Top DOJ official demoted - contacts with Trump dossier firm

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Flynn pled guilty to a leaser charge already. Why would he plead anything if he was innocent?

Really, you all are barking up the wrong tree on all of this and are falling hook, line and sinker for one of the most dastardly propoganda and anti-American campaigns ever.

Let's see how you react if the mighty government threatens to jail your son.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And when Mueller fires the agent in question on the day he found out about it, then what still needs to be cleaned up? Seems to me there would be an issue if Mueller hadn't removed the agent from the case. He did, so why is this still an issue?

1. Who else besides Flynn did the agent interview? How biased were his interviews?
2. Did the FBI pay for the dossier along with the Clinton campaign? If so, did this agent have anything to do with this?
3. Did this agent use the dossier to get FISA warrants to get information on Americans who worked for the Trump campaign?

While it is okay to have political opinions, it appears that this agent let those opinions influence him. This is a huge problem and taints the whole thing--in fact, was this dossier the "insurance" plan? If so, then Mueller needs to shut down shop as the whole Russian collusion issue is a sham investigation.

Further, how much did this agent have to do with HRC getting off the hook? It appears to be quite a bit--but this is not part of Mueller's investigation from what I can tell.

Other issues with the investigation are the lawyer who went to Hillary's Election night party. That indicates more involvement with politics than "opinions". Especially, since he wrote an "Ata girl" to Sally Yates.
Another lawyer on Mueller's team worked for the Clinton Foundation. That appears to be a conflict of interest here that surpasses political preference.

I don't think Ohr was working for Mueller, but he did have a responsible DOJ job. His wife worked for FUSION. Did this have influence from DOJ?

This is a can of worms.

Don't get too distracted. Remember, the FBI are the good guys. The FBI are not the bad guys.

PP didn’t say anything about the FBI being the bad guys. When you have a rogue agent, you need to take action. Even great agencies have people who need to be held accountable for poor decisions.

PP thinks that Mueller and every single person on his team are rogue agents. And probably Rosenstein, McCabe, and every person at the FBI or DOJ that PP knows by name and every person that PP does not know by name, too.

PP did not say that. There are others who have questionable connections. You would think with all the attorneys there are in DC, Mueller could have found others who did not have direct connections to Hillary, her foundation, and her campaign.
Weissman (DOJ) attended what was supposed to be Hillary’s victory party. He was the same person who emailed Sally Yates praising her. If you don’t sense a bit of bias here, you’re out of touch.

The others pp referenced:

Aaron Zebley, a former partner at WilmerHale and a former chief of staff to Mueller when he served as FBI director, represented Justin Cooper, a key figure in the Clinton email controversy.

Cooper is the longtime Bill Clinton aide responsible for helping set up the now-infamous private email server. Cooper later admitted to “two instances where he destroyed [Hillary] Clinton’s old mobile devices by breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer.”

Jeannie Rhee, another former partner at WilmerHale, represented ex-Obama National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes, the Clinton Foundation in a 2015 racketeering case, and Hillary Clinton herself in a lawsuit seeking access to her private emails.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/08/more-clinton-ties-on-mueller-team-one-deputy-attended-clinton-party-another-repd-top-aide.html

Thanks for this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Flynn pled guilty to a leaser charge already. Why would he plead anything if he was innocent?

Really, you all are barking up the wrong tree on all of this and are falling hook, line and sinker for one of the most dastardly propoganda and anti-American campaigns ever.

Let's see how you react if the mighty government threatens to jail your son.

Flynn is clearly guilty of treason. If he were my son, I'd want him in prison.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And when Mueller fires the agent in question on the day he found out about it, then what still needs to be cleaned up? Seems to me there would be an issue if Mueller hadn't removed the agent from the case. He did, so why is this still an issue?

1. Who else besides Flynn did the agent interview? How biased were his interviews?
2. Did the FBI pay for the dossier along with the Clinton campaign? If so, did this agent have anything to do with this?
3. Did this agent use the dossier to get FISA warrants to get information on Americans who worked for the Trump campaign?

While it is okay to have political opinions, it appears that this agent let those opinions influence him. This is a huge problem and taints the whole thing--in fact, was this dossier the "insurance" plan? If so, then Mueller needs to shut down shop as the whole Russian collusion issue is a sham investigation.

Further, how much did this agent have to do with HRC getting off the hook? It appears to be quite a bit--but this is not part of Mueller's investigation from what I can tell.

Other issues with the investigation are the lawyer who went to Hillary's Election night party. That indicates more involvement with politics than "opinions". Especially, since he wrote an "Ata girl" to Sally Yates.
Another lawyer on Mueller's team worked for the Clinton Foundation. That appears to be a conflict of interest here that surpasses political preference.

I don't think Ohr was working for Mueller, but he did have a responsible DOJ job. His wife worked for FUSION. Did this have influence from DOJ?

This is a can of worms.

Don't get too distracted. Remember, the FBI are the good guys. The FBI are not the bad guys.

PP didn’t say anything about the FBI being the bad guys. When you have a rogue agent, you need to take action. Even great agencies have people who need to be held accountable for poor decisions.

I agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Flynn pled guilty to a leaser charge already. Why would he plead anything if he was innocent?

Really, you all are barking up the wrong tree on all of this and are falling hook, line and sinker for one of the most dastardly propoganda and anti-American campaigns ever.

Let's see how you react if the mighty government threatens to jail your son.

Flynn is clearly guilty of treason. If he were my son, I'd want him in prison.

The government threatened Flynn to charge his son. Flynn would probably fight this if his son had not been dragged into this.

Flynn was charged with a process crime, not treason.

[Anonymous]

Saying Flynn is guilty of treason is like saying Lisa page is a beauty queen. He ain’t and she isn’t. #gollumwithaJD

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not surprising. The FBI had the Steele dossier, it makes sense that someone (probably more than one someone) at Justice also knew about it.

What reason would a DOJ attorney have for meeting with Steele and with Fusion GPS?

And 2) Why would Bruce Ohr keep these meetings secret from his FBI boss? -DP

Which boss? You mean Comey, Boente, Rosenstein, or Sessions? Isn't Sessions recused?

Rosenstein.

Um, crickets.

I'm hearing that subpoenas are on the way to everyone next week from Comey to Ohr and everyone in between. Source on this is Desantis and Jordan.

If anyone takes the fifth, pull out the blow torches. We'll get to the bottom of everything real quick. No more games.

[Anonymous]

Oh, and put EVERYONE of them under oath.

No more sideline questioning that isn't under oath, like Mills and Clinton.

That crap has to stop, pronto.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And when Mueller fires the agent in question on the day he found out about it, then what still needs to be cleaned up? Seems to me there would be an issue if Mueller hadn't removed the agent from the case. He did, so why is this still an issue?

1. Who else besides Flynn did the agent interview? How biased were his interviews?
2. Did the FBI pay for the dossier along with the Clinton campaign? If so, did this agent have anything to do with this?
3. Did this agent use the dossier to get FISA warrants to get information on Americans who worked for the Trump campaign?

While it is okay to have political opinions, it appears that this agent let those opinions influence him. This is a huge problem and taints the whole thing--in fact, was this dossier the "insurance" plan? If so, then Mueller needs to shut down shop as the whole Russian collusion issue is a sham investigation.

Further, how much did this agent have to do with HRC getting off the hook? It appears to be quite a bit--but this is not part of Mueller's investigation from what I can tell.

Other issues with the investigation are the lawyer who went to Hillary's Election night party. That indicates more involvement with politics than "opinions". Especially, since he wrote an "Ata girl" to Sally Yates.
Another lawyer on Mueller's team worked for the Clinton Foundation. That appears to be a conflict of interest here that surpasses political preference.

I don't think Ohr was working for Mueller, but he did have a responsible DOJ job. His wife worked for FUSION. Did this have influence from DOJ?

This is a can of worms.

Don't get too distracted. Remember, the FBI are the good guys. The FBI are not the bad guys.

PP didn’t say anything about the FBI being the bad guys. When you have a rogue agent, you need to take action. Even great agencies have people who need to be held accountable for poor decisions.

I agree.

Sending private messages in which you recognize that Trump is a dangerous buffoon doesn’t make you a rogue agent. It proves you’re paying attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Flynn pled guilty to a leaser charge already. Why would he plead anything if he was innocent?

Really, you all are barking up the wrong tree on all of this and are falling hook, line and sinker for one of the most dastardly propoganda and anti-American campaigns ever.

Let's see how you react if the mighty government threatens to jail your son.

After Hillary having an email server with classified information on it attached to the internet, I doubt anyone gets jailed for most anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And when Mueller fires the agent in question on the day he found out about it, then what still needs to be cleaned up? Seems to me there would be an issue if Mueller hadn't removed the agent from the case. He did, so why is this still an issue?

1. Who else besides Flynn did the agent interview? How biased were his interviews?
2. Did the FBI pay for the dossier along with the Clinton campaign? If so, did this agent have anything to do with this?
3. Did this agent use the dossier to get FISA warrants to get information on Americans who worked for the Trump campaign?

While it is okay to have political opinions, it appears that this agent let those opinions influence him. This is a huge problem and taints the whole thing--in fact, was this dossier the "insurance" plan? If so, then Mueller needs to shut down shop as the whole Russian collusion issue is a sham investigation.

Further, how much did this agent have to do with HRC getting off the hook? It appears to be quite a bit--but this is not part of Mueller's investigation from what I can tell.

Other issues with the investigation are the lawyer who went to Hillary's Election night party. That indicates more involvement with politics than "opinions". Especially, since he wrote an "Ata girl" to Sally Yates.
Another lawyer on Mueller's team worked for the Clinton Foundation. That appears to be a conflict of interest here that surpasses political preference.

I don't think Ohr was working for Mueller, but he did have a responsible DOJ job. His wife worked for FUSION. Did this have influence from DOJ?

This is a can of worms.

Don't get too distracted. Remember, the FBI are the good guys. The FBI are not the bad guys.

PP didn’t say anything about the FBI being the bad guys. When you have a rogue agent, you need to take action. Even great agencies have people who need to be held accountable for poor decisions.

PP thinks that Mueller and every single person on his team are rogue agents. And probably Rosenstein, McCabe, and every person at the FBI or DOJ that PP knows by name and every person that PP does not know by name, too.

PP did not say that. There are others who have questionable connections. You would think with all the attorneys there are in DC, Mueller could have found others who did not have direct connections to Hillary, her foundation, and her campaign.
Weissman (DOJ) attended what was supposed to be Hillary’s victory party. He was the same person who emailed Sally Yates praising her. If you don’t sense a bit of bias here, you’re out of touch.

The others pp referenced:

Aaron Zebley, a former partner at WilmerHale and a former chief of staff to Mueller when he served as FBI director, represented Justin Cooper, a key figure in the Clinton email controversy.

Cooper is the longtime Bill Clinton aide responsible for helping set up the now-infamous private email server. Cooper later admitted to “two instances where he destroyed [Hillary] Clinton’s old mobile devices by breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer.”

Jeannie Rhee, another former partner at WilmerHale, represented ex-Obama National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes, the Clinton Foundation in a 2015 racketeering case, and Hillary Clinton herself in a lawsuit seeking access to her private emails.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/08/more-clinton-ties-on-mueller-team-one-deputy-attended-clinton-party-another-repd-top-aide.html

I will not accept anything that's reported by Fox as evidence of anything. Fox is completely biased, a mouthpiece for the Trump administration. Choose a non-biased source and get back to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Flynn pled guilty to a leaser charge already. Why would he plead anything if he was innocent?

Really, you all are barking up the wrong tree on all of this and are falling hook, line and sinker for one of the most dastardly propoganda and anti-American campaigns ever.

Let's see how you react if the mighty government threatens to jail your son.

Well, if you son is a criminal, let's see.... how would YOU react??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And when Mueller fires the agent in question on the day he found out about it, then what still needs to be cleaned up? Seems to me there would be an issue if Mueller hadn't removed the agent from the case. He did, so why is this still an issue?

1. Who else besides Flynn did the agent interview? How biased were his interviews?
2. Did the FBI pay for the dossier along with the Clinton campaign? If so, did this agent have anything to do with this?
3. Did this agent use the dossier to get FISA warrants to get information on Americans who worked for the Trump campaign?

While it is okay to have political opinions, it appears that this agent let those opinions influence him. This is a huge problem and taints the whole thing--in fact, was this dossier the "insurance" plan? If so, then Mueller needs to shut down shop as the whole Russian collusion issue is a sham investigation.

Further, how much did this agent have to do with HRC getting off the hook? It appears to be quite a bit--but this is not part of Mueller's investigation from what I can tell.

Other issues with the investigation are the lawyer who went to Hillary's Election night party. That indicates more involvement with politics than "opinions". Especially, since he wrote an "Ata girl" to Sally Yates.
Another lawyer on Mueller's team worked for the Clinton Foundation. That appears to be a conflict of interest here that surpasses political preference.

I don't think Ohr was working for Mueller, but he did have a responsible DOJ job. His wife worked for FUSION. Did this have influence from DOJ?

This is a can of worms.

Don't get too distracted. Remember, the FBI are the good guys. The FBI are not the bad guys.

PP didn’t say anything about the FBI being the bad guys. When you have a rogue agent, you need to take action. Even great agencies have people who need to be held accountable for poor decisions.

I agree.

This "rogue agent" language must have come straight from Moscow. I've seen it all over. Gawd. You could not be more obvious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And when Mueller fires the agent in question on the day he found out about it, then what still needs to be cleaned up? Seems to me there would be an issue if Mueller hadn't removed the agent from the case. He did, so why is this still an issue?

1. Who else besides Flynn did the agent interview? How biased were his interviews?
2. Did the FBI pay for the dossier along with the Clinton campaign? If so, did this agent have anything to do with this?
3. Did this agent use the dossier to get FISA warrants to get information on Americans who worked for the Trump campaign?

While it is okay to have political opinions, it appears that this agent let those opinions influence him. This is a huge problem and taints the whole thing--in fact, was this dossier the "insurance" plan? If so, then Mueller needs to shut down shop as the whole Russian collusion issue is a sham investigation.

Further, how much did this agent have to do with HRC getting off the hook? It appears to be quite a bit--but this is not part of Mueller's investigation from what I can tell.

Other issues with the investigation are the lawyer who went to Hillary's Election night party. That indicates more involvement with politics than "opinions". Especially, since he wrote an "Ata girl" to Sally Yates.
Another lawyer on Mueller's team worked for the Clinton Foundation. That appears to be a conflict of interest here that surpasses political preference.

I don't think Ohr was working for Mueller, but he did have a responsible DOJ job. His wife worked for FUSION. Did this have influence from DOJ?

This is a can of worms.

Don't get too distracted. Remember, the FBI are the good guys. The FBI are not the bad guys.

PP didn’t say anything about the FBI being the bad guys. When you have a rogue agent, you need to take action. Even great agencies have people who need to be held accountable for poor decisions.

PP thinks that Mueller and every single person on his team are rogue agents. And probably Rosenstein, McCabe, and every person at the FBI or DOJ that PP knows by name and every person that PP does not know by name, too.

PP did not say that. There are others who have questionable connections. You would think with all the attorneys there are in DC, Mueller could have found others who did not have direct connections to Hillary, her foundation, and her campaign.
Weissman (DOJ) attended what was supposed to be Hillary’s victory party. He was the same person who emailed Sally Yates praising her. If you don’t sense a bit of bias here, you’re out of touch.

The others pp referenced:

Aaron Zebley, a former partner at WilmerHale and a former chief of staff to Mueller when he served as FBI director, represented Justin Cooper, a key figure in the Clinton email controversy.

Cooper is the longtime Bill Clinton aide responsible for helping set up the now-infamous private email server. Cooper later admitted to “two instances where he destroyed [Hillary] Clinton’s old mobile devices by breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer.”

Jeannie Rhee, another former partner at WilmerHale, represented ex-Obama National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes, the Clinton Foundation in a 2015 racketeering case, and Hillary Clinton herself in a lawsuit seeking access to her private emails.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/08/more-clinton-ties-on-mueller-team-one-deputy-attended-clinton-party-another-repd-top-aide.html

I will not accept anything that's reported by Fox as evidence of anything. Fox is completely biased, a mouthpiece for the Trump administration. Choose a non-biased source and get back to me.

Um, Clinton News Network?

[Anonymous]

Time to shut down the investigation altogether.


July 10, 2015 — FBI opens the Clinton email investigation in response to a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General.

Feb. 27, 2016 — Strzok interviews Jake Sullivan, a former Clinton State Department aide and adviser to her campaign.

March 2 — Asked by Page who he planned to vote for, Strzok replied: “I suppose Hillary.”

March 4 — Strzok writes to Page of Trump: “Omg he’s an idiot.” He says that a Trump victory in the GOP primaries will be “good for Hillary.” (RELATED: FBI Agent Praised Hillary While He Was Leading Investigation Into Her Emails)

“God Hillary should win. 100,000,000-0,” Strzok writes.

April — The law firm for the Clinton campaign and DNC hires opposition research firm Fusion GPS to investigate Trump. Fusion would go on to hire Christopher Steele, the former British spy who authored the infamous dossier.

April 5 — Strzok interviews Clinton aide Huma Abedin.

April 9 — Strzok interviews Clinton aide Cheryl Mills.

May 16 — A draft of a statement that then-FBI Director James Comey was preparing to release at the conclusion of the Clinton email probe was circulated among top FBI officials, including Strzok. “Please send me any comments on this statement,” wrote FBI chief of staff James Rybicki.

Strzok has since been identified as the agent who suggested that Comey remove the legally-loaded term “grossly negligent” to describe Clinton’s email use and replace it with the term “extremely careless.”

May 24 — Strzok interviews Clinton aide Heather Samuelson.

June 12 — Strzok writes: “They fully deserve to go, and demonstrate the absolute bigoted nonsense of Trump.”

June 17 — “Now we’re talking about Clinton, and how a lot of people are holding their breath, hoping,” he tells Page, appearing to reference a meeting that is not described. (RELATED: Top Clinton Aides Went Unpunished For Making Misleading Statements In FBI Interviews)

June 20 — Steele writes the first of 17 memos that make up the dossier. He alleges that the Kremlin has recruited Donald Trump as an asset and that Russian operatives had been feeding the Trump campaign negative information about Clinton.

June 27 — Then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch meets in secret with former President Bill Clinton. The meeting forces Lynch to step away from the Clinton probe.

July 2 — Strzok and Justice Department lawyer David Laufman interview Hillary Clinton.

July 5 — Comey announces that he would not refer charges against Clinton to federal prosecutors.

July 5 — Steele meets with an FBI contact to provide a briefing of the unverified rumors he had picked up from Russian sources.

July 19 — Steele writes the second memo of the dossier. It alleges that Trump campaign adviser Carter Page and campaign chairman Paul Manafort were handling the collusion effort with the Kremlin. Both have since vehemently denied the allegation.


http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/14/strzoks-texts-and-the-clinton-trump-investigations-a-definitive-timeline/?utm_source=site-share