Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now

[Anonymous]

I honestly think Natasha may have interest in someone else, but hadn't acted on it or anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm willing to bet she's gonna do it when "everything calms down". But I think she will tip toe around the actual story, just mentiones here and there, leaving the reader wanting more of course. That way she boosts her number of people reading her blog.

She hasn't been tiptoeing around anything... In fact she has been remarkably quiet in regards to the divorce, props to her. Too bad Kane doesn't have her resolve

no, she is definitely tiptoeing... saying "i'll be back to blogging tomorrow" (please, her normal posting schedule was 4 times/yr!) is one example.

You're really grasping at straws here to support your conspiracy theory lol... Between January and March she blogged 3 times... It has been months since she updated her blog so it makes sense that she would update it soon...timewise it even fits into the allowable 4/yr that you suggested...I'm sure there is more going on in her life besides Kane's embarrassing revelations...believe it or not she still has a life and 2 girls at home that I'm sure are keeping her busy.

[Anonymous]

MoCo loves Mia!!! Kane could not say no!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just wanted to chime in...I've Been following this thread for longer than is good for me...but it is so damn entertaining! And I feel like I've actually learned some important things about people. One of the biggest trends I picked up on is that regardless of whether or not you are a good person, most people will be cynical and assume the worst of you, even if they have no information to suggest such a conclusion. This has really been a great social experiment! I have to feel sorry for nat with all these haters that think they could have done a better job, when we don't even know what led to this! The most logical explanation is that sometimes no matter how hard you try, marriages don't work out and it's better to go your separate ways. And yet people have come up with the wildest fantasies like "she is hooking up with another sugar daddy " or "she was in it for the money all along"... If I were nat and IF I was a gold Digger like so many of you have claimed, trust me I would not have married a lowly local radio DJ hedging everything on the bet that he would eventually be nationally syndicated... That's not how gold digging works sorry..anyhow,

Carry on!

Hi Danni

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MoCo loves Mia!!! Kane could not say no!!

Yuck /gag

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just wanted to chime in...I've Been following this thread for longer than is good for me...but it is so damn entertaining! And I feel like I've actually learned some important things about people. One of the biggest trends I picked up on is that regardless of whether or not you are a good person, most people will be cynical and assume the worst of you, even if they have no information to suggest such a conclusion. This has really been a great social experiment! I have to feel sorry for nat with all these haters that think they could have done a better job, when we don't even know what led to this! The most logical explanation is that sometimes no matter how hard you try, marriages don't work out and it's better to go your separate ways. And yet people have come up with the wildest fantasies like "she is hooking up with another sugar daddy " or "she was in it for the money all along"... If I were nat and IF I was a gold Digger like so many of you have claimed, trust me I would not have married a lowly local radio DJ hedging everything on the bet that he would eventually be nationally syndicated... That's not how gold digging works sorry..anyhow,

Carry on!

Hi Danni

LOL!

[Anonymous]

Except for the fact that she did already attempt to respond with that IG post about finally listening to the audio that she quickly deleted on Friday. So it would seem that she is not opposed to responding--she may be trying to craft another, presumably better, response.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just wanted to chime in...I've Been following this thread for longer than is good for me...but it is so damn entertaining! And I feel like I've actually learned some important things about people. One of the biggest trends I picked up on is that regardless of whether or not you are a good person, most people will be cynical and assume the worst of you, even if they have no information to suggest such a conclusion. This has really been a great social experiment! I have to feel sorry for nat with all these haters that think they could have done a better job, when we don't even know what led to this! The most logical explanation is that sometimes no matter how hard you try, marriages don't work out and it's better to go your separate ways. And yet people have come up with the wildest fantasies like "she is hooking up with another sugar daddy " or "she was in it for the money all along"... If I were nat and IF I was a gold Digger like so many of you have claimed, trust me I would not have married a lowly local radio DJ hedging everything on the bet that he would eventually be nationally syndicated... That's not how gold digging works sorry..anyhow,

Carry on!

Hi Danni

Hi! Thanks for taking the time to read my post. It took awhile to write because I had to stop and pump about halfway through, but I make it a habit to finish anything I start. #workingmom#thestruggle
My Man!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just wanted to chime in...I've Been following this thread for longer than is good for me...but it is so damn entertaining! And I feel like I've actually learned some important things about people. One of the biggest trends I picked up on is that regardless of whether or not you are a good person, most people will be cynical and assume the worst of you, even if they have no information to suggest such a conclusion. This has really been a great social experiment! I have to feel sorry for nat with all these haters that think they could have done a better job, when we don't even know what led to this! The most logical explanation is that sometimes no matter how hard you try, marriages don't work out and it's better to go your separate ways. And yet people have come up with the wildest fantasies like "she is hooking up with another sugar daddy " or "she was in it for the money all along"... If I were nat and IF I was a gold Digger like so many of you have claimed, trust me I would not have married a lowly local radio DJ hedging everything on the bet that he would eventually be nationally syndicated... That's not how gold digging works sorry..anyhow,

Carry on!

Hi Danni

Hi! Thanks for taking the time to read my post. It took awhile to write because I had to stop and pump about halfway through, but I make it a habit to finish anything I start. #workingmom#thestruggle
My Man!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Except for the fact that she did already attempt to respond with that IG post about finally listening to the audio that she quickly deleted on Friday. So it would seem that she is not opposed to responding--she may be trying to craft another, presumably better, response.

Or it could be that she was faster than Peter at realizing that social media isn't where their marital problems belong. It could be anything really it just depends how cynical you are when reading into it.

Regardless Pete put her in a position where she HAS to respond eventually for her own sake... Not because she wants to ..lol she never asked for any of this to turn into public discussion

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just wanted to chime in...I've Been following this thread for longer than is good for me...but it is so damn entertaining! And I feel like I've actually learned some important things about people. One of the biggest trends I picked up on is that regardless of whether or not you are a good person, most people will be cynical and assume the worst of you, even if they have no information to suggest such a conclusion. This has really been a great social experiment! I have to feel sorry for nat with all these haters that think they could have done a better job, when we don't even know what led to this! The most logical explanation is that sometimes no matter how hard you try, marriages don't work out and it's better to go your separate ways. And yet people have come up with the wildest fantasies like "she is hooking up with another sugar daddy " or "she was in it for the money all along"... If I were nat and IF I was a gold Digger like so many of you have claimed, trust me I would not have married a lowly local radio DJ hedging everything on the bet that he would eventually be nationally syndicated... That's not how gold digging works sorry..anyhow,

Carry on!

Exactly!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Roses on Natasha seems like SUCH a great idea!

Like she wouldn't just hang up on you losers....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How does it seem like he was trying for it exactly? Because he tweeted her?

This whole Mia theory is ridiculous...I've never even heard of her before this. She comes off as extremely irrelevant to the situation. Yawn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Except for the fact that she did already attempt to respond with that IG post about finally listening to the audio that she quickly deleted on Friday. So it would seem that she is not opposed to responding--she may be trying to craft another, presumably better, response.

Or it could be that she was faster than Peter at realizing that social media isn't where their marital problems belong. It could be anything really it just depends how cynical you are when reading into it.

Regardless Pete put her in a position where she HAS to respond eventually for her own sake... Not because she wants to ..lol she never asked for any of this to turn into public discussion

Are we forgetting that she is the one that posted an entire blog detailing their marital and personal problems in March/April? And then both of them went on to do a TV interview partially about it? I don't think we can deny that BOTH of them are equally addicted to the forum that social media provides for airing their grievances.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Except for the fact that she did already attempt to respond with that IG post about finally listening to the audio that she quickly deleted on Friday. So it would seem that she is not opposed to responding--she may be trying to craft another, presumably better, response.

Ugh, I really wish I had seen this post! Can we make a rule that whenever she puts up an IG post we screenshot it in case this happens again? Is that too creepy of a rule? I mean we are 115 pages into this thread!