Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice how this morning on the show they were talking about how a woman wrote in about her workaholic husband? It sounded coincidentally similar to Kane's situation. John even said something about how being a workaholic was OK because he was sure the wife enjoyed all the money he was bringing in.

I think it's rude that P keeps airing his dirty laundry on air... he never once named N but the situation sure sounded similar. I texted in to the show saying that Kane's true colors were showing and it was unattractive and I got nasty texts back from John AND DANNI! I'm starting to find them all annoying...

Wouldn't surprise me in the least if it was all made up story to let Kane take his passive aggressive jabs at nat. He knows he can't outright talk about it on the air anymore especially after that huge slip on Friday or it's going to hurt him in divorce court...

If you've worked in healthcare with OCD people, then you know that the disorder is ego-dystonic. That is, their behavior is inconsistent with their own beliefs (even if they subconsciously don't want to do it they HAVE to). And because of this they can unintentionally make their lives and the lives of those around them a nightmare. This has probably been a long time coming and if nat making the first move is what it took than good for her. I'm sure they will both be happier apart and raising their girls, instead of trying to force making living together work.

definitely. they're going to bring up "stories" so he can talk about his problems and validate himself without using their names

[Anonymous]

I just noticed N replied to one of the mean comments on IG 2 days ago..

Somebody: I think you are conniving and planned this whole thing. You should have put your children first. You don't just drain bank accts and just leave. Grow up and do it with dignity
N: were you here? You have no idea what REALLY happens in anyone's home unless you're there..it's comments like these that really bum me out that people just take something someone says on an entertainment show as truth. Because it isn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kane sneaking down to Florida to see Mia Khalifa after John hooked them up is a major piece to all of this mess. The fact that none of you know this or have brought it up shows just how sadly inaccurate the speculation on this whole thread is.

Explain. People saw the divorcing filing online, what other proof does one need?

Yes, the filing is real, I didn't write that it wasn't, learn to read. I wrote that no one knows the real reason on here or has even mentioned his relationship with Mia Khalifa & his trips to Florida to see her, which is a major factor in the divorce.

how do you know ?!

[Anonymous]

N actually responded to an IG comment two days ago. You can basically infer that P didn't tell the whole truth and was saying a lot of what he said for entertainment. She also said that no one would really know what it was like unless they were there.

Straight from the proverbial horses' mouth, and pretty telling of her feelings.

[Anonymous]

Why is Rose even on the show? She contributes NOTHING and just agrees with Danni all the time. I just wanna call her Gummy bear

[Anonymous]

Reading this all the way from South Dakota.... thanks for all the entertainment and info

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is Rose even on the show? She contributes NOTHING and just agrees with Danni all the time. I just wanna call her Gummy bear

she also hardly ever talks unless kane speaks to her/asks her about her love life or whatever. which is always boring. she serves no purpose!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha doesn't even need to get a job she's going to be getting more money from alimony and child support than most posters on here are probably making themselves... No wonder everyone is jealous lol... Jk I'm sure the judge will say she has to get one since she is young.... I wouldn't be surprised if Kane lets her keep the house though, if only for the sake of normalcy for the girls

That would be the right thing to do, especially cause she gave up her career to raise them

Ok....ok....can't breathe. ....laughing so hard! Pray tell. ....what was her career, exactly? Finding a sugar daddy? I guess you're right! Haha haha haha

She worked in the radio(fairly certain) industry before they had kids... Maybe you should do some research before you mindlessly put someone down just because you can post anonymously

Apparently she got fired from one job that she had while living here, probably the only one. Not surprised.

http://www.littlepinkmonster.com/2009/05/11/extreme-makeover-samster-edition/

This week we’re starting two major makeovers in my house. One, I’m moving Sam out of her current nursery (see below)and am redecorating the room across the hall to be her new room.The pic above is a sitting room/upstairs office that’s off of our bedroom. When she was a newborn I couldn’t stand the thought of her being a whopping 15ft across the hall so this way she was in our room without really being IN our room. (and yes, I painted each and every one of those freaking stripes. It took me two weeks but it was also pre-Sam and right after I got fired from a crappy job that I couldn’t believe they fired me from before I could quit.)

LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Rose even on the show? She contributes NOTHING and just agrees with Danni all the time. I just wanna call her Gummy bear

she also hardly ever talks unless kane speaks to her/asks her about her love life or whatever. which is always boring. she serves no purpose!

Unless Kane hits on her****
always complimenting her, talking about how "beautiful" she is, saying hes protective of her going on dates, etc etc etc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Rose even on the show? She contributes NOTHING and just agrees with Danni all the time. I just wanna call her Gummy bear

she also hardly ever talks unless kane speaks to her/asks her about her love life or whatever. which is always boring. she serves no purpose!

Not trying to defend her, but it would probably be tough knowing when to interject in a conversation when you're in different state from the rest of the show. I'm sure they have video, but it's not the same as being in the same room.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Rose even on the show? She contributes NOTHING and just agrees with Danni all the time. I just wanna call her Gummy bear

she also hardly ever talks unless kane speaks to her/asks her about her love life or whatever. which is always boring. she serves no purpose!

Not trying to defend her, but it would probably be tough knowing when to interject in a conversation when you're in different state from the rest of the show. I'm sure they have video, but it's not the same as being in the same room.

Yea, so why even have her on it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Rose even on the show? She contributes NOTHING and just agrees with Danni all the time. I just wanna call her Gummy bear

she also hardly ever talks unless kane speaks to her/asks her about her love life or whatever. which is always boring. she serves no purpose!

Not trying to defend her, but it would probably be tough knowing when to interject in a conversation when you're in different state from the rest of the show. I'm sure they have video, but it's not the same as being in the same room.

Yea, so why even have her on it.

I can only speak to my experience, but Danni REALLY turns me off, so I was hopeful that I would like Rose. I ultimately stopped listening to the show. I wonder if they have Rose to balance the male/female ratio of the show and to have a female besides Danni for female listeners to connect with. If they only had 1 woman it may feel like a bunch of bros.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:N actually responded to an IG comment two days ago. You can basically infer that P didn't tell the whole truth and was saying a lot of what he said for entertainment. She also said that no one would really know what it was like unless they were there.

Straight from the proverbial horses' mouth, and pretty telling of her feelings.

Telling of her feelings, I guess, but not telling of the whole situation. Neither is really to be believed over the other at this point. Did she not drain ALL the accounts and so that's his fabrication, that it was really some and not all? Did she take half the money and so he wasn't exact in saying she fully drained the accounts? Did she not take any money and all of what he said was BS? Yeah, so we still don't know sh*t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Except for the fact that she did already attempt to respond with that IG post about finally listening to the audio that she quickly deleted on Friday. So it would seem that she is not opposed to responding--she may be trying to craft another, presumably better, response.

Or it could be that she was faster than Peter at realizing that social media isn't where their marital problems belong. It could be anything really it just depends how cynical you are when reading into it.

Regardless Pete put her in a position where she HAS to respond eventually for her own sake... Not because she wants to ..lol she never asked for any of this to turn into public discussion

Are we forgetting that she is the one that posted an entire blog detailing their marital and personal problems in March/April? And then both of them went on to do a TV interview partially about it? I don't think we can deny that BOTH of them are equally addicted to the forum that social media provides for airing their grievances.

Uhhhh...her blog post was about how they had problems and how they worked through them and that there was light at the end of the tunnel...so I have to question whether you even bothered to read it because the majority of it is positive...and you are comparing it to Kane trashing her on air which was 100% negative.... Yea...try again...

Oh please. I stated that they both used the media to discuss their personal info. Whether you determine it to be good or bad info they are sharing is beside the point. You can't exploit your life on social media and then cry about the other person doing the same thing because they're not exploiting the "good" things. You also can't claim to take the high road when you're responding to them and then deleting it. Helloooo....

We all know that everyone uses social media, nothing new there...but you are essentially saying that because she posted 7 months ago about how she overcame the hurdles of marriage and was closer to her husband a s a result of it, that it somehow is analogous to Kane going on air and trashing her.
I'm not referring to my opinion, simply letting you know since you clearly didn't read her blog post that the subject was very clearly about how they got through their problems and about unconditional love and as well as how there was light at the end of the tunnel now that they worked through it... You would have to be a pretty shallow person to see that and say it's comparable in any way at all to Kane going on air and trashing her by saying "Natasha did this and this and this". Making her out to be a crazy woman and leaving it at that. I can't tell if your joking for the sake of trolling or if you are really that naive...lmao I guess someone is wearing their "My Man!" Shirt today

In case you skipped that like you did N's blog, essentially what I said is that her discussing 7 months ago how they overcame the hurdles in their marriage does not in any way translate to "turning her divorce into a public discussion" that was 100% Kane airing his dirty laundry. Which is why this discussion never started till after that.

Jees, you're annoying me and I actually have kept up with her blog. In fact, you keep accusing someone of not reading her blog and therefore knowing nothing but you keep writing that Natasha put up the marriage blogpost 7 months ago but it was actually back in February. So maybe you're not the perfect smarty pants that you think you are. In the past, Natasha actually has related issues she has with Peter and on the flip side Peter has praised their marriage repeatedly. They've both said good stuff publicly, they've both said bad stuff publicly. In the end though, they're both getting divorced, so what's your point of keeping score?

The previous poster's point was that both of them have been public about their marriage throughout the years and that holds true, like it or not. And no, everyone does not use social media when it comes to their marriage--neither me nor my spouse ever comment about our marriage online. I don't even know why I'm bothering to respond, you seem pretty irrational and immature and I'm probably just adding fuel to the flames for you to comment something else unreasonable and annoying.

[Anonymous]

Reading this page all the way from South Dakota. Enjoyed all the information shared here. I love Kane, listen to him daily.