Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Oh please. I stated that they both used the media to discuss their personal info. Whether you determine it to be good or bad info they are sharing is beside the point. You can't exploit your life on social media and then cry about the other person doing the same thing because they're not exploiting the "good" things. You also can't claim to take the high road when you're responding to them and then deleting it. Helloooo....

Natasha never responded to anything.. She responded by saying she WANTS to respond and will do so... That's not the same as actually responding back to the accusations though ...still looks like she is on a far higher road than Kane to me

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Except for the fact that she did already attempt to respond with that IG post about finally listening to the audio that she quickly deleted on Friday. So it would seem that she is not opposed to responding--she may be trying to craft another, presumably better, response.

Or it could be that she was faster than Peter at realizing that social media isn't where their marital problems belong. It could be anything really it just depends how cynical you are when reading into it.

Regardless Pete put her in a position where she HAS to respond eventually for her own sake... Not because she wants to ..lol she never asked for any of this to turn into public discussion

Leaving in the middle of the night and cleaning out the bank accounts, if true, guaranteed a public discussion just because Kane is a local celebrity. If you don't want people gossiping, don't do gossip worthy things. If she didn't do those things, I feel bad for her.

Regardless it doesn't change the fact that this is in the public because of Kane, not Natasha. That is something they could have resolved like every other couple but he wanted it in the public spotlight. It really wasn't anyone else's business ,That was the point

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Oh please. I stated that they both used the media to discuss their personal info. Whether you determine it to be good or bad info they are sharing is beside the point. You can't exploit your life on social media and then cry about the other person doing the same thing because they're not exploiting the "good" things. You also can't claim to take the high road when you're responding to them and then deleting it. Helloooo....

Natasha never responded to anything.. She responded by saying she WANTS to respond and will do so... That's not the same as actually responding back to the accusations though ...still looks like she is on a far higher road than Kane to me

Actually, she DID. It was in an IG post that she deleted a few minutes later. Much the way Kane deleted his audio. So neither is on a higher road than the other in the grand scheme of things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Oh please. I stated that they both used the media to discuss their personal info. Whether you determine it to be good or bad info they are sharing is beside the point. You can't exploit your life on social media and then cry about the other person doing the same thing because they're not exploiting the "good" things. You also can't claim to take the high road when you're responding to them and then deleting it. Helloooo....

Natasha never responded to anything.. She responded by saying she WANTS to respond and will do so... That's not the same as actually responding back to the accusations though ...still looks like she is on a far higher road than Kane to me

Actually, she DID. It was in an IG post that she deleted a few minutes later. Much the way Kane deleted his audio. So neither is on a higher road than the other in the grand scheme of things.

That post was a picture of her wearing earbuds saying she finally heard the audio.. And wants to refute some of the stuff in he said...that is not a response.....like I said it was a response saying she wants to respond, hardly the same thing. If she had responded we would know her side of the story and this thread would be dead

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Oh please. I stated that they both used the media to discuss their personal info. Whether you determine it to be good or bad info they are sharing is beside the point. You can't exploit your life on social media and then cry about the other person doing the same thing because they're not exploiting the "good" things. You also can't claim to take the high road when you're responding to them and then deleting it. Helloooo....

Natasha never responded to anything.. She responded by saying she WANTS to respond and will do so... That's not the same as actually responding back to the accusations though ...still looks like she is on a far higher road than Kane to me

Actually, she DID. It was in an IG post that she deleted a few minutes later. Much the way Kane deleted his audio. So neither is on a higher road than the other in the grand scheme of things.

That post was a picture of her wearing earbuds saying she finally heard the audio.. And wants to refute some of the stuff in he said...that is not a response.....like I said it was a response saying she wants to respond, hardly the same thing. If she had responded we would know her side of the story and this thread would be dead

+1 except I don't think the thread would be dead lol

[Anonymous]

The thread would still live on

[Anonymous]

Gotta love the kane show!!!! I wonder if kane is looking for people to go on dates with?? MY MAN!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Now that we have covered Kane's secret affair with Mia, shall we discuss why he always mentions that they had Neyo in the studio? Maybe he plays for both teams

[Anonymous]

Can we limit the posts to people who have actual information? Don't get me wrong, reading this thread and seeing everyone in the DMV's opinions on Danni, John and Rose's gum line has been SUPER entertaining, but now I just want info.

Sarah Fraser and Nat's family said Nat did what she did for a reason. So ladies, (because I bet you're reading this), what IS the reason?

[Anonymous]

Did anyone ever notice on Instagram she actually said she WONT air the details about her divorce

[Anonymous]

So on her instagram... The two hands making the heart... Am I the only one that thinks the left side looks like a man's hand?? Hmmmm......

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can we limit the posts to people who have actual information? Don't get me wrong, reading this thread and seeing everyone in the DMV's opinions on Danni, John and Rose's gum line has been SUPER entertaining, but now I just want info.

Sarah Fraser and Nat's family said Nat did what she did for a reason. So ladies, (because I bet you're reading this), what IS the reason?

Yes. This.

[Anonymous]

It totally looks like a guy's hand. I'm a tad bit confused on what the post meant, can someone kindly explain

[Anonymous]

The two hands look fe,ale to me. I think one is hers, the other is her mom or her sister bc both have what appear to be wedding rings on. I think the post was about a waitress at First Watch who heard Peter on Friday and said something nice to Nat and her family

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice how this morning on the show they were talking about how a woman wrote in about her workaholic husband? It sounded coincidentally similar to Kane's situation. John even said something about how being a workaholic was OK because he was sure the wife enjoyed all the money he was bringing in.

I think it's rude that P keeps airing his dirty laundry on air... he never once named N but the situation sure sounded similar. I texted in to the show saying that Kane's true colors were showing and it was unattractive and I got nasty texts back from John AND DANNI! I'm starting to find them all annoying...

Ugh, I heard that this morning, I thought it was really tasteless and catty.

YEP heard it!! It was so obvious. Making jokes and defending being a workaholic, etc. So messed up. I can't listen to this show the same way anymore.