Mueller now investigating the Podesta group

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn't it an option for someone to want EVERYONE to go down regardless of party affiliation?

Why isn't it an option for someone to want EVERYONE to go down regardless of political ideology?

Why isn't it an option for the American people to see justice served across the board - liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans. Why can't Americans want everyone and anyone who has contributed to the destabilization of our democracy to get locked up?

Why do American's have to "choose a side" and only want the folks on the other side of the aisle to get punished? How does that clean up the shitshow that is our government at present?

Y'all need to wake the F up and stop clinging to party affiliations for dear life. If you truly care about this country and want things to be better you'll want everyone and anyone who is crooked to get locked up regardless of whether they're on the left or the right.

+1

I voted for Trump but I couldn’t care less if his associates go to jail for crimes they committed. What I don’t understand is the fierce defense the liberals in this forum have for the democrats, Obama, Susan Rice, Fusion GPS, HRC... It makes you wonder a lot of the liberals here have vested interests in democratic politics, or they blindly follow the media and can’t think for themselves.

Because those are fake news. When all of those people mentioned are revealed to have conspired with a hostile foreign power, I will be glad to see them do the perp walk too. Until then, we rely on facts.

Let me ask you this do you work in democratic politics? Without an actual investigation, how do you know they are fake news?

[Anonymous]

Why are the republicans who control the entire federal government not investigating Clinton? Is this the fault of democrats?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn't it an option for someone to want EVERYONE to go down regardless of party affiliation?

Why isn't it an option for someone to want EVERYONE to go down regardless of political ideology?

Why isn't it an option for the American people to see justice served across the board - liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans. Why can't Americans want everyone and anyone who has contributed to the destabilization of our democracy to get locked up?

Why do American's have to "choose a side" and only want the folks on the other side of the aisle to get punished? How does that clean up the shitshow that is our government at present?

Y'all need to wake the F up and stop clinging to party affiliations for dear life. If you truly care about this country and want things to be better you'll want everyone and anyone who is crooked to get locked up regardless of whether they're on the left or the right.

+1

I voted for Trump but I couldn’t care less if his associates go to jail for crimes they committed. What I don’t understand is the fierce defense the liberals in this forum have for the democrats, Obama, Susan Rice, Fusion GPS, HRC... It makes you wonder a lot of the liberals here have vested interests in democratic politics, or they blindly follow the media and can’t think for themselves.

Because those are fake news. When all of those people mentioned are revealed to have conspired with a hostile foreign power, I will be glad to see them do the perp walk too. Until then, we rely on facts.

Let me ask you this do you work in democratic politics? Without an actual investigation, how do you know they are fake news?

Because I haven't heard any credible accusations besides the usual Fox News hysteria.

Remember Benghazi? That was one hell of an investigation. Y'all wasted a lot of credibility on that one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't Mueller address the Podesta Group criminal activities while he was Director of the FBI under President Obama?

You keep posting this in all the threads. Maybe Trump's idiocy exposed everyone just now.

Regardless, lock them all up!

Actually, I posted this in another thread. This is not me so there are two of us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't Mueller address the Podesta Group criminal activities while he was Director of the FBI under President Obama?

You keep posting this in all the threads. Maybe Trump's idiocy exposed everyone just now.

Regardless, lock them all up!

Actually, I posted this in another thread. This is not me so there are two of us.

Interesting how your talking points are identical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't Mueller address the Podesta Group criminal activities while he was Director of the FBI under President Obama?

LOL, the desperation.

Why doesn't law enforcement address all crimes right when they begin?

Idiot

Why wait until statue of limitations runs out tho?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't Mueller address the Podesta Group criminal activities while he was Director of the FBI under President Obama?

LOL, the desperation.

Why doesn't law enforcement address all crimes right when they begin?

Idiot

Why wait until statue of limitations runs out tho?

Because maybe they weren't aware of the crimes until then? Jesus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are the republicans who control the entire federal government not investigating Clinton? Is this the fault of democrats?

Democrats are united in congress, while republicans are fractured. For whatever reason, AG Sessions is very afraid to take on the democrats in power. He cowardly recused himself immediately after getting confirmed. He is very weak and ineffective. He does have courage to take on Mexicans though, many of them are law-abiding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are the republicans who control the entire federal government not investigating Clinton? Is this the fault of democrats?

Democrats are united in congress, while republicans are fractured. For whatever reason, AG Sessions is very afraid to take on the democrats in power. He cowardly recused himself immediately after getting confirmed. He is very weak and ineffective. He does have courage to take on Mexicans though, many of them are law-abiding.

He properly recused himself. There are rules about things, you know. Lawyers are supposed to follow them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't Mueller address the Podesta Group criminal activities while he was Director of the FBI under President Obama?

LOL, the desperation.

Why doesn't law enforcement address all crimes right when they begin?

Idiot

Why wait until statue of limitations runs out tho?

Because maybe they weren't aware of the crimes until then? Jesus.

Sure. You know... friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't Mueller address the Podesta Group criminal activities while he was Director of the FBI under President Obama?

LOL, the desperation.

Why doesn't law enforcement address all crimes right when they begin?

Idiot

Why wait until statue of limitations runs out tho?

Because maybe they weren't aware of the crimes until then? Jesus.

Sure. You know... friends.

Yes. I think the FBI needs to hear from you, PP. You seem to know a lot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are the republicans who control the entire federal government not investigating Clinton? Is this the fault of democrats?

Democrats are united in congress, while republicans are fractured. For whatever reason, AG Sessions is very afraid to take on the democrats in power. He cowardly recused himself immediately after getting confirmed. He is very weak and ineffective. He does have courage to take on Mexicans though, many of them are law-abiding.

That is a funny statement.

[Anonymous]

The poly thickened.

Companies A and B are Podesta Group and Mercury. Sources leaked this to NBC

http://archive.is/SasEd

If Manafort is the bait to catch the big fish, well hopefully see Clinton in shackles soon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The poly thickened.

Companies A and B are Podesta Group and Mercury. Sources leaked this to NBC

http://archive.is/SasEd

If Manafort is the bait to catch the big fish, well hopefully see Clinton in shackles soon.

Never mind that pesky Papadopolous. That was just a red herring, amirite? Get it, red herring?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The poly thickened.

Companies A and B are Podesta Group and Mercury. Sources leaked this to NBC

http://archive.is/SasEd

If Manafort is the bait to catch the big fish, well hopefully see Clinton in shackles soon.

Ha ha. You funny.