Tucker in Russia

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s cool how Trump has flipped everything. Now the anti war edgy journalism is coming from traditional American side. The leftists are now the warmongering stodgy and easily offended side.

This is supposed to be Tucker now because of this interview? Ahahahahahahahahahahaha!

If you follow the progression of things, Tucker has overtly advanced a neo-isolationist perspective on Russia’s attack on Ukraine the entire time. He’s doing that because he knows it’s popular to do that on the right. Evangelicals like Russia (anti-gay, “traditional values” etc) and Trump felates Putin at every turn. So basically this interview was more right wing pandering. I know you don’t get it. Or heck maybe you’re some paid shill in a room somewhere writing sympathetic sht. This is the internet. Who knows.

I don't get that at all. Putin is sticking to his neo-Nazi story as one of his justifications for invading the Ukraine. By that same logic, he could invade the US. He won't, but his logic still doesn't hold water, so there's clearly some other reason for his invasion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen the clip today where he talks about “why” he went over there and how it’s “his amendment amendment right as a journalist”? He’s actually defined as an entertainer.

He is basically a mouthpiece for Russia. He isn’t looking to “tell the truth”. American conservatives will eat it up. The interview will increase the polarization in our country. The sad part is I realize half the country is extremely conservative and probably look to Russia as a source of hope. It’s a place where gays are vilified because it’s a place of “traditional values”. Where a strongman calls the shots. It’s a Christian nationalists dream.

This whole interview is traitorous and bullsht. All it will do is further erode support for additional assistance to Ukraine and show our WW2 allies we have issues.

I haven't read the responses to this thread yet, but you do realize that Russia was our WWII ally? Ands some (many?) historians views the battle of Leningrad (where 2 million Russians died) is what defeated Hitler.

I think a Russian troll farm is writing on this forum. Sad.

Nope. I live in MA in a lovely green leafy suburb of Boston. There's nothing wrong with understanding history and context and stepping out of one's comfort zone in trying to understand other people's perspectives. The world is not made up of simplistic stories where there is one "right" and one "wrong" side. I've never watched a Tucker Carlson interview before but I'm watching his one with Putin now and I am struck by the amount of time he is allowing Putin to provide his perspective of historic context.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen the clip today where he talks about “why” he went over there and how it’s “his amendment amendment right as a journalist”? He’s actually defined as an entertainer.

He is basically a mouthpiece for Russia. He isn’t looking to “tell the truth”. American conservatives will eat it up. The interview will increase the polarization in our country. The sad part is I realize half the country is extremely conservative and probably look to Russia as a source of hope. It’s a place where gays are vilified because it’s a place of “traditional values”. Where a strongman calls the shots. It’s a Christian nationalists dream.

This whole interview is traitorous and bullsht. All it will do is further erode support for additional assistance to Ukraine and show our WW2 allies we have issues.

I haven't read the responses to this thread yet, but you do realize that Russia was our WWII ally? Ands some (many?) historians views the battle of Leningrad (where 2 million Russians died) is what defeated Hitler.

I think a Russian troll farm is writing on this forum. Sad.

Nope. I live in MA in a lovely green leafy suburb of Boston. There's nothing wrong with understanding history and context and stepping out of one's comfort zone in trying to understand other people's perspectives. The world is not made up of simplistic stories where there is one "right" and one "wrong" side. I've never watched a Tucker Carlson interview before but I'm watching his one with Putin now and I am struck by the amount of time he is allowing Putin to provide his perspective of historic context.

Generally speaking, thoughtful people don’t look to propaganda outlets for “other perspectives,” and you certainly don’t need Vladimir Putin to provide historical context. You’re getting played. Happily, apparently.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen the clip today where he talks about “why” he went over there and how it’s “his amendment amendment right as a journalist”? He’s actually defined as an entertainer.

He is basically a mouthpiece for Russia. He isn’t looking to “tell the truth”. American conservatives will eat it up. The interview will increase the polarization in our country. The sad part is I realize half the country is extremely conservative and probably look to Russia as a source of hope. It’s a place where gays are vilified because it’s a place of “traditional values”. Where a strongman calls the shots. It’s a Christian nationalists dream.

This whole interview is traitorous and bullsht. All it will do is further erode support for additional assistance to Ukraine and show our WW2 allies we have issues.

I haven't read the responses to this thread yet, but you do realize that Russia was our WWII ally? Ands some (many?) historians views the battle of Leningrad (where 2 million Russians died) is what defeated Hitler.

I think a Russian troll farm is writing on this forum. Sad.

Nope. I live in MA in a lovely green leafy suburb of Boston. There's nothing wrong with understanding history and context and stepping out of one's comfort zone in trying to understand other people's perspectives. The world is not made up of simplistic stories where there is one "right" and one "wrong" side. I've never watched a Tucker Carlson interview before but I'm watching his one with Putin now and I am struck by the amount of time he is allowing Putin to provide his perspective of historic context.

Generally speaking, thoughtful people don’t look to propaganda outlets for “other perspectives,” and you certainly don’t need Vladimir Putin to provide historical context. You’re getting played. Happily, apparently.

+1

All if these people turning to "alternative facts" is just pathetic. They *think* they are smarter than everyone else, but at the end of the day, not so much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen the clip today where he talks about “why” he went over there and how it’s “his amendment amendment right as a journalist”? He’s actually defined as an entertainer.

He is basically a mouthpiece for Russia. He isn’t looking to “tell the truth”. American conservatives will eat it up. The interview will increase the polarization in our country. The sad part is I realize half the country is extremely conservative and probably look to Russia as a source of hope. It’s a place where gays are vilified because it’s a place of “traditional values”. Where a strongman calls the shots. It’s a Christian nationalists dream.

This whole interview is traitorous and bullsht. All it will do is further erode support for additional assistance to Ukraine and show our WW2 allies we have issues.

I haven't read the responses to this thread yet, but you do realize that Russia was our WWII ally? Ands some (many?) historians views the battle of Leningrad (where 2 million Russians died) is what defeated Hitler.

I think a Russian troll farm is writing on this forum. Sad.

Nope. I live in MA in a lovely green leafy suburb of Boston. There's nothing wrong with understanding history and context and stepping out of one's comfort zone in trying to understand other people's perspectives. The world is not made up of simplistic stories where there is one "right" and one "wrong" side. I've never watched a Tucker Carlson interview before but I'm watching his one with Putin now and I am struck by the amount of time he is allowing Putin to provide his perspective of historic context.

You've been brainwashed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s cool how Trump has flipped everything. Now the anti war edgy journalism is coming from traditional American side. The leftists are now the warmongering stodgy and easily offended side.

This is supposed to be Tucker now because of this interview? Ahahahahahahahahahahaha!

If you follow the progression of things, Tucker has overtly advanced a neo-isolationist perspective on Russia’s attack on Ukraine the entire time. He’s doing that because he knows it’s popular to do that on the right. Evangelicals like Russia (anti-gay, “traditional values” etc) and Trump felates Putin at every turn. So basically this interview was more right wing pandering. I know you don’t get it. Or heck maybe you’re some paid shill in a room somewhere writing sympathetic sht. This is the internet. Who knows.

I don't get that at all. Putin is sticking to his neo-Nazi story as one of his justifications for invading the Ukraine. By that same logic, he could invade the US. He won't, but his logic still doesn't hold water, so there's clearly some other reason for his invasion.

By that logic he needs to invade Russia because there are lots of neo-Nazis in Russia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen the clip today where he talks about “why” he went over there and how it’s “his amendment amendment right as a journalist”? He’s actually defined as an entertainer.

He is basically a mouthpiece for Russia. He isn’t looking to “tell the truth”. American conservatives will eat it up. The interview will increase the polarization in our country. The sad part is I realize half the country is extremely conservative and probably look to Russia as a source of hope. It’s a place where gays are vilified because it’s a place of “traditional values”. Where a strongman calls the shots. It’s a Christian nationalists dream.

This whole interview is traitorous and bullsht. All it will do is further erode support for additional assistance to Ukraine and show our WW2 allies we have issues.

I haven't read the responses to this thread yet, but you do realize that Russia was our WWII ally? Ands some (many?) historians views the battle of Leningrad (where 2 million Russians died) is what defeated Hitler.

I think a Russian troll farm is writing on this forum. Sad.

Nope. I live in MA in a lovely green leafy suburb of Boston. There's nothing wrong with understanding history and context and stepping out of one's comfort zone in trying to understand other people's perspectives. The world is not made up of simplistic stories where there is one "right" and one "wrong" side. I've never watched a Tucker Carlson interview before but I'm watching his one with Putin now and I am struck by the amount of time he is allowing Putin to provide his perspective of historic context.

Putin isn't giving historic context. He's giving his own made-up fairy tales as cover for his revanchist imperialism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen the clip today where he talks about “why” he went over there and how it’s “his amendment amendment right as a journalist”? He’s actually defined as an entertainer.

He is basically a mouthpiece for Russia. He isn’t looking to “tell the truth”. American conservatives will eat it up. The interview will increase the polarization in our country. The sad part is I realize half the country is extremely conservative and probably look to Russia as a source of hope. It’s a place where gays are vilified because it’s a place of “traditional values”. Where a strongman calls the shots. It’s a Christian nationalists dream.

This whole interview is traitorous and bullsht. All it will do is further erode support for additional assistance to Ukraine and show our WW2 allies we have issues.

I haven't read the responses to this thread yet, but you do realize that Russia was our WWII ally? Ands some (many?) historians views the battle of Leningrad (where 2 million Russians died) is what defeated Hitler.

I think a Russian troll farm is writing on this forum. Sad.

Nope. I live in MA in a lovely green leafy suburb of Boston. There's nothing wrong with understanding history and context and stepping out of one's comfort zone in trying to understand other people's perspectives. The world is not made up of simplistic stories where there is one "right" and one "wrong" side. I've never watched a Tucker Carlson interview before but I'm watching his one with Putin now and I am struck by the amount of time he is allowing Putin to provide his perspective of historic context.

You've been brainwashed.

As have you. Everyone’s brainwashed to a certain extent or another by whatever media they watch. All media is propaganda, which is what the middlebrow boomer Blue MAGA contingent on here fails to acknowledge because they’re stuck in their comfortable petit bourgeois bubble.

[Anonymous]

Has Tucker Carlson returned safely to the United States or is Putin housing him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen the clip today where he talks about “why” he went over there and how it’s “his amendment amendment right as a journalist”? He’s actually defined as an entertainer.

He is basically a mouthpiece for Russia. He isn’t looking to “tell the truth”. American conservatives will eat it up. The interview will increase the polarization in our country. The sad part is I realize half the country is extremely conservative and probably look to Russia as a source of hope. It’s a place where gays are vilified because it’s a place of “traditional values”. Where a strongman calls the shots. It’s a Christian nationalists dream.

This whole interview is traitorous and bullsht. All it will do is further erode support for additional assistance to Ukraine and show our WW2 allies we have issues.

I haven't read the responses to this thread yet, but you do realize that Russia was our WWII ally? Ands some (many?) historians views the battle of Leningrad (where 2 million Russians died) is what defeated Hitler.

I think a Russian troll farm is writing on this forum. Sad.

Nope. I live in MA in a lovely green leafy suburb of Boston. There's nothing wrong with understanding history and context and stepping out of one's comfort zone in trying to understand other people's perspectives. The world is not made up of simplistic stories where there is one "right" and one "wrong" side. I've never watched a Tucker Carlson interview before but I'm watching his one with Putin now and I am struck by the amount of time he is allowing Putin to provide his perspective of historic context.

You've been brainwashed.

As have you. Everyone’s brainwashed to a certain extent or another by whatever media they watch. All media is propaganda, which is what the middlebrow boomer Blue MAGA contingent on here fails to acknowledge because they’re stuck in their comfortable petit bourgeois bubble.

“Petit bourgeois bubble”? “Boomer blue MAGA”? What?

No, not all media is propaganda. That’s what people who make propaganda want people to think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s cool how Trump has flipped everything. Now the anti war edgy journalism is coming from traditional American side. The leftists are now the warmongering stodgy and easily offended side.

This is supposed to be Tucker now because of this interview? Ahahahahahahahahahahaha!

If you follow the progression of things, Tucker has overtly advanced a neo-isolationist perspective on Russia’s attack on Ukraine the entire time. He’s doing that because he knows it’s popular to do that on the right. Evangelicals like Russia (anti-gay, “traditional values” etc) and Trump felates Putin at every turn. So basically this interview was more right wing pandering. I know you don’t get it. Or heck maybe you’re some paid shill in a room somewhere writing sympathetic sht. This is the internet. Who knows.

I don't get that at all. Putin is sticking to his neo-Nazi story as one of his justifications for invading the Ukraine. By that same logic, he could invade the US. He won't, but his logic still doesn't hold water, so there's clearly some other reason for his invasion.

By that logic he needs to invade Russia because there are lots of neo-Nazis in Russia.

Putin considers parts of Ukraine to be ethnically Russian. So, by his logic, he is invading Russia to remove the neo-Nazi threat. It's logically consistent, but the premise is flawed.

[Anonymous]

He wants Ukraine because it used to be “his”
He wants Ukraine because he wants access to the sea ports

The end

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s cool how Trump has flipped everything. Now the anti war edgy journalism is coming from traditional American side. The leftists are now the warmongering stodgy and easily offended side.

This is supposed to be Tucker now because of this interview? Ahahahahahahahahahahaha!

If you follow the progression of things, Tucker has overtly advanced a neo-isolationist perspective on Russia’s attack on Ukraine the entire time. He’s doing that because he knows it’s popular to do that on the right. Evangelicals like Russia (anti-gay, “traditional values” etc) and Trump felates Putin at every turn. So basically this interview was more right wing pandering. I know you don’t get it. Or heck maybe you’re some paid shill in a room somewhere writing sympathetic sht. This is the internet. Who knows.

I don't get that at all. Putin is sticking to his neo-Nazi story as one of his justifications for invading the Ukraine. By that same logic, he could invade the US. He won't, but his logic still doesn't hold water, so there's clearly some other reason for his invasion.

By that logic he needs to invade Russia because there are lots of neo-Nazis in Russia.

Putin considers parts of Ukraine to be ethnically Russian. So, by his logic, he is invading Russia to remove the neo-Nazi threat. It's logically consistent, but the premise is flawed.

It’s not even logically consistent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has Tucker Carlson returned safely to the United States or is Putin housing him?

It would be nice if he just stayed in Russia where he belongs.