Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can clearly see his phone in his front pocket. My son is a detective and they have this software that will tell you every single phone attached to a tower by the second. It should be trivial to isolate each cell phone IMEI to an individual then to filter by age and sex to get a list of names. I would guess quantico is already crunching this data and they will have a short list very soon. They will catch this guy.

Unless he stole a phone.

Or it was off.

They might be able to track more than we think when they are off. I'm not entirely sure about that though.

If this person is caught for stupid reasons, I'll be surprised. And I am not sure I believe there is an entire handprint on a (the?) gun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The shooter was a highly experienced sniper/marksman. One shot yet so precise from far away. The average person wouldn’t be able to do that. The shooter has some sort of military/government background for sure.I find it hard to believe some hare brained transgender kid was behind this.

Exactly. Military man...100%

Why wouldn’t a real expert get a clesn head shot?

A real expert would aim for center mass - the chest, not the head.

On a man wearing a bulletproof vest? That would be ineffective.

A vest is no match for a rifle. Even if you armor them up with heavy plates. I don't know if CK had plates, but I see no evidence of them in the pictures (they're very bulky).

Plates? I don't think he had any vest on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s the video of the man in the white hat and guy next to him making signs that someone posted yesterday. This is a close up of the men and there’s nothing violent, fyi.

https://www.threads.com/@ryshead/post/DOcwTuVjho6?xmt=AQF0ih4JsFf6dVqShr8GxnF6EGvccRtPDuPhq7JPMcHQUA&slof=1

Just stop. The man with the white hat is part of Kirk’s group.

Then why are they making those gestures right as he got shot? Genuinely curious. Were they signaling to move onto the next question? Seems odd, no.

Oh it’s a conspiracy! If only we knew the name of the man in the white hat! He must be wearing a mission impossible type mask.

I’m not saying it’s a conspiracy. I’m asking for a reasonable explanation, which it doesn’t sound like you have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The shooter was a highly experienced sniper/marksman. One shot yet so precise from far away. The average person wouldn’t be able to do that. The shooter has some sort of military/government background for sure.I find it hard to believe some hare brained transgender kid was behind this.

Exactly. Military man...100%

There are thousands and thousands of young men in Utah and the Mountain West generally who grew up hunting and shooting. It's not Bethesda out there. Most people know how to handle a gun. Besides, it wasn't a perfect shot. No one aims for the neck. He either went for a head shot and hit low. Or a chest shot and hit high. There is nothing remarkable about the shot or the distance itself in the context of Utah.

The neck is not covered with kevlar. Why would someone shoot for the chest covered with a kevlar vest?

Are we sure he was wearing a vest? A Kevlar vest will not stop a rifle round at 200 yard and is very bulky. A flexible vest does not deflect a bullet but spreads the energy over larger area, preventing penetration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can clearly see his phone in his front pocket. My son is a detective and they have this software that will tell you every single phone attached to a tower by the second. It should be trivial to isolate each cell phone IMEI to an individual then to filter by age and sex to get a list of names. I would guess quantico is already crunching this data and they will have a short list very soon. They will catch this guy.

Unless he stole a phone.

Or it was off.

They might be able to track more than we think when they are off. I'm not entirely sure about that though.

If this person is caught for stupid reasons, I'll be surprised. And I am not sure I believe there is an entire handprint on a (the?) gun.

I've written tower dump warrants before. If the phone was off, it won't show up on a list of phones interacting with the tower.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The shooter was a highly experienced sniper/marksman. One shot yet so precise from far away. The average person wouldn’t be able to do that. The shooter has some sort of military/government background for sure.I find it hard to believe some hare brained transgender kid was behind this.

Exactly. Military man...100%

Why wouldn’t a real expert get a clesn head shot?

A real expert would aim for center mass - the chest, not the head.

On a man wearing a bulletproof vest? That would be ineffective.

A vest is no match for a rifle. Even if you armor them up with heavy plates. I don't know if CK had plates, but I see no evidence of them in the pictures (they're very bulky).

Plates? I don't think he had any vest on.

I see a nipple...wouldn't a vest squash a nip slip?

[Anonymous]

Yeah he wasn't wearing a vest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The shooter was a highly experienced sniper/marksman. One shot yet so precise from far away. The average person wouldn’t be able to do that. The shooter has some sort of military/government background for sure.I find it hard to believe some hare brained transgender kid was behind this.

Exactly. Military man...100%

Why wouldn’t a real expert get a clesn head shot?

A real expert would aim for center mass - the chest, not the head.

On a man wearing a bulletproof vest? That would be ineffective.

A vest is no match for a rifle. Even if you armor them up with heavy plates. I don't know if CK had plates, but I see no evidence of them in the pictures (they're very bulky).

Plates? I don't think he had any vest on.

Yes there is not vest that has nipples.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't gun violence; this was a targeted assassination of a major leader because of political views. If guns were outlawed, they would have poisoned him, run him over, killed him with a knife, bomb, etc

He was not a leader. He was a podcaster.

I think thats where everyone is not understanding the impact he was a major leader and voice

He was not a leader. Not a government official. Not even a college degree holder. Yes, he had vocal cords. An influencer? Sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s the video of the man in the white hat and guy next to him making signs that someone posted yesterday. This is a close up of the men and there’s nothing violent, fyi.

https://www.threads.com/@ryshead/post/DOcwTuVjho6?xmt=AQF0ih4JsFf6dVqShr8GxnF6EGvccRtPDuPhq7JPMcHQUA&slof=1

Just stop. The man with the white hat is part of Kirk’s group.

Then why are they making those gestures right as he got shot? Genuinely curious. Were they signaling to move onto the next question? Seems odd, no.

Oh it’s a conspiracy! If only we knew the name of the man in the white hat! He must be wearing a mission impossible type mask.

I saw a guy adjusting the brim of his hat on a sunny day and scratching his nose.

Okay, sure. And the guy next to him in black who starts tapping his arm after looking both ways.

[Anonymous]

I can see his moobs. He’s not wearing a vest.

[Anonymous]

Let’s review:
• Trans/Antifa bullets left as calling cards
• Man to his right sending basbeball signals, Maxwell Smart style
• MAGa shirt worn to confuse and throw off scent
• Russian/Israeli or Trump 2028 supporter - takes out competition or dissenter
• Fake bullet path AI generated
• Professional sniper or 12 year old or college student or military trained hit man responsible

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so the evidence that was meant to be left behind has antifa and transgender whatever scrawled on it but the actual shooter, who apparently doesn't want caught, was wearing an obscure MAGA shirt?

To be fair, he had to blend in to enter campus that day. So his clothes don't tell us anything about his political beliefs.

And the bullet messages "blend in" a different way. I don't think these clues are going to give us much.

The same assertion about bullet messages was made about the united health ceo and that was bunk. It is a default assertion by the right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't gun violence; this was a targeted assassination of a major leader because of political views. If guns were outlawed, they would have poisoned him, run him over, killed him with a knife, bomb, etc

He was not a leader. He was a podcaster.

I think thats where everyone is not understanding the impact he was a major leader and voice

He was not a leader. Not a government official. Not even a college degree holder. Yes, he had vocal cords. An influencer? Sure.

"Not even a college degree holder."

LOL, well neither are a lot of highly intelligent, highly successful folks. Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Richard Branson, Walt Disney, etc...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Weapon was probably this short action 30-06.

Scope is mounted too far back towards the buttstock. Probably not a professional.