I totally agree that OP is conflating middle class with being able to aggressively save for retirement and still afford nice luxuries. But there is also truth to 275k not going as far as it used to because inflation. However, I think OP should really be saying that her income doesn’t afford the full UMC lifestyle (although without kids I don’t see how she is stretched). For a family of 4 (2 parents, 2 kids) I could see how 275k feels like the lower end of UMC and you would have to make budget cuts that families making closer to 350-400k don’t necessarily have to make. My family has a 300k HHI and we still have to save up for big purchases, budget out our travel, pick and choose where to prioritize spending. This income in the DC area does not afford all the things my childhood self would have envisioned it could. But I could never ever ever claim we are poor. My children have never gone hungry, slept in a home we couldn’t afford to heat, been left alone because I couldn’t afford childcare to go to work, etc. OP’s definitions of poor and MC need adjustment. |
? there are a fair number of people who grew up lower income and are now MC or UMC, myself included. And I was not a LA major. |
Ha! I’m from in er city Detroit and I’ve had to support a parent and a grandparent, so stop you sad sack story. No money from in-laws either. OP is special. |
OP is truly offensive. Despicable, really. They truly don’t know what it is like to be poor. They burn through a pile of money and cry poor. They are the worst kind of people. |
I think people forget that aggressively saving for retirement is luxurious. Saving just 20K a year from age 30 to 65 results in a balance of $2,824,500 in today's dollars, which allows you to withdraw 9.4K/month using the 4% rule. If you're a couple, you would have double that (so 200K/year of safe retirement spending). How many posters on DCUM do we see talking about how they have 5.5M+ in retirement funds? Not that many. I agree that 275K is a good MC/UMC income for DINKs, but like all MC/UMC families, you can get a few luxuries but not all luxuries. I think what's happening is that, when we envision the UMC, we think of people who live in nice homes in (1) nice houses in (2) nice neighborhoods with (3) nice cars and at least (4) one international vacation a year. They also have (5) nice clothes, (6) healthy retirement savings, etc. If you look at UMC people as a whole, they probably do in fact have all of these things. However, if you look at each individual person, they probably have to prioritize 4 out of 6 of these items. |
LOL. People have all kinds of visions that don’t equate to reality. The people who are showy with their money usually aren’t as financially stable. Been that way forever. OP is just being ugly. |
Yes, but how much do you make per hour? Sounds like you’re nothing but a freeloading spend-a-lot. |
Exactly!! Lived in SV for a few years during the late 90s/early 2000s tech boom. So many people driving 60K vehicles (that would be 90K+ now), remodeling their homes, many fancy vacations each year, dining out all the time, etc. Many not fully saving (some not at all) for retirement because "my stock options are worth millions/or will be". So basically spending all their income, not saving at all because the stock options were there. Well then the market crashed, the options were worthless (or close to it). These people then had a luxury lifestyle they couldn't support and no retirement or other savings. Some had even purchased their stock options (so they'd be LT cap gains when they would be able to exercise them). Well guess what, you owe taxes on them, even if they are worthless. I know 5+ people who owed 250K-500K+ in taxes on now worthless options. Most of them had mortgages on homes that were now worth much less than they'd paid for them, so they couldn't sell without paying money to pay off the mortgage. These were "intelligent people"/highly educated, who just figured they were entitled to spend money they didn't yet have, and failed to save for the future. At least one, who owed almost 800K in taxes and overpaid by 400K+ for a new home because they no longer liked their old home, took over a decade to "bounce back" and get on their feet. These were not unique stories, many in SV were living like this. |
jealous much? I was making $150K 25+ years ago when we made the joint decision for me to become a SAHP, to kids where the other parent was traveling 2+ weeks per month typically and would get home at 8pm most nights. There is more to contribute to a family than just a paycheck. It works for us, my spouse is quite happy with the arrangement. In reality, why are you bothered by how we spend our money? We have plenty of it. |
Seriously - I'm confused how buying a car would put a strain on their finances. But OP hasn't shared their budget so how would we know. |
+1 we've skimped on the nice clothes, and expensive cars, only do international vacations every other or third year. We do everything else above. No kids means you aren't shelling out $3K+ every month on daycare and/or college savings, and that's excluding activities, clothes, the cost of their phone lines and food, medical bills (my kids ended up in the ER 3x, including one major surgery), and adding them to your car insurance, etc.. If people manage to do all that with $275K, then OP can manage to live a pretty good lifestyle as DINKS with that amount. But, again, OP should post their expenses to prove us wrong. |
Not bothered. Just embarrassed for you. I have countless acquaintances that have the option to become a SAHP. The only ones that actually choose this path, however, are those that lack the endurance and self-confidence to succeed as contributing professionals. The acquaintances I consider friends are able to rise above adversity and push through the glass ceiling, where others – much like yourself – repeatedly fail. |
get over yourself - not everyone values the same things in life. (not PP). |
Agreed. Some people – like me – value investing in hard work, contributing to society, promoting education, and empowering overall health and happiness to all. Others – such as yourself, perhaps – value cutting corners, bending the rules, stealing from children, and raping society’s unbridled innocence. To each his own. |
Yep |