So you will not answer the question. Because it defeats your agenda is the assumption. |
Agenda is removing discrimination and installing fair competition. Hopefully the Supreme Court will make the right decision. |
But if you answered the question honestly, it would show that you know it is not actually discrimination. That's why you won't answer. |
It is discrimination. No individual should experience racial discrimination. |
So you STILL won't answer the question? This shows you only care about your agenda, and have no desire to understand the complexity of the situation and the challenges therein. Shameful. |
DP. How many times have you posted your stupid question? Can you answer your own damn question? With proof? |
Yes I can answer the question. Of course. And so can you. Yes, under current policies any race benefits at any college where they are under-represented. At every college which has anything other than open admissions. Which means it is NOT, by design, prejudiced against any one race. |
+1 Exactly. Unfortunately SCOTUS is only considering one college at a time. |
The only colleges where Asians (and whites) are under represented are historically black colleges. In 2016, the total college enrollment rate was higher for Asian young adults (58 percent) than for young adults who were of Two or more races (42 percent), White (42 percent), Hispanic (39 percent), Black (36 percent), Pacific Islander (21 percent), and American Indian/Alaska Native (19 percent).” |
Your first sentence is not proved by what follows, and is in fact is non-sequitur. It is also completely false. Here are a few examples proving you are wrong: https://www.collegefactual.com/colleges/washington-and-lee-university/student-life/diversity/chart-undergraduate-racial-ethnic-diversity.html https://www.collegefactual.com/colleges/hamilton-college/student-life/diversity/chart-undergraduate-racial-ethnic-diversity.html https://www.collegefactual.com/colleges/bates-college/student-life/diversity/chart-undergraduate-racial-ethnic-diversity.html https://www.collegefactual.com/colleges/middlebury-college/student-life/diversity/chart-undergraduate-racial-ethnic-diversity.html Those are all highly selective colleges where Asians are URMs. I could keep going but the point is made, yours is proved false. |
+1 again. They're either misunderstanding or abusing statistics in order to try to make a point that is easily refuted. |
It's nice to see those in favor of racial discrimination against Asians are in a panic mode for the SCOTUS decision in June! |
No one is in favor of discrimination against Asians, or any race. At least no one here. Strawman, fail, -1. Some don't agree that the current policy is discriminatory against Asians, and this thread demonstrates those posters seem to be the ones with facts to refute the other position. |
even two of these are like about 7% and 7+% lol that's not under represented. The good LACs have plenty Asians. |
It's not a question of whether colleges have Asians or not - it is whether they benefit from colleges where they are not ORM. Only Middlebury from that list is equal to the USA in enrolled students. Which means they are not discriminated against at a minimum, and likely benefit from the policy because they are not ORM. And I built that list at random, and those were the first four I searched. Again, you fail. |