Zohran Mamdani...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both Mossad and CIA are historically very, very evil.

They are very, very effective in protecting their respective countries. You'd characterize them as "evil" only if you dislike those countries and the values they represent.

This is really an incredibly ignorant and laughable comment that ignores all the work the CIA has done to enable the MIC to be engaged in perpetual war and for our government to exploit other countries. Absolutely nothing to do with self defense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The reason why zohran won is because most democrats are extremely out of touch and he knows what people care about and how to appeal to that.

Even when his actual solutions are terrible, he is the only one actually trying to find one.

This is so spot on, PP.

[Anonymous]

Mamdani seems to be getting the Corbyn treatment but Mamdani is much better at contextualising the issue.

When he responds to the question "Do you support a Jewish state?" And says "I believe in a society where everyone is equal" not only does it flip the assumptions upside down, it forces zionists into defending apartheid or justify unequal rights.

[Anonymous]

The bbb is going to help him win. Medicaid cuts will have a huge impact on nyc in particular. Half the city’s on Medicaid

[Anonymous]

I don’t think the establishment realizes that people love Mamdani’s ideas about expanding social services because it’s been gutted for so long.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Both Mossad and CIA are historically very, very evil.

They’re the same entity. CIA started in 1948.

Jfk figured that out and wanted to end the cia. Putin knows it too.

A us Russian friendship is vastly against Israeli interest. Blabbermouth Bibi even said it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the establishment realizes that people love Mamdani’s ideas about expanding social services because it’s been gutted for so long.

Exactly. The giveaway to billionaires is so blatant that you’d have to be blind to not see it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mamdani seems to be getting the Corbyn treatment but Mamdani is much better at contextualising the issue.

When he responds to the question "Do you support a Jewish state?" And says "I believe in a society where everyone is equal" not only does it flip the assumptions upside down, it forces zionists into defending apartheid or justify unequal rights.

Contextualizing? That's what you call it?
He sidesteps the question. He doesn't answer the question. He gives a broad response that does not answer the question.
Like his non-answer when asked if he supports "globalizing the intifada."
He has been well trained by his handlers to avoid those tough questions and give a broad statement with a smile.
IOW - he is a fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mamdani seems to be getting the Corbyn treatment but Mamdani is much better at contextualising the issue.

When he responds to the question "Do you support a Jewish state?" And says "I believe in a society where everyone is equal" not only does it flip the assumptions upside down, it forces zionists into defending apartheid or justify unequal rights.

No, it just doesn't answer the question, instead making an unresponsive statement which is in itself not controversial. Answering the question would harm him politically, so he doesn't answer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mamdani seems to be getting the Corbyn treatment but Mamdani is much better at contextualising the issue.

When he responds to the question "Do you support a Jewish state?" And says "I believe in a society where everyone is equal" not only does it flip the assumptions upside down, it forces zionists into defending apartheid or justify unequal rights.

No, it just doesn't answer the question, instead making an unresponsive statement which is in itself not controversial. Answering the question would harm him politically, so he doesn't answer.

Seems pretty clear to me. Apartheid ethnosupremicism is bad. Equality for all good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s a gift to the GOP.

Elect this guy and just continue to allow the GOP to win elections. The political ads write themselves

Indeed. AOC and Mamdani are the most radical crazies, and Democrats are sucking up the garbage.

The radical crazies are the ones that are against AOC and Mamdani. Nothing they are saying is radical. The Dems and Repubs have provided nothing but Reaganomics on steroids for the past 40 years. A bit of socialism is needed

Taking over the means of production?
Opening government grocery stores?
etc.

The panic over government-owned stores is hilarious. How many government-owned-and-operated liquor stores are in the US? Six grocery stores does not a communist state make.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mamdani seems to be getting the Corbyn treatment but Mamdani is much better at contextualising the issue.

When he responds to the question "Do you support a Jewish state?" And says "I believe in a society where everyone is equal" not only does it flip the assumptions upside down, it forces zionists into defending apartheid or justify unequal rights.

No, it just doesn't answer the question, instead making an unresponsive statement which is in itself not controversial. Answering the question would harm him politically, so he doesn't answer.

Seems pretty clear to me. Apartheid ethnosupremicism is bad. Equality for all good.

That's you speaking, and why you'll never be elected to public office. He's not answering.

[Anonymous]

As a result of colonialism, Indians dominated Uganda's economy, particularly in trade and commerce. They owned a significant portion of businesses and contributed substantially to tax revenue. This economic prominence led to resentment and anti-Indian sentiment among some native Ugandans, especially as African entrepreneurs sought opportunities in the economy and civil service that were largely held by Indians.

[Anonymous]

But Professor Mamdani knows better, he teaches about settler colonialism in a different way. Which Z seems to agree with, as a nepo baby will wisely do if he doesn't earn his own money.

[Anonymous]

Trump, Cuomo and Adams are weaponizing Mamdani as an anti-semite for their own political purposes. Thee non-Jews. Don't fall for it.