Meghan Markle Pink Short Suit at Lakers Game

[Anonymous]

It’s on trend, but the exaggerated volume on top is not doing her favors. It’s counter-intuitive, but you add volume to your thinner half to bring your body into proportion. She has amazing legs and understandably wants to flaunt them, but as a petite, she can’t go for the super exaggerated cuts.

Asan aside, she’s quite beautiful. It’s never okay to criticize anybody’s body. The body is never wrong—the clothes are. Let’s keep things positive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She doesn’t have toned legs. That’s a wrinkle mess. Stilettos and shorts are out of place in that event.

Stilettos and shorts are out of place literally everywhere. Except maybe a yacht. Which explains a lot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This look reads outdated and poorly executed to me.

Actually right on trend -- the color, the fit of the jacket, the matched set, it's all exactly on trend.

I think this version from Reiss (hers is from Staud) might have avoided the wrinkled linen issue that people are struggling with (I personally don't care, linen wrinkles, I don't get the issue), and it has a more tailored jacket. But I'm guessing people would find these shorts scandalously short on a real person, whereas the longer, slouchier set from Staud offers more coverage, especially at a sporting event where you are seated much of the time.

A lakers game is the wrong venue for this look.

This is one of the few occasions when her ripped jeans would have been appropriate.

I maintain her body is weird. Legs look good but her torso is rectangular no waist different proportions from limbs and her breasts are extremely odd, like noticeably strange.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She doesn’t have toned legs. That’s a wrinkle mess. Stilettos and shorts are out of place in that event.

Stilettos and shorts are out of place literally everywhere. Except maybe a yacht. Which explains a lot.

Stilettos on a yacht are a definite no. That should be obvious.

[Anonymous]

J. Crew has a version, too:

https://www.jcrew.com/p/BF427?color_name=kingfisher&fit=Classic

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m no MM fan but this body shaming is awful! She’s got a killer figure and she’s gorgeous! Such jealousy on this thread.

?

Even women with good bodies sometimes make bad fashion choices. This suit is a miss, and it’s okay for us to say so on an anonymous beauty and fashion forum since she is a public figure.

Many people aren't criticizing the suit, they are criticizing her body and claiming she looks bad. You can think this suit is a baggy, rumpled mess and still admit she's a beautiful woman with a great body.

When I read comments that say really critical things about her body or face, I just discount everything else they say because they obviously just have an axe to grind. People who go straight to "she's ugly" when talking about an obviously beautiful woman are not to be trusted.

Ok.

She’s thin. But she’s not tall like a model or curvy like a femme fatale.

She’s not perfect. In fact, her body isn’t amazing. It’s petite.

It is not petite. Petite is short.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m no MM fan but this body shaming is awful! She’s got a killer figure and she’s gorgeous! Such jealousy on this thread.

?

Even women with good bodies sometimes make bad fashion choices. This suit is a miss, and it’s okay for us to say so on an anonymous beauty and fashion forum since she is a public figure.

Many people aren't criticizing the suit, they are criticizing her body and claiming she looks bad. You can think this suit is a baggy, rumpled mess and still admit she's a beautiful woman with a great body.

When I read comments that say really critical things about her body or face, I just discount everything else they say because they obviously just have an axe to grind. People who go straight to "she's ugly" when talking about an obviously beautiful woman are not to be trusted.

Ok.

She’s thin. But she’s not tall like a model or curvy like a femme fatale.

She’s not perfect. In fact, her body isn’t amazing. It’s petite.

She's very square shaped.

And for some reason she insists on these oversized clothes that look sloppy.

It's weird. She looked good when she on the TV show. I'm not talking her show clothes. I mean her off work clothes.

[Anonymous]

In that outfit, she looks like a piece of Hubba Bubba Bubble Gum.

[Anonymous]

Not a fan of the look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She doesn’t have toned legs. That’s a wrinkle mess. Stilettos and shorts are out of place in that event.

Stilettos and shorts are out of place literally everywhere. Except maybe a yacht. Which explains a lot.

Stilettos on a yacht are a definite no. That should be obvious.

Unless you are a yacht girl

[Anonymous]

It looks great, a lot of you are nutso.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It looks great, a lot of you are nutso.

I like it! She’s a fashion icon.

[Anonymous]

Did someone really just call her petite?? LOL, she's not petite.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She always looks disheveled. It’s quite amazing considering everything she has at her disposal.
Personally I would not want her rectangular body it is very hard to dress it clothes don’t fit her well.

Even on suits, I wondered where her behind was. It was like her legs merged with her back. Rectangular makes sense. With that being said, I think she has great clothing sense for her body and wears most clothing very well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you want to buy it for yourself, ladies https://staud.clothing/collections/maxwell-blazer/products/maxwell-blazer-rosebud

Staud seems like such a rich mumsy try-hard brand.