Kate's New Picture

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn't Rose also married?


Her DH is reportedly gay.


Her children are rumored to have been fathered by some one else


Her twins are older than Prince George. If they are really Willy's then they'd be 3rd & 4th in line.


Nope. Illegitimate kids don't count.


They could if the monarch decided they should.


And unicorns are real.



No, unicorns are fake. But monarchs can make changes to the line of succession. QEII changed the rules so that girls would succeed over their younger brothers, for instance. That's why Charlotte is 3rd in line in line, before Louis, but Anne comes behind her younger brothers.


No. That would be Parliament, which made the change in 2013.

Amazing that people speak so authoritatively when they are just making things up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think the pic was pre-surgery, and I am not sure why she insists on taking her own pics and editing them. She's not a pro, and that's ok. My guess is she looks like crap right now, bloated from steroids, and doesn't want people to see her that way. But of course it backfired spectacularly due to all the crazy conspiracy theorists out there.


Why so much photoshopping of the kids' clothes when that would raise red flags? Why imply it was a photo from 2024?


Perhaps she’s unwell mentally akin to Britney at the moment. Nothing makes sense to us that makes sense to her.
Anonymous
You'd think a happily married couple would make a point of looking at each other lovingly, smiling, etc. if they knew they were about to be papped in the car when they hadn't been seen together in months and rumors are flying about the state of their marriage. Kate turning away from her husband and looking at the wall was... something.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn't Rose also married?


Her DH is reportedly gay.


DP. I doubt he's gay because he's spent most of his life dating a string of celeb women, singers, and such. He might be bi. Also he spends a lot of time at his Paris digs because he fancies himself a film maker or something.

I have no clue whether William and Rose are getting it on, though. Maybe, maybe not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You'd think a happily married couple would make a point of looking at each other lovingly, smiling, etc. if they knew they were about to be papped in the car when they hadn't been seen together in months and rumors are flying about the state of their marriage. Kate turning away from her husband and looking at the wall was... something.


Yes. Even if she didn't want to show her face, they could have had her sitting on the photographer side, looking at William and William looking back with a smile.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn't Rose also married?


Her DH is reportedly gay.


Her children are rumored to have been fathered by some one else


Her twins are older than Prince George. If they are really Willy's then they'd be 3rd & 4th in line.


Nope. Illegitimate kids don't count.


They could if the monarch decided they should.


And unicorns are real.



No, unicorns are fake. But monarchs can make changes to the line of succession. QEII changed the rules so that girls would succeed over their younger brothers, for instance. That's why Charlotte is 3rd in line in line, before Louis, but Anne comes behind her younger brothers.


No. That would be Parliament, which made the change in 2013.

Amazing that people speak so authoritatively when they are just making things up.


Yup.

As much or more to the point, all of this concern trolling is predicated on the idea that William is abusive and screwing a particular other woman — despite no evidence of the former, and the person most responsible for the affair rumor living on Twitter, Giles Coren, stating later that he made it up. Where is the in-print objective evidence that this stuff underlying these acidic rumors is at all true? Where?
Anonymous
what do people think is wrong with Kate? I don’t think Crohns is even something that you have to hide. Something is very off.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think the pic was pre-surgery, and I am not sure why she insists on taking her own pics and editing them. She's not a pro, and that's ok. My guess is she looks like crap right now, bloated from steroids, and doesn't want people to see her that way. But of course it backfired spectacularly due to all the crazy conspiracy theorists out there.


Why so much photoshopping of the kids' clothes when that would raise red flags? Why imply it was a photo from 2024?


Not "imply," say. They said it was taken last week by PW in the caption. That was just a flabbergasting lie if it's an old photo.


It did not actually say that, it said "2024" which could be interpreted as a photo for MD 2024. It did not say, "Taken in March 2024" for example.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:what do people think is wrong with Kate? I don’t think Crohns is even something that you have to hide. Something is very off.


I think she really did have a medical procedure as stated, but whatever is going on now has nothing to do with that. I'm thinking they are negotiating a split.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You'd think a happily married couple would make a point of looking at each other lovingly, smiling, etc. if they knew they were about to be papped in the car when they hadn't been seen together in months and rumors are flying about the state of their marriage. Kate turning away from her husband and looking at the wall was... something.


If she was unhappy about being photographed before the stated time she would return could be a way to give the bare minimum and nothing to do with William at all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You'd think a happily married couple would make a point of looking at each other lovingly, smiling, etc. if they knew they were about to be papped in the car when they hadn't been seen together in months and rumors are flying about the state of their marriage. Kate turning away from her husband and looking at the wall was... something.


I would think even an UNHAPPILY married couple would do this in this specific scenario. If I were Kate and actually devastated about something/wanting to be left alone, I would be going out of my way to create one genuine non manufactured moment to get everyone off my back. I certainly wouldn't go about it in a way 100% designed to make the situation even worse.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think the pic was pre-surgery, and I am not sure why she insists on taking her own pics and editing them. She's not a pro, and that's ok. My guess is she looks like crap right now, bloated from steroids, and doesn't want people to see her that way. But of course it backfired spectacularly due to all the crazy conspiracy theorists out there.


Why so much photoshopping of the kids' clothes when that would raise red flags? Why imply it was a photo from 2024?


I think she's just not great at photoshop, had to photoshop swollen hands too...Nobody wants to see her looking big or bad in any way. I think about that sometimes: people like her or Jackie O., 20lbs heavier, wouldn't have been liked at all, or married who they did. The pressure to look perfect is real.


What I don't get is, why was everybody photoshopped?
- if they used a November 2023 photo, it was because she looked normal (no puffy hands or face yet). In this scenario, they'd avoid the need to photoshop Kate's face and hands. But they would need to photoshop the kids' clothes so people wouldn't suspect they were passing off an old photo.
- if they used a current photo, then maybe they'd photoshop Kate's face and hands to reduce puffiness. But then the kids could wear different clothes and there'd be no reason to photoshop the kids.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think the pic was pre-surgery, and I am not sure why she insists on taking her own pics and editing them. She's not a pro, and that's ok. My guess is she looks like crap right now, bloated from steroids, and doesn't want people to see her that way. But of course it backfired spectacularly due to all the crazy conspiracy theorists out there.


Why so much photoshopping of the kids' clothes when that would raise red flags? Why imply it was a photo from 2024?


Perhaps she’s unwell mentally akin to Britney at the moment. Nothing makes sense to us that makes sense to her.


Bipolar sets in at much younger ages. She was seen in public in late December, interacting with the public, etc. I do not genuinely believe that it was Catherine editing the photo. Gullible much?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why do you all think the littlest boy has his fingers crossed in the pMD picture?


Short answer - for the sensory input. Beyond that, let’s not speculate about a child.

Conspiracy theory - what if Kate actually did choose this photo to show no ring on her finger and one kid crossing his fingers to suggest the whole thing is a sham?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You'd think a happily married couple would make a point of looking at each other lovingly, smiling, etc. if they knew they were about to be papped in the car when they hadn't been seen together in months and rumors are flying about the state of their marriage. Kate turning away from her husband and looking at the wall was... something.


I would think even an UNHAPPILY married couple would do this in this specific scenario. If I were Kate and actually devastated about something/wanting to be left alone, I would be going out of my way to create one genuine non manufactured moment to get everyone off my back. I certainly wouldn't go about it in a way 100% designed to make the situation even worse.


A "proof of life" photo was demanded and provided. But, the goalposts are always moving, eh? She was looking away from the PHOTOGRAPHER too. That was the likely statement. They had conveyed she would return to public appearances after Easter, not on 3/11.

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: