Michelle Obama rents Hollywood Hills home, possibly scoping out L.A. move, report says

[Anonymous]

Wasn't Obama going to stop sea level rise by curbing Co2 emissions???

That is a 13,000 sq ft SECOND HOME with two swimming pools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Wasn't Obama going to stop sea level rise by curbing Co2 emissions???

That is a 13,000 sq ft SECOND HOME with two swimming pools.

Jealous much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Wasn't Obama going to stop sea level rise by curbing Co2 emissions???

That is a 13,000 sq ft SECOND HOME with two swimming pools.

Jealous much?

The climate can be warrior and income inequalities champ Obama.

Who needs two swimming pools?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Wasn't Obama going to stop sea level rise by curbing Co2 emissions???

That is a 13,000 sq ft SECOND HOME with two swimming pools.

Jealous much?

Im definitely jealous! And I'm guessing a lot of people supported Obama's and the Democrats in general income inequality rhetoric because they're jealous. Ironic much? Or how do you square the two?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Wasn't Obama going to stop sea level rise by curbing Co2 emissions???

That is a 13,000 sq ft SECOND HOME with two swimming pools.

Great point.

#BeyondDisgusting

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Wasn't Obama going to stop sea level rise by curbing Co2 emissions???

That is a 13,000 sq ft SECOND HOME with two swimming pools.

Jealous much?

The climate can be warrior and income inequalities champ Obama.

Who needs two swimming pools?

For him, for her.

Thank God their kids don't live with them any more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They have a production company in LA.

Why not Chicago?

Maybe b/c most production companies are in LA?

[Anonymous]

Is the 13,000 square home LEEd certified? Seems like a lot of energy consumption.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is the 13,000 square home LEEd certified? Seems like a lot of energy consumption.

And, how are they going to travel between both houses?

By sailboat I hope?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the 13,000 square home LEEd certified? Seems like a lot of energy consumption.

And, how are they going to travel between both houses?

By sailboat I hope?

Are you saying you want them on a slave ship? Why should they have to travel differently than anybody else?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the 13,000 square home LEEd certified? Seems like a lot of energy consumption.

And, how are they going to travel between both houses?

By sailboat I hope?

Are you saying you want them on a slave ship? Why should they have to travel differently than anybody else?

Because...climate change is about to destroy the planet in 12 years so we shouldn't fly all the time between house A and house B?

Are they going to skate from DC to LA?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the 13,000 square home LEEd certified? Seems like a lot of energy consumption.

And, how are they going to travel between both houses?

By sailboat I hope?

Are you saying you want them on a slave ship? Why should they have to travel differently than anybody else?

Because...climate change is about to destroy the planet in 12 years so we shouldn't fly all the time between house A and house B?

Are they going to skate from DC to LA?

Is that what you would do?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the 13,000 square home LEEd certified? Seems like a lot of energy consumption.

And, how are they going to travel between both houses?

By sailboat I hope?

Are you saying you want them on a slave ship? Why should they have to travel differently than anybody else?

Because...climate change is about to destroy the planet in 12 years so we shouldn't fly all the time between house A and house B?

Are they going to skate from DC to LA?

Is that what you would do?

Actually, even if we could afford two McMansions, we only have one small townhouse, to be able to be energy efficient. And we only fly/ drive as last resort, choosing public transportation as much as possible.

I'd expect a politician to claims to care about climate change to walk the talk, not to walk the opposite of the talk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the 13,000 square home LEEd certified? Seems like a lot of energy consumption.

And, how are they going to travel between both houses?

By sailboat I hope?

Are you saying you want them on a slave ship? Why should they have to travel differently than anybody else?

Because...climate change is about to destroy the planet in 12 years so we shouldn't fly all the time between house A and house B?

Are they going to skate from DC to LA?

Is that what you would do?

Actually, even if we could afford two McMansions, we only have one small townhouse, to be able to be energy efficient. And we only fly/ drive as last resort, choosing public transportation as much as possible.

I'd expect a politician to claims to care about climate change to walk the talk, not to walk the opposite of the talk.

And I'd expect people who claim to care about climate change not to vote for Trump, but judging by this thread, they still did. So, here we are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the 13,000 square home LEEd certified? Seems like a lot of energy consumption.

And, how are they going to travel between both houses?

By sailboat I hope?

Are you saying you want them on a slave ship? Why should they have to travel differently than anybody else?

Because...climate change is about to destroy the planet in 12 years so we shouldn't fly all the time between house A and house B?

Are they going to skate from DC to LA?

Is that what you would do?

Actually, even if we could afford two McMansions, we only have one small townhouse, to be able to be energy efficient. And we only fly/ drive as last resort, choosing public transportation as much as possible.

I'd expect a politician to claims to care about climate change to walk the talk, not to walk the opposite of the talk.

And I'd expect people who claim to care about climate change not to vote for Trump, but judging by this thread, they still did. So, here we are.

Who's talking Trump here?

Does he live in your head full-time?