So here is a summary of your tldr post Let me state the facts blah blah blah I don't know anything I'm NOT stating this as a fact. |
It's not facts, it's her conjecture. She even says "I don't know anything so I'm not stating this as fact." |
I agree rich kids are a-holes in general and they get themselves in bad situation they can't get out of without parents and lawyers. But kids make mistakes, get over their heads then tell their parents a fake story. They will definitely learn to stop doing that hopefully before they get to college. |
"feel the need to provide some actual facts" *proceeds to provide lots of non-actual non-facts* |
What fake story are you convinced the WJ kids are telling and why do you believe that to be the case? Especially since they're saying the B-CC kids had ski masks on and there were robberies and property damage, so clearly there was premeditation on their part. |
I think PP meant they didn't know anything about the law/whether these minors can face criminal charges. Not that they didn't know any facts about what happened that night. |
|
I can't speak directly of the Maryland law. That is what I said I could not state as fact, but this could/should be easily researched. Could I have done it and should I have, yes. But I'm tired.
The rest is fact. How do I know what happened? I just do and I truly wish I didn't. Infer from that what you want. It's funny...people just want to believe what they want to believe to fit the best narrative for them. No one can be wrong or open to information. I'm not sure what anyone has to gain or loose here by arguing their side they believe to be true. If you want WJ students to be part of the criminal activity, no amount of evidence will disprove what you want to believe. If you want this to be a fight and not assault, no amount proof is going to dissuade you. If you want this to be entitled rich kids getting what they deserve, no amount of proof will dissuade you. If you want this to be a school rivalry football bad athlete issue, then again, nothing anyone says with actual knowledge will change your mind. And so the pages of comments go on. Good luck out there all. We need it. Next argument topic - grass is green |
|
"It's not facts, it's her conjecture. She even says "I don't know anything so I'm not stating this as fact." "I think PP meant they didn't know anything about the law/whether these minors can face criminal charges. Not that they didn't know any facts about what happened that night." Exactly what I meant. Not the entire summary, just the law. |
It you know this because your own child was victimized, I'm so sorry. I hope the students involved in this assault face consequences, both by MCPS and by law enforcement. - BCC parent |
Are you being sarcastic by repeating the WJ story? |
Yet you continue to provide no facts. Nothing you stated was a fact, it’s all conjecture based on stories told by WJ children. We won’t know facts (probably ever) but we will know more once a police investigation is complete. An arrest isn’t even a fact, an arrest is based on reasonable suspicion… like the boy at Seneca arrested for assault then 4 girl’s admitted to lying to the cops. |
Even if her child was involved it does not mean she knows facts. She only knows the story told to her. |
Okay, I'll restate. I'm sorry for any parent whose child was injured, whether they were willing participants in a fight or assaulted as they were going about their evening. Either way, no one deserves to be beaten and kicked by multiple people while they're down. |
I agree. Assuming the boy was not thrown to the ground and kicked after he attacked someone… he didn’t deserve to be hit and kicked on the ground. |
|
According to this article, crimes of violence, including robbery and first degree assault, can still be charged under Maryland law against children under 13.
https://frizwoods.com/blog/juvenile-law-update-maryland |