Warren now the most likely nominee according to some betting markets

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the low-information voter, and there are many, Warren is Hillary 2.0. If she's the front-runner we'll have Trump for another 4 years... or even longer...

For anyone over 40– nope. And BTW, not all 60-70 year old smart white women are the same. Warren did not break into the national scene by saying she wasn’t going to just stay home and break cookies, then fail to overhaul health care, then deal with Monica and the dress.

HRC has very different, much more moderate politics. A real inability to connect with the working class that Warren has shown in spades. And mostly doesn’t have 20 years of pure hatred by half the country, including many independents to overcome.

There is a pete supporting woman i know who refuses to vote for warren because she reminds her of hrc and the old white female managers she's had in her life.

I"ve heard this from a number of mid 40's- mid 50's women who are dems - that they don't like Warren because she reminds them of a micromanaging boss that they've had in the past

This could be bigger than many imagine. The tendency of older women to treat their younger colleagues with smug sadism has been all too common.

Wow. Sexism and ageism all rolled into one tidy reason not to vote for a woman candidate. Nice try. But all older women bosses aren’t smug sadists. And when men display the exact same behavior, it’s called a tough management style, right?

EW and Biden should drop out of the race.

And Bernie too, right? He’s older than both of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the low-information voter, and there are many, Warren is Hillary 2.0. If she's the front-runner we'll have Trump for another 4 years... or even longer...

For anyone over 40– nope. And BTW, not all 60-70 year old smart white women are the same. Warren did not break into the national scene by saying she wasn’t going to just stay home and break cookies, then fail to overhaul health care, then deal with Monica and the dress.

HRC has very different, much more moderate politics. A real inability to connect with the working class that Warren has shown in spades. And mostly doesn’t have 20 years of pure hatred by half the country, including many independents to overcome.

There is a pete supporting woman i know who refuses to vote for warren because she reminds her of hrc and the old white female managers she's had in her life.

I"ve heard this from a number of mid 40's- mid 50's women who are dems - that they don't like Warren because she reminds them of a micromanaging boss that they've had in the past

This could be bigger than many imagine. The tendency of older women to treat their younger colleagues with smug sadism has been all too common.

Wow. Sexism and ageism all rolled into one tidy reason not to vote for a woman candidate. Nice try. But all older women bosses aren’t smug sadists. And when men display the exact same behavior, it’s called a tough management style, right?

Poor reading comprehension AND projection, all in the same reply! Nice work, PP! Trump has a good chance is thanks to people like you who think politics is about affirming yourself when it’s actually about gaining others’ trust. Maybe you and your ilk don’t actually care about others?

Who trusts Trump, exactly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I do not trust Warren with the pocohantas, switching from R to D, backing HRC and now pretending to be some progressive, flip flopping on Medicare for all and receiving money from non-individual donors while pretending to act as if she doesn’t. The deception and inconsistencies are almost endless. No integrity at all.

Your typical politician pretending to be a fighter against the establishment. She is a HRC 2.0 only slightly better and she will lose to Trump big time. She won’t get much support from progressives or black and Asian voters if she becomes the nominee less than Hillary.

I agree with you.

On the surface I liked her, so I started learning more about her proposals, her past books...and was very disappointed.

Her ethics are better than HRC's, but she's equally phony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the low-information voter, and there are many, Warren is Hillary 2.0. If she's the front-runner we'll have Trump for another 4 years... or even longer...

For anyone over 40– nope. And BTW, not all 60-70 year old smart white women are the same. Warren did not break into the national scene by saying she wasn’t going to just stay home and break cookies, then fail to overhaul health care, then deal with Monica and the dress.

HRC has very different, much more moderate politics. A real inability to connect with the working class that Warren has shown in spades. And mostly doesn’t have 20 years of pure hatred by half the country, including many independents to overcome.

There is a pete supporting woman i know who refuses to vote for warren because she reminds her of hrc and the old white female managers she's had in her life.

I"ve heard this from a number of mid 40's- mid 50's women who are dems - that they don't like Warren because she reminds them of a micromanaging boss that they've had in the past

This could be bigger than many imagine. The tendency of older women to treat their younger colleagues with smug sadism has been all too common.

Wow. Sexism and ageism all rolled into one tidy reason not to vote for a woman candidate. Nice try. But all older women bosses aren’t smug sadists. And when men display the exact same behavior, it’s called a tough management style, right?

Poor reading comprehension AND projection, all in the same reply! Nice work, PP! Trump has a good chance is thanks to people like you who think politics is about affirming yourself when it’s actually about gaining others’ trust. Maybe you and your ilk don’t actually care about others?

Who trusts Trump, exactly?

The voters who relish your and your allies apoplexy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the low-information voter, and there are many, Warren is Hillary 2.0. If she's the front-runner we'll have Trump for another 4 years... or even longer...

For anyone over 40– nope. And BTW, not all 60-70 year old smart white women are the same. Warren did not break into the national scene by saying she wasn’t going to just stay home and break cookies, then fail to overhaul health care, then deal with Monica and the dress.

HRC has very different, much more moderate politics. A real inability to connect with the working class that Warren has shown in spades. And mostly doesn’t have 20 years of pure hatred by half the country, including many independents to overcome.

There is a pete supporting woman i know who refuses to vote for warren because she reminds her of hrc and the old white female managers she's had in her life.

I"ve heard this from a number of mid 40's- mid 50's women who are dems - that they don't like Warren because she reminds them of a micromanaging boss that they've had in the past

Plus, and they probably won’t tell you this, but she reminds them of their aging selves. And they don’t like it

I didn't think of it that way

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not trust Warren with the pocohantas, switching from R to D, backing HRC and now pretending to be some progressive, flip flopping on Medicare for all and receiving money from non-individual donors while pretending to act as if she doesn’t. The deception and inconsistencies are almost endless. No integrity at all.

Your typical politician pretending to be a fighter against the establishment. She is a HRC 2.0 only slightly better and she will lose to Trump big time. She won’t get much support from progressives or black and Asian voters if she becomes the nominee less than Hillary.

I agree with you.

On the surface I liked her, so I started learning more about her proposals, her past books...and was very disappointed.

Her ethics are better than HRC's, but she's equally phony.

You Repos are so transparent.

Oh, pray tell, which books of hers that you have read turned you off? Which of her proposals that you yourself have read magically made your Repo heart not want to vote for the Democrats?

[Anonymous]

Great news for us conservatives. Means 4 more years of Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Great news for us conservatives. Means 4 more years of Trump

\\

He's a conservative? What about the deficit? Trade wars resulting in bailouts for farmers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great news for us conservatives. Means 4 more years of Trump

\\

He's a conservative? What about the deficit? Trade wars resulting in bailouts for farmers?

And unpaid for tax cuts that lead to spikes in deficit spending during a boom. Sounds very conservative.

[Anonymous]

Warren will remind everyone of a strict school marm and no white men in the mid-west will vote for her. Trump will win the rust belt again and be President for another 4 years. I'm not kidding. White men don't like her and she won't win enough of their votes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Warren will remind everyone of a strict school marm and no white men in the mid-west will vote for her. Trump will win the rust belt again and be President for another 4 years. I'm not kidding. White men don't like her and she won't win enough of their votes.

No white man anywhere, over 45 will vote for Warren.

Hillary was the smart, prissy girl who always beat them for every honor

Elizabeth is the try too hard who sat in the front row and bored people with her tedious plans for the newspaper

Two models of women lethal to men of a certain age.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Warren will remind everyone of a strict school marm and no white men in the mid-west will vote for her. Trump will win the rust belt again and be President for another 4 years. I'm not kidding. White men don't like her and she won't win enough of their votes.

No white man anywhere, over 45 will vote for Warren.

Hillary was the smart, prissy girl who always beat them for every honor

Elizabeth is the try too hard who sat in the front row and bored people with her tedious plans for the newspaper

Two models of women lethal to men of a certain age.

Right but let's face it, at this point there's a few states in the midwest that we care about and maybe a couple others here and there and that's it. The Presidential election is basically decided on five or six states.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Warren will remind everyone of a strict school marm and no white men in the mid-west will vote for her. Trump will win the rust belt again and be President for another 4 years. I'm not kidding. White men don't like her and she won't win enough of their votes.

No white man anywhere, over 45 will vote for Warren.

Hillary was the smart, prissy girl who always beat them for every honor

Elizabeth is the try too hard who sat in the front row and bored people with her tedious plans for the newspaper

Two models of women lethal to men of a certain age.

+1. And women of a certain age, as well.

[Anonymous]

Another article on how Warren is the favorite

https://www.newsweek.com/elizabeth-warren-joe-biden-favorite-odds-2020-democratic-primary-1454706

[Anonymous]

Also enough of this BS about white men not voting for her

I'm the op of the thread and I'm a white guy with a six figure salary.