Katherine Schwarzenegger Pratt’s Picture-Perfect Life

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we ask Jeff where the pro-Katherine posts are coming from?

I think it’s just one really sad Katherine stan

What on earth would compel someone to be a Katherine Stan

Maybe it’s a relative. She definitely has some relatives in the area.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really drives the bitter malcontent wannabe girl bosses here nuts when an idle woman is pretty, skinny, rich, married, with kids — and devout. Clutch the pearls - she CAN’T be perfect. Or maybe she is and it makes you jealous as hell.

Nope, none of us need her advice, that's what we are mocking.

Pretty can be made with enough money.
Skinny can be made with enough money.
Rich = money.
Married= is it really a good deal unless you have money?
Kids= made way easier with money
Devout= I personally believe religious indoctrination-especially evangelical- is the main source of evil in this world so nope not interested in her opinions

That fact that she thinks she has something original to say when her entire existence is because of mommy and daddy money.....she is just a snake-oil columnist.

Judging by the photo posted, pretty cannot he made with enough money.

PP that posted the photo - I posted it because I actually think she IS pretty and I've seen a lot of photos of her looking much better. I feel like this photo was another dig at her.

She’s classically gorgeous. And it’s obvious the bitter hags in this thread are jealous of that fact, along with her rich husband, beautiful children, and her commitment to her faith.

Gorgeous? Come on now. She's blandly pleasant looking and cute at best in a very dime a dozen way. She's not turning heads on the street.

And you are? You’re all seething in this thread because you’re jealous of everything she has and everything she represents. Because she didn’t go to college for 8 years and get an pointless frequent flier email job like y’all, and in the end she bagged a filthy rich husband and has a gorgeous all-American family. It stings.

I think the only person envious of her is you. All the rest of us are unimpressed.

If she and Chris and two adorable kids walk into a random suburban restaurant heads will turn. They’re a very attractive family. People have eyes.

No. They are normal looking white people.

+100
Chris whole career started because he looked like the average shlubby white guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really drives the bitter malcontent wannabe girl bosses here nuts when an idle woman is pretty, skinny, rich, married, with kids — and devout. Clutch the pearls - she CAN’T be perfect. Or maybe she is and it makes you jealous as hell.

Nope, none of us need her advice, that's what we are mocking.

Pretty can be made with enough money.
Skinny can be made with enough money.
Rich = money.
Married= is it really a good deal unless you have money?
Kids= made way easier with money
Devout= I personally believe religious indoctrination-especially evangelical- is the main source of evil in this world so nope not interested in her opinions

That fact that she thinks she has something original to say when her entire existence is because of mommy and daddy money.....she is just a snake-oil columnist.

Judging by the photo posted, pretty cannot he made with enough money.

PP that posted the photo - I posted it because I actually think she IS pretty and I've seen a lot of photos of her looking much better. I feel like this photo was another dig at her.

She’s classically gorgeous. And it’s obvious the bitter hags in this thread are jealous of that fact, along with her rich husband, beautiful children, and her commitment to her faith.

Gorgeous? Come on now. She's blandly pleasant looking and cute at best in a very dime a dozen way. She's not turning heads on the street.

And you are? You’re all seething in this thread because you’re jealous of everything she has and everything she represents. Because she didn’t go to college for 8 years and get an pointless frequent flier email job like y’all, and in the end she bagged a filthy rich husband and has a gorgeous all-American family. It stings.

Oh good, aunt Lydia has rejoined the thread after all her initial posts were removed. Blessed be the fruit, dear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really drives the bitter malcontent wannabe girl bosses here nuts when an idle woman is pretty, skinny, rich, married, with kids — and devout. Clutch the pearls - she CAN’T be perfect. Or maybe she is and it makes you jealous as hell.

Nope, none of us need her advice, that's what we are mocking.

Pretty can be made with enough money.
Skinny can be made with enough money.
Rich = money.
Married= is it really a good deal unless you have money?
Kids= made way easier with money
Devout= I personally believe religious indoctrination-especially evangelical- is the main source of evil in this world so nope not interested in her opinions

That fact that she thinks she has something original to say when her entire existence is because of mommy and daddy money.....she is just a snake-oil columnist.

Judging by the photo posted, pretty cannot he made with enough money.

PP that posted the photo - I posted it because I actually think she IS pretty and I've seen a lot of photos of her looking much better. I feel like this photo was another dig at her.

She’s classically gorgeous. And it’s obvious the bitter hags in this thread are jealous of that fact, along with her rich husband, beautiful children, and her commitment to her faith.

Gorgeous? Come on now. She's blandly pleasant looking and cute at best in a very dime a dozen way. She's not turning heads on the street.

And you are? You’re all seething in this thread because you’re jealous of everything she has and everything she represents. Because she didn’t go to college for 8 years and get an pointless frequent flier email job like y’all, and in the end she bagged a filthy rich husband and has a gorgeous all-American family. It stings.

Oh good, aunt Lydia has rejoined the thread after all her initial posts were removed. Blessed be the fruit, dear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really drives the bitter malcontent wannabe girl bosses here nuts when an idle woman is pretty, skinny, rich, married, with kids — and devout. Clutch the pearls - she CAN’T be perfect. Or maybe she is and it makes you jealous as hell.

Nope, none of us need her advice, that's what we are mocking.

Pretty can be made with enough money.
Skinny can be made with enough money.
Rich = money.
Married= is it really a good deal unless you have money?
Kids= made way easier with money
Devout= I personally believe religious indoctrination-especially evangelical- is the main source of evil in this world so nope not interested in her opinions

That fact that she thinks she has something original to say when her entire existence is because of mommy and daddy money.....she is just a snake-oil columnist.

Judging by the photo posted, pretty cannot he made with enough money.

PP that posted the photo - I posted it because I actually think she IS pretty and I've seen a lot of photos of her looking much better. I feel like this photo was another dig at her.

She’s classically gorgeous. And it’s obvious the bitter hags in this thread are jealous of that fact, along with her rich husband, beautiful children, and her commitment to her faith.

Gorgeous? Come on now. She's blandly pleasant looking and cute at best in a very dime a dozen way. She's not turning heads on the street.

And you are? You’re all seething in this thread because you’re jealous of everything she has and everything she represents. Because she didn’t go to college for 8 years and get an pointless frequent flier email job like y’all, and in the end she bagged a filthy rich husband and has a gorgeous all-American family. It stings.

I think the only person envious of her is you. All the rest of us are unimpressed.

If she and Chris and two adorable kids walk into a random suburban restaurant heads will turn. They’re a very attractive family. People have eyes.

No. They are normal looking white people.

+100
Chris whole career started because he looked like the average shlubby white guy.

But he was so funny as a dumb schlubby dude

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we ask Jeff where the pro-Katherine posts are coming from?

I think it’s just one really sad Katherine stan

What on earth would compel someone to be a Katherine Stan

What on Earth would compel a gaggle of old bags to spend a week cyber-bullying a non-famous stay at home young Christian mother?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really drives the bitter malcontent wannabe girl bosses here nuts when an idle woman is pretty, skinny, rich, married, with kids — and devout. Clutch the pearls - she CAN’T be perfect. Or maybe she is and it makes you jealous as hell.

Nope, none of us need her advice, that's what we are mocking.

Pretty can be made with enough money.
Skinny can be made with enough money.
Rich = money.
Married= is it really a good deal unless you have money?
Kids= made way easier with money
Devout= I personally believe religious indoctrination-especially evangelical- is the main source of evil in this world so nope not interested in her opinions

That fact that she thinks she has something original to say when her entire existence is because of mommy and daddy money.....she is just a snake-oil columnist.

Judging by the photo posted, pretty cannot he made with enough money.

He was! But also, he was Hollywood schlubby, which is considerably more mainstream attractive than real-life schlubby. He cleans up nice.

I think Katherine is attractive, too, but in a mainstream America way, and she lives in Southern California, where the expectation is for women to be drop-dead gorgeous by any means necessary.

PP that posted the photo - I posted it because I actually think she IS pretty and I've seen a lot of photos of her looking much better. I feel like this photo was another dig at her.

She’s classically gorgeous. And it’s obvious the bitter hags in this thread are jealous of that fact, along with her rich husband, beautiful children, and her commitment to her faith.

Gorgeous? Come on now. She's blandly pleasant looking and cute at best in a very dime a dozen way. She's not turning heads on the street.

And you are? You’re all seething in this thread because you’re jealous of everything she has and everything she represents. Because she didn’t go to college for 8 years and get an pointless frequent flier email job like y’all, and in the end she bagged a filthy rich husband and has a gorgeous all-American family. It stings.

I think the only person envious of her is you. All the rest of us are unimpressed.

If she and Chris and two adorable kids walk into a random suburban restaurant heads will turn. They’re a very attractive family. People have eyes.

No. They are normal looking white people.

+100
Chris whole career started because he looked like the average shlubby white guy.

But he was so funny as a dumb schlubby dude

[Anonymous]

Chris Pratt is SO INCREDIBLY HOT!!!!!!
...sorry not sorry..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we ask Jeff where the pro-Katherine posts are coming from?

I think it’s just one really sad Katherine stan

What on earth would compel someone to be a Katherine Stan

What on Earth would compel a gaggle of old bags to spend a week cyber-bullying a non-famous stay at home young Christian mother?

So you’re the OP of the thread in Website Feedback, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we ask Jeff where the pro-Katherine posts are coming from?

I think it’s just one really sad Katherine stan

What on earth would compel someone to be a Katherine Stan

What on Earth would compel a gaggle of old bags to spend a week cyber-bullying a non-famous stay at home young Christian mother?

No one is bullying her. No one is talking to her, so how is that bullying? Pointing out that a privileged lady is an empty denim jumpsuit? Why would she care? She has what she wants.

This thread started out of admiration for a NYT profile that is superficially praising her but getting in a truckload of jabs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we ask Jeff where the pro-Katherine posts are coming from?

I think it’s just one really sad Katherine stan

What on earth would compel someone to be a Katherine Stan

What on Earth would compel a gaggle of old bags to spend a week cyber-bullying a non-famous stay at home young Christian mother?

No one is bullying her. No one is talking to her, so how is that bullying? Pointing out that a privileged lady is an empty denim jumpsuit? Why would she care? She has what she wants.

This thread started out of admiration for a NYT profile that is superficially praising her but getting in a truckload of jabs.

So some bitter dog mom freelance writer is using this thread to gin up clicks to one of her sellout puff pieces? Because no random person is reading this subtext.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we ask Jeff where the pro-Katherine posts are coming from?

I think it’s just one really sad Katherine stan

What on earth would compel someone to be a Katherine Stan

What on Earth would compel a gaggle of old bags to spend a week cyber-bullying a non-famous stay at home young Christian mother?

Ma'am this thread is based on a New York Times profile she did to promote her latest book. Who are you talking about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we ask Jeff where the pro-Katherine posts are coming from?

I think it’s just one really sad Katherine stan

What on earth would compel someone to be a Katherine Stan

What on Earth would compel a gaggle of old bags to spend a week cyber-bullying a non-famous stay at home young Christian mother?

Ma'am this thread is based on a New York Times profile she did to promote her latest book. Who are you talking about?

Lol. Right? I’m enjoying the take that this is just some rando SAHM being persecuted for being Christian. By all the childless Brooklyn dog moms that populate a DC-based parenting forum!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we ask Jeff where the pro-Katherine posts are coming from?

I think it’s just one really sad Katherine stan

What on earth would compel someone to be a Katherine Stan

What on Earth would compel a gaggle of old bags to spend a week cyber-bullying a non-famous stay at home young Christian mother?

Ma'am this thread is based on a New York Times profile she did to promote her latest book. Who are you talking about?

Lol. Right? I’m enjoying the take that this is just some rando SAHM being persecuted for being Christian. By all the childless Brooklyn dog moms that populate a DC-based parenting forum!

No persecuted for being "Christian" it's for being a dumbass how wants to push her crap on others big difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we ask Jeff where the pro-Katherine posts are coming from?

I think it’s just one really sad Katherine stan

What on earth would compel someone to be a Katherine Stan

What on Earth would compel a gaggle of old bags to spend a week cyber-bullying a non-famous stay at home young Christian mother?

I reserve the term “young mother” for a mother who’s about a decade younger than she is.