Yes! We get to use everything at our disposal to save our children’s lives. |
Then he could get a glock or other gun instead and shoot kids with that. Banning AR 15s is certainly worth discussing, but it will not by itself stop school shootings. |
He should not have been able to get any gun!! Jesus, how is that not apparent! Let’s actually address the bullets that ripped into those little kids and stop that at the fricking source!! |
Don't you care about DECREASING loss of life? |
Yes, he’d go right out to the Glock tree and pick a few. JFC.
|
DP Why do you think school shooters consistently choose guns like the AR15, instead of Glocks? |
+1 |
+1. IT’S THE GUN |
I HATE people who bring up the door. If you have 2 AR-15s and 78 minutes and 1000s of rounds of ammo, what would have stopped the gunman from blasting that door open? Or a window? |
You have to be 21 to purchase a handgun |
Except that it shouldn’t be the responsibility of teachers to protect their students from crazed gunmen. They are teachers. Forcing this responsibility on them - much like suggesting that teachers be armed - is not a solution. It’s an excuse for more guns. That’s it. |
Is this your logic? AR 15s shoot more bullets and shoot faster than handguns. Therefore, without AR 15s . . . there would be no more school shootings? |
x1 billion It’s the gun. |
Yes!! How is that not clear? Fewer bullets ripping into small bodies would be a huge fricking step forward. |
It’s the gun. |