GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Merchant sure is busy defending her one client. But an office that is working on 18 simultaneous cases (as well as the rest of the normal caseload)? They have "intentionally" withheld documents rather than just being busy?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Funny you guys didn’t have a problem with that when Ken Paxton did it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Merchant sure is busy defending her one client. But an office that is working on 18 simultaneous cases (as well as the rest of the normal caseload)? They have "intentionally" withheld documents rather than just being busy?

Maybe the "office" should have considered the workload before rushing to bring charges against 18 defendants simultaneously in what appears to be a politically motivated prosecution. It was Fani Willis herself who wanted to "expedite" these trials. Maybe if the "office" cannot adequately prosecute the cases then 1) they have bit off more than they can chew 2) they are incompetent 3) they have weak cases or 4) all of the above.

Let me grab my tiny violin for Fani and her crew.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Merchant sure is busy defending her one client. But an office that is working on 18 simultaneous cases (as well as the rest of the normal caseload)? They have "intentionally" withheld documents rather than just being busy?

I honestly can't believe you're going to bring up how "busy" they are...but yes, you're correct that Fani Willis and Wade have been extremely busy!!

[Anonymous]

All of you perverts salivating at a sex scandal are wholly creepy. I include posters from all political sides.

Meanwhile, the wheels of justice will grind slowly but surely for Trump and his band of co-conspirators.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
All of you perverts salivating at a sex scandal are wholly creepy. I include posters from all political sides.

Meanwhile, the wheels of justice will grind slowly but surely for Trump and his band of co-conspirators.

I couldn't care less who Fani chooses to bang.

When she hires the guy she is banging, pays him more than other prosecutors even though he is less qualified, then he uses that compensation to take her on trips - there is a problem. And, when that guy meets with WH counsel - not once, but twice..... there is even more of a problem.

And, then when she goes to the pulpit to proclaim that anyone who dares to question her ethics are racist for doing so.... well, SHE has a problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Merchant sure is busy defending her one client. But an office that is working on 18 simultaneous cases (as well as the rest of the normal caseload)? They have "intentionally" withheld documents rather than just being busy?

Maybe the "office" should have considered the workload before rushing to bring charges against 18 defendants simultaneously in what appears to be a politically motivated prosecution. It was Fani Willis herself who wanted to "expedite" these trials. Maybe if the "office" cannot adequately prosecute the cases then 1) they have bit off more than they can chew 2) they are incompetent 3) they have weak cases or 4) all of the above.

Let me grab my tiny violin for Fani and her crew.

How? How does it appear to be politically motivated?

Is tampering with voting okay to you because it happened in Georgia? Do you have some rationale that makes this okay?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Merchant sure is busy defending her one client. But an office that is working on 18 simultaneous cases (as well as the rest of the normal caseload)? They have "intentionally" withheld documents rather than just being busy?

Maybe the "office" should have considered the workload before rushing to bring charges against 18 defendants simultaneously in what appears to be a politically motivated prosecution. It was Fani Willis herself who wanted to "expedite" these trials. Maybe if the "office" cannot adequately prosecute the cases then 1) they have bit off more than they can chew 2) they are incompetent 3) they have weak cases or 4) all of the above.

Let me grab my tiny violin for Fani and her crew.

How? How does it appear to be politically motivated?

Is tampering with voting okay to you because it happened in Georgia? Do you have some rationale that makes this okay?

No, it is absolutely NOT okay; and it's why we needed those working on the case to view it as important and not be screwing around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
All of you perverts salivating at a sex scandal are wholly creepy. I include posters from all political sides.

Meanwhile, the wheels of justice will grind slowly but surely for Trump and his band of co-conspirators.

For the whole 5 years.

[Anonymous]

Wow... An actually crime.

[Anonymous]

Well, she's stealing your money, so it's up to you what you do. Georgia.

[Anonymous]

Looks like Fani might be on the receiving side of a prosecution. Wonder if she will choose to defend herself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Fani might be on the receiving side of a prosecution. Wonder if she will choose to defend herself.

She should hire the Nathan's Hotdog since he is supposed to be a 'Super Star' lawyer.