| It is shocking how many people were apparently walking around thinking we lived in a meritocracy. LOL |
I hear ya. Although I was pretty old (35?) before I realized that intellect and hard work and determination and choosing a “good” field were not enough to catch up even remotely. You also need luck/timing and that’s harder to come by. |
Where did pp say anything about foregoing those things? Personally, I don't think having privileges necessarily equates to being spoiled or babied it does seem like the privileged are lately making a real effort in that direction. And your Aspen comment comes off not as a snob, but as a snot. |
|
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of light, it was the season of darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair.
|
Easy. Charles Dickens.
|
|
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/15/opinion/college-admissions-fraud.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share
good article. and the responses are a good read as well. |
Not all European countries. Even affluent countries like Austria do not provide the services we do in the States. The Scandinavian countries come close but there is a two tier system between the natives and recently arrived emigres. Look what oil rich Norway has done to the Somalis |
Given the prior post, I'm pretty sure that's how it was intended. |
Do you think those emojis reinforce your point, or make you appear a bit dim? |
The meritocracy is a philosophical claim that some people deserve power and riches whereas others deserve nothing. This claim is founded upon two tenets: 1) some forms of work are worth vast amounts of money because such work is important, whereas other kinds of work are not worth anything and thus the people doing such work get paid nothing (housework, for example) and 2) the value of the person is measured in what kind of work they do and how much they perform. People have no intrinsic value. They have no right to exist without meeting the approval of the work they do or don't do. All this is false, fallacious reasoning. The value of various kinds of work is determined by rich people who tell us that working in a bank is worth much money, whereas working to raise children is completely worthless -- not worth a single dime. We can observe the meritocracy as a form of class war. |
Raising children is incredibly valuable. It just doesn’t pay the bills and never will. People need to live in reality. |
I have all of this and more too. You know what the difference is? I feel pride in myself knowing I (and DH) provide those things for our family. Rich kids don’t get that opportunity it seems, which is kind of sad in a way. I’ll have to think about that when my kids are getting ready to leave the nest. You don’t know what you’re capable of because you’ve ever needed to know. No one has forced you to find out. |
You should be ashamed that you’re an adult who can’t live on what they earn. You rely on handouts.. you just know who is handing out. |
|
"And, actually, please also realize: we are going to start looking down on you a little bit, because we thought you were doing it all on your own, like we are, and yet we realize you are actually just a little bit soft, weaker than we thought. Spoiled. Babied. Helped."
NP here. I am not going to lie. I definitely feel this way when I realize how much parental and IL help some adults - adults with their own families - have. It seems kind of pathetic to me that they can't provide for their own family. |
This is how I feel too. When is one really a grown-up, then, in this type of arrangement? |