Sorry, you are wrong. I do know what a truly high IQ looks like. My kids has one (tested by NIH). I also don't put a ton of stock in the whole IQ thing anyway (neither did the nih doc). You also have no idea about my kid's level of musical talent. You really just don't know what you're talking about. No one is trying to take away from talented or bright or gifted kids. Just recognize that a certain group puts a lot more educational investment in their kids and wants everyone else to think that means they are smarter. It ain't necessarily so. |
|
Go take a look at the thread on the feds investigating MCPS for discriminating against Asian-American students. There is no way MCPS is going to come out ahead in this investigation. They are in trouble.
The end result will either be getting rid of the easy to get into in bound seats for white DCC student and ending the cohort criteria which will fill the magnet with mostly asian and some white kids from OUTSIDE the DCC or just ending the MS magnet school all together and offering small regional or home school accelerated options. |
There are plenty of ways - assuming a non-political investigation. |
I'm going to bet all the efforts to impose test score only admissions evaluation on Magnets and Universities is going to backfire in the era of the current Supreme Court. |
I don't think that white affirmative action is going to find a friend on either a liberal or a conservative court. This is one of those cases that MCPS just can't win. |
You have a very particular view of the case, and by that, I mean biased. There is no indication that race was a factor. Again, it's like people just want everyone to think Asian kids are smarter, and these are somehow their spots. The spots don't belong to any race. And, this has nothing to do with TP kids who are at the school already and take no out-of-boundary spots. |
Well, then, it is a very good thing the new MCPS policy is race blind, then. I would say the same thing to do that I would say to the PP who believes the TPMS in-bounds spots should be reserved for Black and Latinx kids - to do it that way would be illegal. I don't know how else to explain it except that there is settled case law that using race in admissions for this type of program is illegal, but using geography is perfectly legitimate. |
The data does show that Asian American kids in MCPS score much higher than whites and other groups on every measurable point -SAT, PARCC, MAP. COGAT. Don't forget that curriculum 2.0 didn't just widen the gap between whites and AA/latinos, it widened the gap between Asian American and white kids. The feds would not be bothering to investigate a case that has no merit. Its more than fishy that Asian American admissions went down so much in the past two years while white admissions went up when the data on every other front suggests it should the reverse. Time will tell and I'm sure that the feds will look at all the data which MCPS can not be pleased about one bit. My money is on the outcome being that MCPS shuts down the magnet or at a minimum stops giving lower performing white kids in the DCC an easy way in. |
Whoa there is no case law that says it is legal to use geography as a proxy for race in admissions. In fact, the voter suppression cases are about exactly that principle. What is legal is establishing additional weighting for disadvantaged students. |
It is the natural conclusion to a lifetimes “Thad needs enrichment so get him out of those classes with brown errr I mean avg test takers”. They angle so vigorously because the thought of being stuck with the local kids terrifies them. The 25 seats is a hope that classroom isolation can last all the way through high school. That is enough for many to move that far east for the discount |
But this makes the problem worse. By pulling out the slightly above average kids and throwing them into the in boundary magnet spots, the general ed classes at TPMS do become filled with kids that can only work at an average pace. This makes the parents even more desperate to get into the magnet because they don't want their kid left behind. |
If they're zoned to a school with a strong peer cohort they don't need the magnet. The enriched classes are supposedly wonderful. Your kids should check them out. |
It's a set aside left over from the era of parent driven entrance into the Magnets. When only a relatively few parents sought the programs, the set aside was kind of a fuzzy thing. Now that all the stats are public and thousands are "considered", it's probably unsustainable - especially if as suggested on this thread the 25 are not at all representative of the overall makeup of TPMS. When no one really knew, that worked fine. Now? |
This is completely untrue. First, kids are tiered outside the magnet (honors / non-honors), so the school bifurcates there. Magnet kids only take three classes that are different from the general Population (math, comp sci, science) for everything else the classes are all mixed with the non magnet honors kids. For non-magnet kids needing more challenge, there is a highly accelerated math program with dedicated teachers, that isn’t quite the track of magnet kids, but it is close and sets non-magnet kids up fine for HS magnet or accelerated HS math. For what it is worth, the in-bound kids aren’t slightly above average, they fit right in, otherwise there really is no benefit to them to struggle (and I don’t know anyone who does). |
You don't say. |