British Royals

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

I'm glad Kate and William are finally concerned given the fact that they like hanging out with him.



This pic is from AFTER Andrew stepped down as a working royal in 2023.

+1. Also, William took Andrew in his private plane to Balmoral as the late Queen was dying, but left Harry on the ground 1/2 hour away. Another journo says Kate and William said they would rather have Andrew as a neighbor than Harry and Meghan.

Who is a bigger threat to William? Creepy Uncle Randy Andy or his brother who sold him out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know, but I think it's pretty telling about Royal fans that they think Harry & Meghan are a bigger problem than Andrew and Fergie.

Harry and Meghan now know that King Charles will strip titles from relatives if warranted and Harry and Meghan are terrified of losing their title.

Naah. Harry will always be a royal prince because he's the son of a king. They might lose the Sussex titles because William's basically a vindictive sob and rants constantly about stripping their HRH when he's king. But not even King Willy can change the fact that Harry is a prince.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kate has a very carefully curated public image so it's hard to find fault with her. She's milquetoast. I think people forget how she was raked through the press as Waity Katie and for her "common" roots, before she was married. I'm old enough to remember the stories of William's school friends saying "doors to manual" when Kate entered a room bc her mom used to be a flight attendant. Who knows if that's true, but that's what Kate got picked on for.

Now you don't really see anything but a thin, polished, restrained middle aged woman. There's just not that much material there people!

There's lots of complaining in Britain about how Kate's lazy and doesn't use her platform to champion serious causes. Instead she comes out once every other week and did that insipid "Seasons" video series with her voiceover reminding us there are four seasons and that connecting with people is good, or something something. If Kate could go on international ski vacations twice last year (at least) and once this year (so far), she's healthy enough to get back to work.

Diana worked hard, snuck into hospices before dawn without publicity, and used the same platform to touch AIDS patients and walk through landmine zones.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

I'm glad Kate and William are finally concerned given the fact that they like hanging out with him.



This pic is from AFTER Andrew stepped down as a working royal in 2023.

+1. Also, William took Andrew in his private plane to Balmoral as the late Queen was dying, but left Harry on the ground 1/2 hour away. Another journo says Kate and William said they would rather have Andrew as a neighbor than Harry and Meghan.

Who is a bigger threat to William? Creepy Uncle Randy Andy or his brother who sold him out?

So you think it's OK that William shoved Harry into a dog bowl, but not OK that Harry wrote about it? And you also think that William and Kate's team briefing lies about Meghan's bridesmaids' dresses is OK, but it's not OK for Harry to write about that?

Well, some posters here have unusual moral compasses, I guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

I'm glad Kate and William are finally concerned given the fact that they like hanging out with him.



This pic is from AFTER Andrew stepped down as a working royal in 2023.

+1. Also, William took Andrew in his private plane to Balmoral as the late Queen was dying, but left Harry on the ground 1/2 hour away. Another journo says Kate and William said they would rather have Andrew as a neighbor than Harry and Meghan.

Who is a bigger threat to William? Creepy Uncle Randy Andy or his brother who sold him out?

So you think it's OK that William shoved Harry into a dog bowl, but not OK that Harry wrote about it? And you also think that William and Kate's team briefing lies about Meghan's bridesmaids' dresses is OK, but it's not OK for Harry to write about that?

Well, some posters here have unusual moral compasses, I guess.

Wait what were the lies about the bridesmaid dresses? I can't keep up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone here knows which direction this thread will go and why it will eventually be locked.

Why even try at this point.

I haven't seen any posts that are worthy of reporting?

If you've hung out on this board for any time at all, you'll know that all threads about the royals eventually get locked because of the way posters talk about Meghan.

No, because of the way a scant few women flip out against any critique of Meghan Markle, whereas any other public figure is fair game.

My favorite is when the rabid anti-Meghan crowd starts posting like they're posh Brits.

Your dimwit vocab is your issue, among all of your other problems.

Regarding Fergie - she has enjoyed the benefit of the doubt because she crybabied about Duchess of Pork and her divorcee in-law issues, never having the charm to accept that her own rank choices were her fault. Andrew Lownie’s expose Entitled (about the Yorks) is getting some fresh material included in the paperback release. The “shagging weekend” email she wrote to Epstein has decimated the fantasy Sarah had tried to sell, that she took pride in her excellent mothering to her daughters. She is a disgusting, greedy monster all on her own. She and Andrew were definitely meant to be and the Queen’s failure to corral her son permanently damages the limited good she managed to accomplish.

DP. You'll get no Fergie-love from me. But as a few others here have said, it's the women (Fergie and Meghan), and not the actual pedo and trafficker (Andrew), who are the target of your ire. This poster devoted a full para to bashing Fergie as a "disgusting, greedy monster." And this poster, or someone else, is trying to spin this thread into yet another anti-Meghan hate train. While the actual pedo, Andrew is being painted here as some sad-sack old fogey who's too vulnerable to be sent out to a flat of his own. Can you see the problem?

As for calling pp a dimwit, Kate's fangirls are very Klassy

You're so cute! Throwing a tantrum because you can't control the dialogue.

Nope. I'm commenting on your dialogue. Specifically, on your misogynistic take on women vs. men.

It's a fact: you're ignoring the actual pedo so you can hate on two women. Prove me wrong.

Is anyone ignoring the Andrew thing? I think he's universally despised. The thread was about royals and their spouses- it's the very first post. I don't think we are required to discuss any one of them in particular.

There hasn't been a peep about Camilla, my how far she has come from the so-called third woman in Princess Diana's marriage.

Several here want to shove Andrew under the figurative rug so they can complain about women. Fergie, Meghan, and now Camilla. It's pretty gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone here knows which direction this thread will go and why it will eventually be locked.

Why even try at this point.

I haven't seen any posts that are worthy of reporting?

If you've hung out on this board for any time at all, you'll know that all threads about the royals eventually get locked because of the way posters talk about Meghan.

No, because of the way a scant few women flip out against any critique of Meghan Markle, whereas any other public figure is fair game.

My favorite is when the rabid anti-Meghan crowd starts posting like they're posh Brits.

Your dimwit vocab is your issue, among all of your other problems.

Regarding Fergie - she has enjoyed the benefit of the doubt because she crybabied about Duchess of Pork and her divorcee in-law issues, never having the charm to accept that her own rank choices were her fault. Andrew Lownie’s expose Entitled (about the Yorks) is getting some fresh material included in the paperback release. The “shagging weekend” email she wrote to Epstein has decimated the fantasy Sarah had tried to sell, that she took pride in her excellent mothering to her daughters. She is a disgusting, greedy monster all on her own. She and Andrew were definitely meant to be and the Queen’s failure to corral her son permanently damages the limited good she managed to accomplish.

DP. You'll get no Fergie-love from me. But as a few others here have said, it's the women (Fergie and Meghan), and not the actual pedo and trafficker (Andrew), who are the target of your ire. This poster devoted a full para to bashing Fergie as a "disgusting, greedy monster." And this poster, or someone else, is trying to spin this thread into yet another anti-Meghan hate train. While the actual pedo, Andrew is being painted here as some sad-sack old fogey who's too vulnerable to be sent out to a flat of his own. Can you see the problem?

As for calling pp a dimwit, Kate's fangirls are very Klassy

You're so cute! Throwing a tantrum because you can't control the dialogue.

Nope. I'm commenting on your dialogue. Specifically, on your misogynistic take on women vs. men.

It's a fact: you're ignoring the actual pedo so you can hate on two women. Prove me wrong.

Is anyone ignoring the Andrew thing? I think he's universally despised. The thread was about royals and their spouses- it's the very first post. I don't think we are required to discuss any one of them in particular.

There hasn't been a peep about Camilla, my how far she has come from the so-called third woman in Princess Diana's marriage.

Several here want to shove Andrew under the figurative rug so they can complain about women. Fergie, Meghan, and now Camilla. It's pretty gross.

The point of that post is that nobody is complaining about Camilla. She used to get such a bad rap and now everyone is over it (as they well should be).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

Too little, too late. The British equivalent of "thoughts and prayers." Do you live in Britain or have access to their media including comments? The British public is MAD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

I'm glad Kate and William are finally concerned given the fact that they like hanging out with him.



This pic is from AFTER Andrew stepped down as a working royal in 2023.

+1. Also, William took Andrew in his private plane to Balmoral as the late Queen was dying, but left Harry on the ground 1/2 hour away. Another journo says Kate and William said they would rather have Andrew as a neighbor than Harry and Meghan.

Who is a bigger threat to William? Creepy Uncle Randy Andy or his brother who sold him out?

So you think it's OK that William shoved Harry into a dog bowl, but not OK that Harry wrote about it? And you also think that William and Kate's team briefing lies about Meghan's bridesmaids' dresses is OK, but it's not OK for Harry to write about that?

Well, some posters here have unusual moral compasses, I guess.

Oh yes the moral compass that has you in a tizzy about a foreign former prince while you do nothing to get justice for the pervs we have here.

And I'm sure William has his own tales to tell about the prodigal son but he knows snitches get stitches.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

Too little, too late. The British equivalent of "thoughts and prayers." Do you live in Britain or have access to their media including comments? The British public is MAD.

You need a subscription for BBC. What other outlets would have this reporting? Depending on whether they knew anything, I would agree their statements aren't sufficient. Maybe I'm not informed enough of the Andrew angle, it's a lot just keeping up with the Epstein stuff at home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone here knows which direction this thread will go and why it will eventually be locked.

Why even try at this point.

I haven't seen any posts that are worthy of reporting?

If you've hung out on this board for any time at all, you'll know that all threads about the royals eventually get locked because of the way posters talk about Meghan.

No, because of the way a scant few women flip out against any critique of Meghan Markle, whereas any other public figure is fair game.

My favorite is when the rabid anti-Meghan crowd starts posting like they're posh Brits.

Your dimwit vocab is your issue, among all of your other problems.

Regarding Fergie - she has enjoyed the benefit of the doubt because she crybabied about Duchess of Pork and her divorcee in-law issues, never having the charm to accept that her own rank choices were her fault. Andrew Lownie’s expose Entitled (about the Yorks) is getting some fresh material included in the paperback release. The “shagging weekend” email she wrote to Epstein has decimated the fantasy Sarah had tried to sell, that she took pride in her excellent mothering to her daughters. She is a disgusting, greedy monster all on her own. She and Andrew were definitely meant to be and the Queen’s failure to corral her son permanently damages the limited good she managed to accomplish.

DP. You'll get no Fergie-love from me. But as a few others here have said, it's the women (Fergie and Meghan), and not the actual pedo and trafficker (Andrew), who are the target of your ire. This poster devoted a full para to bashing Fergie as a "disgusting, greedy monster." And this poster, or someone else, is trying to spin this thread into yet another anti-Meghan hate train. While the actual pedo, Andrew is being painted here as some sad-sack old fogey who's too vulnerable to be sent out to a flat of his own. Can you see the problem?

As for calling pp a dimwit, Kate's fangirls are very Klassy

You're so cute! Throwing a tantrum because you can't control the dialogue.

Nope. I'm commenting on your dialogue. Specifically, on your misogynistic take on women vs. men.

It's a fact: you're ignoring the actual pedo so you can hate on two women. Prove me wrong.

Is anyone ignoring the Andrew thing? I think he's universally despised. The thread was about royals and their spouses- it's the very first post. I don't think we are required to discuss any one of them in particular.

There hasn't been a peep about Camilla, my how far she has come from the so-called third woman in Princess Diana's marriage.

Several here want to shove Andrew under the figurative rug so they can complain about women. Fergie, Meghan, and now Camilla. It's pretty gross.

Because it's the entertainment forum. There are multiple Epstein related threads you could join to continue that discussion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

Too little, too late. The British equivalent of "thoughts and prayers." Do you live in Britain or have access to their media including comments? The British public is MAD.

You need a subscription for BBC. What other outlets would have this reporting? Depending on whether they knew anything, I would agree their statements aren't sufficient. Maybe I'm not informed enough of the Andrew angle, it's a lot just keeping up with the Epstein stuff at home.

They stripped his title. They removed him from the royal website. They took away his security and put him in the smallest little house they own. They famously don't wax on and on about anything but their actions speak pretty loudly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate has a very carefully curated public image so it's hard to find fault with her. She's milquetoast. I think people forget how she was raked through the press as Waity Katie and for her "common" roots, before she was married. I'm old enough to remember the stories of William's school friends saying "doors to manual" when Kate entered a room bc her mom used to be a flight attendant. Who knows if that's true, but that's what Kate got picked on for.

Now you don't really see anything but a thin, polished, restrained middle aged woman. There's just not that much material there people!

Ah yes, we've entered the phase where we pretend that the way that Kate was treated is in any way equivalent to the irrational hatred that Meghan gets. Next up: "But I didn't even realize that Meghan is black!!!"

That's my favorite. There's some idiot on this board who once posted in earnest they thought MM was just a really tan white woman, "maybe Latina or Italian-American."

I know when I think of a typical Italian-American mother I think of a dark-skinned Black woman with dreadlocks!

So when Meghan acknowledges she is perceived as ethnically ambiguous are you still shocked? It was kind of her shtick.

"Morphing from Latina when I was dressed in red, to African American when in mustard yellow," she writes. "My closet filled with fashionable frocks to make me look as racially varied as an Eighties Benetton poster."


https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/news/meghan-markle-career-actress-suits-mixed-race-engagement-prince-harry-royal-wedding-a8079716.html

If you actually read what you're quoting, she's saying that was how she was perceived by people in the industry. I.e. when she was playing a Latina they dressed her in red.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and King Charles have both put out public statements about their concern over the latest Epstein revelations. I agree with the PP way upthread who said William will never be photographed with Andrew again. I don't think Charles will either. I think he will live out his days in Charles' smallest personal home, getting the scrappiest of allowances, until he goes to jail.

I'm glad Kate and William are finally concerned given the fact that they like hanging out with him.



This pic is from AFTER Andrew stepped down as a working royal in 2023.

+1. Also, William took Andrew in his private plane to Balmoral as the late Queen was dying, but left Harry on the ground 1/2 hour away. Another journo says Kate and William said they would rather have Andrew as a neighbor than Harry and Meghan.

Who is a bigger threat to William? Creepy Uncle Randy Andy or his brother who sold him out?

So you think it's OK that William shoved Harry into a dog bowl, but not OK that Harry wrote about it? And you also think that William and Kate's team briefing lies about Meghan's bridesmaids' dresses is OK, but it's not OK for Harry to write about that?

Well, some posters here have unusual moral compasses, I guess.

Wait what were the lies about the bridesmaid dresses? I can't keep up.

Kate threw a hissy fit over Charlotte not wearing tights with her dress to the point that she made Kate cry, the media reported it as Meghan made Kate cry, Kate acknowledged privately that she was in the wrong (per Meghan) but never publicly said Meghan didn't make her cry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate has a very carefully curated public image so it's hard to find fault with her. She's milquetoast. I think people forget how she was raked through the press as Waity Katie and for her "common" roots, before she was married. I'm old enough to remember the stories of William's school friends saying "doors to manual" when Kate entered a room bc her mom used to be a flight attendant. Who knows if that's true, but that's what Kate got picked on for.

Now you don't really see anything but a thin, polished, restrained middle aged woman. There's just not that much material there people!

Ah yes, we've entered the phase where we pretend that the way that Kate was treated is in any way equivalent to the irrational hatred that Meghan gets. Next up: "But I didn't even realize that Meghan is black!!!"

That's my favorite. There's some idiot on this board who once posted in earnest they thought MM was just a really tan white woman, "maybe Latina or Italian-American."

I know when I think of a typical Italian-American mother I think of a dark-skinned Black woman with dreadlocks!

So when Meghan acknowledges she is perceived as ethnically ambiguous are you still shocked? It was kind of her shtick.

"Morphing from Latina when I was dressed in red, to African American when in mustard yellow," she writes. "My closet filled with fashionable frocks to make me look as racially varied as an Eighties Benetton poster."


https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/news/meghan-markle-career-actress-suits-mixed-race-engagement-prince-harry-royal-wedding-a8079716.html

If you actually read what you're quoting, she's saying that was how she was perceived by people in the industry. I.e. when she was playing a Latina they dressed her in red.

Because she fits the bill. She knows she can morph because of her looks. So she ran with it.