So you must be here quite a lot yourself. |
Excellent points -- thanks |
BS -- if you didn't care, you wouldn't be here fighting with non-believers. I'm here because I DO care, and, like atheist pp above, I acknowledge it. |
Also, many believers don't care much at all what others believe. Their religion brings them comfort - so what that others don't believe it? |
DP. We’re arguing with you because you deliberately try to trash every religion thread, often to the point where we can’t have adult conversations. Why is it so important for you to do that? |
DP's definition of "adult conversations" equal no disagreements with a particular Christian point of view. Keep in mind that this is a discussion board, open to all. It's not a church with beliefs that must be upheld under pain of eternal damnation. |
Says the guy posting in a thread about the lightning fast grown of non-believers. Oh the irony. But make no mistake, you are welcome here, always. We're still waiting for evidence of why you believe what you believe, and you haven't even tried to answer that. |
You’ve derailed this thread to make it about yourself. That’s the problem here. You tell yourself that X&Y group doesn’t like disagreement, but really, we don’t want to talk about you and your atheism on every single thread. You’re not as interesting as you think you are. |
Look who's talking! |
|
Let's remember, too, that not all religious people agree. If they did, there would not be so many different religions and so many different denominations within one religion. |
The poll is obviously over broad and misleading. Lots of people believe there is a god-like creative force at work in the universe; they just don't believe in the humans who claim to have a direction connection to it and know all the special "rules." |
I disagree with the this Court on most things, for sure. However, your argument is a bit too broad here. If you have taken any philosophy or law courses, you would know that our entire legal system is premised on the same moral philosophy as most modern religions. The separation of Church and state was meant to keep the state out of religions and to prohibit one formal religion from being established by government; but there never actually was a time in human history when religion, as in moral philosophy, was not involved in the state. Most laws are premised on western religious philosophy. It is a fascinating area of study, and for our own good as a country on the brink of huge change, we all need to read up on it so we can figure this out. Take your premise that your government cannot infringe on your religious freedom by passing a law. This obviously isn't true. Polygamy has been outlawed in every state, even though at least one religious sect embraces it as a moral mandate. If a satanist cult believe human sacrifice was a moral need and had willing victims who shared this belief, they would not be exempt from laws against murder and assisted suicide (assuming a willing victim). So the approach to this ruling is going to have to be much more nuanced than saying the law can't ever infringe on my religious practices (it can and it has because there are limits and exceptions), nor can you say that no religious belief can be encoded in laws, as almost every criminal law and most tort law has a religious parallel. |
The details of this are actually in the article. Only 42% believe in a god that "Hears prayers and intervenes". Another 28% believe in one that "% Hears prayers only" (not sure what the point of that is. The most important data shows that belief is down in all measured categories, and has doubled overall in a decade. |
Someone to talk to, I guess, who is always available. Sometimes it helps just to get something off your chest. |