Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now

[Anonymous]

I give up. What are "IG" posts????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I give up. What are "IG" posts????

InstaGram!
(I think)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just wanted to chime in...I've Been following this thread for longer than is good for me...but it is so damn entertaining! And I feel like I've actually learned some important things about people. One of the biggest trends I picked up on is that regardless of whether or not you are a good person, most people will be cynical and assume the worst of you, even if they have no information to suggest such a conclusion. This has really been a great social experiment! I have to feel sorry for nat with all these haters that think they could have done a better job, when we don't even know what led to this! The most logical explanation is that sometimes no matter how hard you try, marriages don't work out and it's better to go your separate ways. And yet people have come up with the wildest fantasies like "she is hooking up with another sugar daddy " or "she was in it for the money all along"... If I were nat and IF I was a gold Digger like so many of you have claimed, trust me I would not have married a lowly local radio DJ hedging everything on the bet that he would eventually be nationally syndicated... That's not how gold digging works sorry..anyhow,

Carry on!

Hi Danni

Hi! Thanks for taking the time to read my post. It took awhile to write because I had to stop and pump about halfway through, but I make it a habit to finish anything I start. #workingmom#thestruggle
My Man!!

Hmm, that response wasn't very defensive or aggressive though, may not be Danni posting after all hahaha.

[Anonymous]

Wow.

I have never seen such a plethora of inane, flat out dumb posts, in my entire history on DCUM. Seriously, to all you people who are obsessed with Kane: seriously, get a fucking life.

My God.

[Anonymous]

Yet, you are here reading this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Except for the fact that she did already attempt to respond with that IG post about finally listening to the audio that she quickly deleted on Friday. So it would seem that she is not opposed to responding--she may be trying to craft another, presumably better, response.

Or it could be that she was faster than Peter at realizing that social media isn't where their marital problems belong. It could be anything really it just depends how cynical you are when reading into it.

Regardless Pete put her in a position where she HAS to respond eventually for her own sake... Not because she wants to ..lol she never asked for any of this to turn into public discussion

Are we forgetting that she is the one that posted an entire blog detailing their marital and personal problems in March/April? And then both of them went on to do a TV interview partially about it? I don't think we can deny that BOTH of them are equally addicted to the forum that social media provides for airing their grievances.

Uhhhh...her blog post was about how they had problems and how they worked through them and that there was light at the end of the tunnel...so I have to question whether you even bothered to read it because the majority of it is positive...and you are comparing it to Kane trashing her on air which was 100% negative.... Yea...try again...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow.

I have never seen such a plethora of inane, flat out dumb posts, in my entire history on DCUM. Seriously, to all you people who are obsessed with Kane: seriously, get a fucking life.

My God.

Hi john... Still swearing like a teenager I see, don't worry you may have your own bandwagon one day...after speech therapy...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Except for the fact that she did already attempt to respond with that IG post about finally listening to the audio that she quickly deleted on Friday. So it would seem that she is not opposed to responding--she may be trying to craft another, presumably better, response.

Or it could be that she was faster than Peter at realizing that social media isn't where their marital problems belong. It could be anything really it just depends how cynical you are when reading into it.

Regardless Pete put her in a position where she HAS to respond eventually for her own sake... Not because she wants to ..lol she never asked for any of this to turn into public discussion

Are we forgetting that she is the one that posted an entire blog detailing their marital and personal problems in March/April? And then both of them went on to do a TV interview partially about it? I don't think we can deny that BOTH of them are equally addicted to the forum that social media provides for airing their grievances.

Uhhhh...her blog post was about how they had problems and how they worked through them and that there was light at the end of the tunnel...so I have to question whether you even bothered to read it because the majority of it is positive...and you are comparing it to Kane trashing her on air which was 100% negative.... Yea...try again...

Oh please. I stated that they both used the media to discuss their personal info. Whether you determine it to be good or bad info they are sharing is beside the point. You can't exploit your life on social media and then cry about the other person doing the same thing because they're not exploiting the "good" things. You also can't claim to take the high road when you're responding to them and then deleting it. Helloooo....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Except for the fact that she did already attempt to respond with that IG post about finally listening to the audio that she quickly deleted on Friday. So it would seem that she is not opposed to responding--she may be trying to craft another, presumably better, response.

Or it could be that she was faster than Peter at realizing that social media isn't where their marital problems belong. It could be anything really it just depends how cynical you are when reading into it.

Regardless Pete put her in a position where she HAS to respond eventually for her own sake... Not because she wants to ..lol she never asked for any of this to turn into public discussion

Leaving in the middle of the night and cleaning out the bank accounts, if true, guaranteed a public discussion just because Kane is a local celebrity. If you don't want people gossiping, don't do gossip worthy things. If she didn't do those things, I feel bad for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Except for the fact that she did already attempt to respond with that IG post about finally listening to the audio that she quickly deleted on Friday. So it would seem that she is not opposed to responding--she may be trying to craft another, presumably better, response.

Or it could be that she was faster than Peter at realizing that social media isn't where their marital problems belong. It could be anything really it just depends how cynical you are when reading into it.

Regardless Pete put her in a position where she HAS to respond eventually for her own sake... Not because she wants to ..lol she never asked for any of this to turn into public discussion

Leaving in the middle of the night and cleaning out the bank accounts, if true, guaranteed a public discussion just because Kane is a local celebrity. If you don't want people gossiping, don't do gossip worthy things. If she didn't do those things, I feel bad for her.

+1. Exactly. I think it's better he gave more details than might be necessary, or else, imagine how many more ridiculous theories people would be speculating about.

[Anonymous]

i love the Kane show!! MY MAN!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just wanted to chime in...I've Been following this thread for longer than is good for me...but it is so damn entertaining! And I feel like I've actually learned some important things about people. One of the biggest trends I picked up on is that regardless of whether or not you are a good person, most people will be cynical and assume the worst of you, even if they have no information to suggest such a conclusion. This has really been a great social experiment! I have to feel sorry for nat with all these haters that think they could have done a better job, when we don't even know what led to this! The most logical explanation is that sometimes no matter how hard you try, marriages don't work out and it's better to go your separate ways. And yet people have come up with the wildest fantasies like "she is hooking up with another sugar daddy " or "she was in it for the money all along"... If I were nat and IF I was a gold Digger like so many of you have claimed, trust me I would not have married a lowly local radio DJ hedging everything on the bet that he would eventually be nationally syndicated... That's not how gold digging works sorry..anyhow,

Carry on!

Hi Danni

Hi! Thanks for taking the time to read my post. It took awhile to write because I had to stop and pump about halfway through, but I make it a habit to finish anything I start. #workingmom#thestruggle
My Man!!

You just won the internet today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does it seem like he was trying for it exactly? Because he tweeted her?

This whole Mia theory is ridiculous...I've never even heard of her before this. She comes off as extremely irrelevant to the situation. Yawn.

You're wrong. It's not a Theory, she's a major part of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Except for the fact that she did already attempt to respond with that IG post about finally listening to the audio that she quickly deleted on Friday. So it would seem that she is not opposed to responding--she may be trying to craft another, presumably better, response.

Or it could be that she was faster than Peter at realizing that social media isn't where their marital problems belong. It could be anything really it just depends how cynical you are when reading into it.

Regardless Pete put her in a position where she HAS to respond eventually for her own sake... Not because she wants to ..lol she never asked for any of this to turn into public discussion

Are we forgetting that she is the one that posted an entire blog detailing their marital and personal problems in March/April? And then both of them went on to do a TV interview partially about it? I don't think we can deny that BOTH of them are equally addicted to the forum that social media provides for airing their grievances.

Uhhhh...her blog post was about how they had problems and how they worked through them and that there was light at the end of the tunnel...so I have to question whether you even bothered to read it because the majority of it is positive...and you are comparing it to Kane trashing her on air which was 100% negative.... Yea...try again...

Oh please. I stated that they both used the media to discuss their personal info. Whether you determine it to be good or bad info they are sharing is beside the point. You can't exploit your life on social media and then cry about the other person doing the same thing because they're not exploiting the "good" things. You also can't claim to take the high road when you're responding to them and then deleting it. Helloooo....

We all know that everyone uses social media, nothing new there...but you are essentially saying that because she posted 7 months ago about how she overcame the hurdles of marriage and was closer to her husband a s a result of it, that it somehow is analogous to Kane going on air and trashing her.
I'm not referring to my opinion, simply letting you know since you clearly didn't read her blog post that the subject was very clearly about how they got through their problems and about unconditional love and as well as how there was light at the end of the tunnel now that they worked through it... You would have to be a pretty shallow person to see that and say it's comparable in any way at all to Kane going on air and trashing her by saying "Natasha did this and this and this". Making her out to be a crazy woman and leaving it at that. I can't tell if your joking for the sake of trolling or if you are really that naive...lmao I guess someone is wearing their "My Man!" Shirt today

In case you skipped that like you did N's blog, essentially what I said is that her discussing 7 months ago how they overcame the hurdles in their marriage does not in any way translate to "turning her divorce into a public discussion" that was 100% Kane airing his dirty laundry. Which is why this discussion never started till after that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just wanted to chime in...I've Been following this thread for longer than is good for me...but it is so damn entertaining! And I feel like I've actually learned some important things about people. One of the biggest trends I picked up on is that regardless of whether or not you are a good person, most people will be cynical and assume the worst of you, even if they have no information to suggest such a conclusion. This has really been a great social experiment! I have to feel sorry for nat with all these haters that think they could have done a better job, when we don't even know what led to this! The most logical explanation is that sometimes no matter how hard you try, marriages don't work out and it's better to go your separate ways. And yet people have come up with the wildest fantasies like "she is hooking up with another sugar daddy " or "she was in it for the money all along"... If I were nat and IF I was a gold Digger like so many of you have claimed, trust me I would not have married a lowly local radio DJ hedging everything on the bet that he would eventually be nationally syndicated... That's not how gold digging works sorry..anyhow,

Carry on!

Hi Danni

Hi! Thanks for taking the time to read my post. It took awhile to write because I had to stop and pump about halfway through, but I make it a habit to finish anything I start. #workingmom#thestruggle
My Man!!

You just won the internet today.

+1 I laughed so hard