothing.