13yr old's pediatrician just told her she is overweight and I am pissed

Anonymous
I agree. 151 for 13 is wayyyy to much. A diet is needed here. OP still hasn't discussed what she's feeding her daughter to get to that weight.


I really really hope you don't have kids. You will totally mess them up mentally.

And FYI - my daughter is 5'6' and 139 lbs. She is SLIM and very fit (plays college soccer), and wears a size 27 jean or a 4 or 6 in clothes. Your distorted thinking would say she is overweight, which could not be further from the truth. Maybe educated yourself before disparaging other people, especially a teenager.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Are you literally trying to say that 13 and 151 lbs isn't at all concerning?


Are you literally suggesting that age should be correlated with weight? I know a boy who weighed 170 in 5th grade. Was he overweight? Of course, he was also 5'11' and wore a size 13 shoe. But under your theory that doesn't matter.


Of course age matters when talking about weight. Especially prepuberty vs a few years out from puberty.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Are you literally trying to say that 13 and 151 lbs isn't at all concerning?


Are you literally suggesting that age should be correlated with weight? I know a boy who weighed 170 in 5th grade. Was he overweight? Of course, he was also 5'11' and wore a size 13 shoe. But under your theory that doesn't matter.


DP. Yes. Children and teens don't have their full adult height and weight yet. Age and weight correlate.


Some teens do. I reached 5'5" and 160 when I was 14. I was a bit chunky. With no change or intervention I grew another 5 inches and gained no more weight. This is COMMON among young teen and tween girls.

OP's daughter is active, happy, and healthy. She's absolutely fine.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My 14yr. old son is 5'.10", 135lbs.

I'm 5'4". 135 lbs.

He's fit and slim. I wear size 6 but could lose a few pounds to look my best. I cannot imagine being 150lbs and not worrying. I would listen to the doctors!


You can’t compare a teen boy body composition to a teen girl. And the girl at age 13 may still grow in height.


OPs daughter is 5'5", 150lbs. I'm comparing myself to her. I am not super fit at 135lbs and cannot imagine myself at 150lbs and NOT be worried.


No, You don't get to say these things based on your experience only with yourself. You likely have completely different bone structure and different musculature. Muscle absolutely weighs more than fat.

To the OP: I hear you. Both my daughter and I weigh more than people think and are fit and muscular. Do not listen to the nut-jobs on DCUM. They are speculating with (really) no idea what your daughter actually looks like or her fitness level. They are projecting all their own BS onto you and your daughter.

If you believe the pediatrician is off-base here, find another one.


OMG stop saying this. Repeat it to yourself and listen hard.


Everyone knows what PP means. Muscle tissue is denser than fat. It's true and it makes a difference.


It doesn't make as big a difference as everyone says it makes. But yes it's often the go to line.
Anonymous
Using BMI is so outdated. It's still the metric insurance companies want with well-checks, though.

Better measures of overall health:
1. bloodwork/vitals
2. height-natural waist ratio

Your natural waist is slightly above your belly button. Measure your height (inches) and divide it in half. Your waist measurement should be under that number.

Why is this ratio a better indicator of health? Because the natural waist (mid-section) is where fat naturally collects when you gain weight or are overweight, and mid-section weight is the troublesome kind that causes issues.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
I agree. 151 for 13 is wayyyy to much. A diet is needed here. OP still hasn't discussed what she's feeding her daughter to get to that weight.


I really really hope you don't have kids. You will totally mess them up mentally.

And FYI - my daughter is 5'6' and 139 lbs. She is SLIM and very fit (plays college soccer), and wears a size 27 jean or a 4 or 6 in clothes. Your distorted thinking would say she is overweight, which could not be further from the truth. Maybe educated yourself before disparaging other people, especially a teenager.


5’6” and 139 and 20 (you said college, right?) is very different than 5’5” 151 and 13.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:"Overweight" is not a judgment on your child. It's a clearly defined medical diagnosis. That definition is based on BMI.

You can be "overweight" because you are a highly muscular athlete, or because you are carrying extra fat, or even for other reasons. But "overweight" does not necessarily mean unhealthy. If you treat it that way, you are part of the problem.

- American Academy of Pediatrics Issues Its First Comprehensive Guideline on Evaluating, Treating Children and Adolescents With Obesity
- https://www.aap.org/en/news-room/news-releases/aap/2022/american-academy-of-pediatrics-issues-its-first-comprehensive-guideline-on-evaluating-treating-children-and-adolescents-with-obesity



Well BMI is not for athletes or those with real amount of muscle and the judgement that comes from hearing overweight as a teenage girl are life-altering. So stop using flawed metrics and then making judgements and treatment. Refer for a DEXA if you are really that concerned.


BMI is for athletes. It just doesn't mean what you think it means.


Okay well when one person has a BMI of 25 and is 5'5 at 150 with 120 lbs of muscle (20% BF active, etc) bvs 90lbs of muscle (40% bf) there is a difference. And yet that number (BMI) is somehow used as reasoning for X,Y, Z.


A 13 year old is different than a person who is in their 20s or 40s. A 13 year old's weight will likely only go up. OP's DD is already disadvantaged.


A 13yr old is not even close to done growing. Most girls get a little thicker before their first and final growth spurt. So stop comparing to 20 and 40 year olds. And a 5'5" girl that is 150 is not fat.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I’m confused is she 5 foot and 2 1/2 inches or 5 foot 5 1/2 inches?

150 at 5 ft 2 is high for a 13 year old teen

Not sure if that’s a super high BMI for 5”5-5”6.


The OP said like 4 comments down from the first post that she made a typo. She is 65.25 inches tall.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My 14yr. old son is 5'.10", 135lbs.

I'm 5'4". 135 lbs.

He's fit and slim. I wear size 6 but could lose a few pounds to look my best. I cannot imagine being 150lbs and not worrying. I would listen to the doctors!


You can’t compare a teen boy body composition to a teen girl. And the girl at age 13 may still grow in height.


OPs daughter is 5'5", 150lbs. I'm comparing myself to her. I am not super fit at 135lbs and cannot imagine myself at 150lbs and NOT be worried.


No, You don't get to say these things based on your experience only with yourself. You likely have completely different bone structure and different musculature. Muscle absolutely weighs more than fat.

To the OP: I hear you. Both my daughter and I weigh more than people think and are fit and muscular. Do not listen to the nut-jobs on DCUM. They are speculating with (really) no idea what your daughter actually looks like or her fitness level. They are projecting all their own BS onto you and your daughter.

If you believe the pediatrician is off-base here, find another one.


OMG stop saying this. Repeat it to yourself and listen hard.


Everyone knows what PP means. Muscle tissue is denser than fat. It's true and it makes a difference.


It doesn't make as big a difference as everyone says it makes. But yes it's often the go to line.


It actually makes a huge difference LOL
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My 14yr. old son is 5'.10", 135lbs.

I'm 5'4". 135 lbs.

He's fit and slim. I wear size 6 but could lose a few pounds to look my best. I cannot imagine being 150lbs and not worrying. I would listen to the doctors!


You can’t compare a teen boy body composition to a teen girl. And the girl at age 13 may still grow in height.


OPs daughter is 5'5", 150lbs. I'm comparing myself to her. I am not super fit at 135lbs and cannot imagine myself at 150lbs and NOT be worried.


No, You don't get to say these things based on your experience only with yourself. You likely have completely different bone structure and different musculature. Muscle absolutely weighs more than fat.

To the OP: I hear you. Both my daughter and I weigh more than people think and are fit and muscular. Do not listen to the nut-jobs on DCUM. They are speculating with (really) no idea what your daughter actually looks like or her fitness level. They are projecting all their own BS onto you and your daughter.

If you believe the pediatrician is off-base here, find another one.


OMG stop saying this. Repeat it to yourself and listen hard.


Everyone knows what PP means. Muscle tissue is denser than fat. It's true and it makes a difference.


It doesn't make as big a difference as everyone says it makes. But yes it's often the go to line.


Of course it makes a big difference. You should probably stop commenting. . . . And not work with teens. My good friend in HS was severely anorexic and it's because dumb fuXX like you called here athletic swimmer build fat. She wasn't.
Anonymous
I don't think the doctor should have spoken to her without speaking to you first and I think you should tell them that.

However, I think you are kidding yourself a bit here if you are thinking it's not an issue that will come up. If you have the resources maybe look for a sports medicine doctor or someone that looks beyond BMI. The sad and depressing fact is that being overweight/obese (not that your daughter is obese!) when you are young makes it harder to maintain a healthy weight as an adult. According to the CDC BMI chart your daughter is in the range for obesity.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don't think the doctor should have spoken to her without speaking to you first and I think you should tell them that.

However, I think you are kidding yourself a bit here if you are thinking it's not an issue that will come up. If you have the resources maybe look for a sports medicine doctor or someone that looks beyond BMI. The sad and depressing fact is that being overweight/obese (not that your daughter is obese!) when you are young makes it harder to maintain a healthy weight as an adult. According to the CDC BMI chart your daughter is in the range for obesity.


^^Didn't see OP's update that the height was off.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don't think the doctor should have spoken to her without speaking to you first and I think you should tell them that.

However, I think you are kidding yourself a bit here if you are thinking it's not an issue that will come up. If you have the resources maybe look for a sports medicine doctor or someone that looks beyond BMI. The sad and depressing fact is that being overweight/obese (not that your daughter is obese!) when you are young makes it harder to maintain a healthy weight as an adult. According to the CDC BMI chart your daughter is in the range for obesity.


5-5 and 151 lbs is BARELY in the BMI overweight category. Like literally, one tenth of one percent into the overweight BMI.
Anonymous
OP, just wait for your doctor's office to bill you for that talk since it's generally not covered under a well child visit. That happened with my DD. The doctor mentioned her weight, coded that and then we got a bill for $20 since insurance doesn't cover weight discussion!!!!! Made me insane. In our case, my DD was a chubby 10 year old. She's now considered underweight because she's 5'3 and 110 so I am sure I'll get billed extra for a eating disorder talk.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Are you literally trying to say that 13 and 151 lbs isn't at all concerning?


Are you literally suggesting that age should be correlated with weight? I know a boy who weighed 170 in 5th grade. Was he overweight? Of course, he was also 5'11' and wore a size 13 shoe. But under your theory that doesn't matter.


DP. Yes. Children and teens don't have their full adult height and weight yet. Age and weight correlate.


Some teens do. I reached 5'5" and 160 when I was 14. I was a bit chunky. With no change or intervention I grew another 5 inches and gained no more weight. This is COMMON among young teen and tween girls.

OP's daughter is active, happy, and healthy. She's absolutely fine.


It's probably not common for a girl to grow 5 inches after age 14, ending up at 5 ft 10 in.
Forum Index » Tweens and Teens
Go to: