Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
We don’t have to lie anyone we won! Sisters 4 sepsis 4ever. |
These Red state Universities that today denied our daughters' their civil rights will go belly Up when we pull our daughters and son's college Apps They have literally already committed the funds from this years admission yields to formulate their staff budget,the health insurance payments for their faculty, their returee pensions and the payments on their debt The price for treating our daughters as less than equal citizens and exposing them to a Felony record is mass default to: Tulane, Emory, Vanderbilt, Wash- U, Furman, Texas- Austin, Ole Miss, University of Kentucky... on and on and on Each and every family will be taking its 200,00- $ 250,000 ( 1/4 million dollars ) tuition elsewhere..... Your states will return to being economic backwaters |
More to the point: each family that pulls their college App pulls 200K- 250K ( 1/4 million dollars) from the budget of these schools in states that will make our daughters felons for exercising self autonomy. drop in each schools admissions yield will kill their budget and ability to attract top faculty, pay good salaries to profs they want to attract, offer health insurance to faculty ( a Universities biggest expense) and service their debt on the buildings they have poured millions into to attract more students This is not 1972. Women do not need to " ask for our rights" we will just economically crush each state that denies them |
+1. And their university’s ranking will sink. It’s a fact. |
More lies from the pro abortion crowd. Keep believing your histrionics. |
Wait and see. I know I am correct. The red state universities will slip in the rankings. |
You seem very angry. My guess is you’re an incel in his bedroom trolling forums such as these. No one wants to have sex with you, let alone have your baby. |
PP knows that, and PP doesn't care what anyone else wants. PP only cares about what he wants, and will force anyone to give it to him, whether they are willing to or not. |
Stop embarrassing yourself, PP, and go to bed. Seriously. |
This has got to be parody. |
Why? Do you not realize how pissed off and disgusted people are with the ruling, and how powerless they've been rendered? |
You keep posting the same deranged rant. Do whatever you’d like but you present as an utter loon. |
In your hypothetical situation, there is no legal means to go after a doctor that refuses to protect the life of the mother
|
Please link to the story. Usually when people do, there’s details they don’t post. |
1) she had no clue she was pregnant. Not the phrase “little or no time”. She had the window for abortion open. She chose not to: “For Anna, there would have been little to no time to get an abortion in Texas by the time she discovered her pregnancy. She and Scott were open to having a baby, even if a bit sooner than they might have planned, so they moved up their wedding plans to December.” 2) The doctor told her there was risk to her life, then also told her they could not provide an abortion due to the law. That is not true - someone here is lying. Once it’s medically determined that there is risk to the mother’s life by doctors (and there were PLENTY at a hospital), they had the legal right to abort. Note this statement fro the article: “ But under Texas law, abortions are allowed at that stage only for severe medical emergencies, defined as when a patient is "in danger of death or a serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function." And because fetal heart tones were detectable, doctors told Anna they couldn't offer her that option.” It’s simply not true as the carve out for life of the mother is despite a fetal heartbeat. This article is just full of speculation and crap. |