APS: Think the "no move" campaign is going to work?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone going to the meeting? Post updates here! Then let's start a new thread to speculate about the boundary process...

Please please please let's all agree to abandon this thread in favor of a watch party thread tonight.

Tequila shot every time someone says “data”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone going to the meeting? Post updates here! Then let's start a new thread to speculate about the boundary process...

Please please please let's all agree to abandon this thread in favor of a watch party thread tonight.

Get Jeff’s agreement. Otherwise new thread will be reported and deleted

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone going to the meeting? Post updates here! Then let's start a new thread to speculate about the boundary process...

Please please please let's all agree to abandon this thread in favor of a watch party thread tonight.

Tequila shot every time someone says “data”?

I’m not trying to die tonight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone going to the meeting? Post updates here! Then let's start a new thread to speculate about the boundary process...

Please please please let's all agree to abandon this thread in favor of a watch party thread tonight.

Get Jeff’s agreement. Otherwise new thread will be reported and deleted

The board meeting will cover more than this specific topic, so I see no reason why it shouldn’t be its own thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone going to the meeting? Post updates here! Then let's start a new thread to speculate about the boundary process...

Please please please let's all agree to abandon this thread in favor of a watch party thread tonight.

Get Jeff’s agreement. Otherwise new thread will be reported and deleted

I’ll post to website feedback and ask Jeff.

[Anonymous]

The suspense is killing me. What do you think the final vote will be? Unanimous?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The suspense is killing me. What do you think the final vote will be? Unanimous?

I hear McKinley is already planning a candlelight vigil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The suspense is killing me. What do you think the final vote will be? Unanimous?

Thread is now open if you want too ask it there.

[Anonymous]

Key had the kids make valentines to the school and post them around the school. Your educational dollars at work

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone going to the meeting? Post updates here! Then let's start a new thread to speculate about the boundary process...

Please please please let's all agree to abandon this thread in favor of a watch party thread tonight.

Tequila shot every time someone says “data”?

I’m not trying to die tonight

ha! imagine the comments on ARL if you did.

Local mom dies of alcohol poisoning while watching school board meeting.
comments:
Surprised it doesn't happen more often.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Key had the kids make valentines to the school and post them around the school. Your educational dollars at work

Oh the horror. What is wrong with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone going to the meeting? Post updates here! Then let's start a new thread to speculate about the boundary process...

Please please please let's all agree to abandon this thread in favor of a watch party thread tonight.

Tequila shot every time someone says “data”?

I’m not trying to die tonight

Show some respect and pour one out for our McKinley homies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Key had the kids make valentines to the school and post them around the school. Your educational dollars at work

Long live the fake news!

[Anonymous]

so 44% of Ashlawn moves and 33% of Taylor moves and 90% Mck to Reed while another 10% split up to respective schools?
sooooo is APS sending 44% of of Ashlawn staff to the new schools? Is APS staff sending 33% of Taylor staff to the new schools the students will attend? Mck?
Is this the plan for staff in these scenarios that people seem to talk so much about?
I'm really confused why staff are not treated as grown adults who can choose to go to whatever school they want? Including staying put if they so choose? If I'm not mistaken, APS cannot FORCE staff to do anything can they? If they were given a job at a building, can they keep it if they want? Take a teacher hired at Key Immersion, was his/her employment tied to the program or building? What does that look like when the teacher at Key wants to stay with building because it's better for their commute etc? By law, do they have this choice? My vote is let them all be adults and make decisions for themselves, no dictating to teachers/staff what they HAVE to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:so 44% of Ashlawn moves and 33% of Taylor moves and 90% Mck to Reed while another 10% split up to respective schools?
sooooo is APS sending 44% of of Ashlawn staff to the new schools? Is APS staff sending 33% of Taylor staff to the new schools the students will attend? Mck?
Is this the plan for staff in these scenarios that people seem to talk so much about?
I'm really confused why staff are not treated as grown adults who can choose to go to whatever school they want? Including staying put if they so choose? If I'm not mistaken, APS cannot FORCE staff to do anything can they? If they were given a job at a building, can they keep it if they want? Take a teacher hired at Key Immersion, was his/her employment tied to the program or building? What does that look like when the teacher at Key wants to stay with building because it's better for their commute etc? By law, do they have this choice? My vote is let them all be adults and make decisions for themselves, no dictating to teachers/staff what they HAVE to do.

I'm a teacher and I can't imagine not having a choice in whether or not I want to stay or move. I can't see APS telling staff where they have to go. I can see them providing options to staff.