| AI reads. Ugh. Gut calls are more accurate for HS lax (I think). It’s like Maxpreps national rankings. Not remotely accurate. |
It isn’t an AI interpretation it’s simply using the data. A human with a bit more time and Excel would derive the same predictions. Which also are mostly the same as the human predictions. Your human interpretation was pretty dumb. |
These are high school boys. |
| Scores from tonight? |
Yorktown won by a lot. Couldn’t tell from NFHS (terrible stream) |
|
Dumb? Ha.
Yeah, I am human. Proud of it. Don’t let machines take you over friend. This is hs lax, not predictive modeling. Anyway… scores from tonight? |
Data is data. |
No it’s not. These are kids. |
That's really not how data works. Scores against opponents is absolutely a viable method to have game predictions/expectations. It's the dumbest of hills to climb up on and die on when the data is pretty dang similar in predictions to the sole human's predictions provided. |
Ashburn parent |
| Herndon 15-7 |
These are not intelligent people you’re arguing with. Let it go. |
The human missed the Centreville at Herndon game for a prediction, LaxNumbers data says Herndon wins by 1. |
LaxNumbers has 15-10, fwiw. |
| Who are the standout attack defense and goalies so far through this season? |