War with Iran Part II
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Ah yes, right on schedule as the market closes on Friday. War on the weekends, peace while the market is open. |
Anonymous
|
Shah Meer Baloch
Iran has made no request for talks with the Americans and has so far completely rejected US requests for negotiations due to their excessive demands, Iran’s state media Tasnim News reported, rejecting the White House press secretary earlier remarks about Tehran’s request for talks. Take that, kkkaroline. Stop telling lies. |
Anonymous
Hell's yeah fuk up them hajis |
Anonymous
Estimated inventories as of today
|
Anonymous
|
The Desperation.
Iran sent a delegation to Islamabad to hold bilateral talks with Pakistani officials this weekend. So Trump sends the grovelling zionist Two Stooges on an unplanned trip to Islamabad for "talks" The Iranians have said there are no scheduled talks with America. If there weren't zionist war crimes involved, this would be pathetically hilarious. Instead, it's just pathetic. Iranian delegation led by FM Araghchi lands in Islamabad; US officials to also arrive in Pakistan https://www.dawn.com/news/1994680/iranian-delegation-led-by-fm-araghchi-lands-in-islamabad-us-officials-to-also-arrive-in-pakistan Foreign Office (FO) Spokesperson Tahir Andrabi said on Friday that an Iranian delegation led by the Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had arrived in Islamabad. The development came as the White House said that envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner would also be heading to Pakistan for talks with Iran. However, Iran asserted that it would not be meeting with the US. In a post on X, FO spokesperson Andrabi Araghchi was received by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, Chief of Defence Forces and Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir and other senior officials. Earlier, Pakistani sources said a small negotiating team was expected to accompany the foreign minister. They said a second round of peace talks with the United States was also expected and that a logistics and security team from the US was already in the federal capital. However, the spokesperson for Iran’s foreign ministry, Esmaeil Baqaei, said on X that no meeting was planned to take place between the US and Iran. “Iran’s observations would be conveyed to Pakistan,” he said. He said the Iranian delegation will be meeting with high-level officials in “concert with their ongoing mediation and good offices for ending American imposed war of aggression and the restitution of peace in our region”. |
Anonymous
lol All aircraft carriers have to be 500 plus miles off the coast of Iran. The range of an f-35 is 500 miles. So to get in range of Iran’s coast it takes a refueling. This has to be at least 150 miles from the Iranian coast. Most likely need another refueling to make it back to the carrier. The f-35 is a junk. How they have some f-18s. This carrier group was added because the US needs more ships and air assets to run blockade Iran. Still do not have enough ship and air cover to blockade Iran. Cuba took 8 aircraft carriers, 200 plus ship and we had land based aircraft for a 500 miles quarantine zone. |
Anonymous
| Americans Spent $8.4 Billion More on Gas in the First Month of Trump’s Iran War |
Anonymous
|
Iran's latest Lego drop: "We love Americans".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2R7xUxtd5Bk |
Anonymous
Should I believe Presidential Truths Social Post or the Iranian government? This is the question. |
Anonymous
You are mixing bad numbers with bad history. There is no fixed rule that carriers must sit “500 plus miles” off Iran. Carrier locations depend on threat, escorts, submarines, mission needs, tankers, and intelligence. The three U.S. carriers are already operating across the Red Sea, Arabian Sea, and broader CENTCOM theater, which is exactly how modern naval power projects force. The F-35C claim is wrong too. Its published combat radius is over 600 nautical miles, not “500 miles,” and that is mission radius, not simple one-way distance. Tanker support is routine for every advanced air force because it increases loiter time, payload flexibility, and persistence. That does not make the aircraft junk. It makes it part of a modern integrated force. Calling the F-35 junk is especially uninformed. It is one of the most advanced fighters in the world with stealth, sensor fusion, electronic warfare capability, and networking that older jets cannot match. The reason carriers still fly F/A-18E/F Super Hornets is because the Navy has not fully replaced legacy fleets yet and procurement decisions over multiple administrations slowed the transition. The F-22 production line was shut down during the Obama administration, leaving the U.S. with too few top-tier air superiority fighters, while slower F-35 procurement stretched replacement timelines and prolonged reliance on legacy F/A-18 fleets. That is a force-structure issue, not a failure of the aircraft. The Cuba comparison is also weak. In 1962 there were no stealth aircraft, no satellite ISR, no precision strike networks, no Growlers, no E-2D battle management, no Tomahawk-capable escorts, and no modern datalink warfare. Counting eight carriers then versus three now ignores that a modern 200+ aircraft carrier force can generate effects that far exceed raw 1962 numbers. This is internet math, not military analysis. |
Anonymous
|
State Department Openly Admits Israel Pushed Us Into Iran War
https://newrepublic.com/post/209518/state-department-admits-israel-iran-war Even the State Department recognizes that the U.S. entered the Iran war on behalf of Israel. A government release written earlier this week by Reed D. Rubinstein, the department’s legal adviser, detailed how the U.S. “is engaged in this conflict at the request of and in the collective self-defense of its Israeli ally, as well as in the exercise of the United States’ own inherent right of self-defense.” The release cited multiple letters issued by the agency to the U.N. Security Council as evidence of the apparent connection. But the candid admission directly contradicts the White House and Donald Trump, who has repeatedly insisted that Israel had nothing to do with his decision to spark another unpopular Middle East war. Just this week, Trump complained online about the circling narrative, claiming on Truth Social that “Israel never talked me into the war with Iran” but that “the results of Oct. 7th, added to my lifelong opinion that IRAN CAN NEVER HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON, did.” U.S. involvement in the war was reportedly arranged following a February 11 meeting between Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and several U.S. and Israeli officials in the White House Situation Room, The New York Times reported earlier this month. It was reportedly Netanyahu’s direct influence—and the ensuing pressure campaign—that thrust America into the war. U.S. military commanders advised Trump that components of Netanyahu’s plan to attack Iran were “farcical,” but by that point, Trump had already been inspired to throw over Tehran’s theocratic regime. It’s likely that Netanyahu continues to hold the reins. Last month, Trump told The Times of Israel that the decision to end the Iran war will be a “mutual” decision he makes with the Israeli leader—though Israel has not made peace negotiations easy, repeatedly defying fragile ceasefire arrangements by relentlessly bombing its regional neighbors. |
Anonymous
You are utterly comical. No mention from you about the past 80 years of IRANIAN terrorism against not only Israelis and other ME countries, but also against Americans. Hezbollah and Hamas are Iranian proxies and have targeted Israelis and Americans for decades - since 1979. The Iranian regime has waged a sustained campaign of violence against the United States, killing U.S. troops, targeting diplomats and civilians, and plotting attacks on American soil. "Death to America" is their mantra. You can certainly spin your anti-Israel fantasies all you want, but you are on the wrong side of history. Speaking of which, learn some. https://thehill.com/policy/international/5765178-inside-irans-long-history-of-attacks-on-us-a-timeline/ https://iranprimer.usip.org/blog/2020/sep/16/timeline-iran-assassinations-and-plot https://www.cfr.org/articles/irans-regional-armed-network |
Anonymous
Sure. Any other Iranian propaganda you'd like to share, straight from the mouth of the corrupt Iranian foreign minister? 
The IRGC is only accelerating executions of protesters. They are a grotesque, monstrous regime. https://abcnews.com/International/executions-protesters-iran-surge-start-war-human-rights/story?id=132250133 |
Anonymous
Speaking of... it's always people who say this who deliberately never provide any credible sources to back up their claims. Case in point, you. DP |
Anonymous
It's funny that you actually believe... Iranian state media. But you do you! |