ECNL moving to school year not calendar

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You don’t think MLSN academies will stay BY??? They are a different animal and not P2P.

Being on a different age range than MLS P2P will make it too difficult for MLSN academies to evaluate players, meaning the wrong kids in MLS P2P will be starring in games and will be fool's gold. They want easy and don't want to pick the wrong players.

Queue the Biobanding crazies…Just bioband 1/3 of the team and then you have BY+SY=WTF.

You may not like it but when youre the top tier of boys youth soccer you make the rules.

lol, total dbag comment . MLSN is another transient alphabet league. Have you been living under a rock the last few decades?

A alphabet league with contracts where players play for free because the pro teams they're associated with are funding their development. But, other than that exactly the same. Oh and the players are 10x better. But again other than that exactly the same.

It sounds like you would be willing to buy this extra bridge I have for sale in Brooklyn.

Does it really matter if youre playing for free and being considered by pro teams? Even if things dont work out for playing pro you become a top college recruit.

Or you can dork around in ECNL and get looked over by college coaches who favor both local and international academy players.

Seriously, I can get you a really good price on this bridge…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You don’t think MLSN academies will stay BY??? They are a different animal and not P2P.

Being on a different age range than MLS P2P will make it too difficult for MLSN academies to evaluate players, meaning the wrong kids in MLS P2P will be starring in games and will be fool's gold. They want easy and don't want to pick the wrong players.

🤣 and we’ve come full circle to why US Soccer changed to BY, and has kept a BY option…. Y’all are stupid

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You don’t think MLSN academies will stay BY??? They are a different animal and not P2P.

Being on a different age range than MLS P2P will make it too difficult for MLSN academies to evaluate players, meaning the wrong kids in MLS P2P will be starring in games and will be fool's gold. They want easy and don't want to pick the wrong players.

Queue the Biobanding crazies…Just bioband 1/3 of the team and then you have BY+SY=WTF.

You may not like it but when youre the top tier of boys youth soccer you make the rules.

lol, total dbag comment . MLSN is another transient alphabet league. Have you been living under a rock the last few decades?

A alphabet league with contracts where players play for free because the pro teams they're associated with are funding their development. But, other than that exactly the same. Oh and the players are 10x better. But again other than that exactly the same.

It sounds like you would be willing to buy this extra bridge I have for sale in Brooklyn.

Does it really matter if youre playing for free and being considered by pro teams? Even if things dont work out for playing pro you become a top college recruit.

Or you can dork around in ECNL and get looked over by college coaches who favor both local and international academy players.

I doubt the PP you were responding to even has a kid in MLSN. It sounds like they’ve justified why they aren’t in a P2P MLSN, and maybe ECNL or some other secondary (or tertiary) boys league.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is going back off the rails! What ever happens to the guy who said GA was announcing 8/1 and the commissioner told them this.

Where are you!? Why did you lie to us!….

You mean the guy that kept saying "Trish the Commish" and that it was a lock that GA would announce XYZ on ABC date?

I dont understand what people like this gain. If youre just being a troll fine. But theres better ways to troll people. And dont throw a date out because you paint yourself in the corner.

If I could screen shot the email from the commish I would. I feel betrayed! One day we will all know what they’re going to do. Until then, lets discuss the leagues and US v Canada soccer.

I believe you , no need for screen shot. You feel betrayed because you are assuming they have a meticulously planned roadmap and being able to execute it.

But this is American youth soccer league, I imagine some of them are just winging it week from week.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is going back off the rails! What ever happens to the guy who said GA was announcing 8/1 and the commissioner told them this.

Where are you!? Why did you lie to us!….

You mean the guy that kept saying "Trish the Commish" and that it was a lock that GA would announce XYZ on ABC date?

I dont understand what people like this gain. If youre just being a troll fine. But theres better ways to troll people. And dont throw a date out because you paint yourself in the corner.

If I could screen shot the email from the commish I would. I feel betrayed! One day we will all know what they’re going to do. Until then, lets discuss the leagues and US v Canada soccer.

I believe you , no need for screen shot. You feel betrayed because you are assuming they have a meticulously planned roadmap and being able to execute it.

But this is American youth soccer league, I imagine some of them are just winging it week from week.

You might as well believe in candyland.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You don’t think MLSN academies will stay BY??? They are a different animal and not P2P.

Being on a different age range than MLS P2P will make it too difficult for MLSN academies to evaluate players, meaning the wrong kids in MLS P2P will be starring in games and will be fool's gold. They want easy and don't want to pick the wrong players.

Queue the Biobanding crazies…Just bioband 1/3 of the team and then you have BY+SY=WTF.

You may not like it but when youre the top tier of boys youth soccer you make the rules.

A lot of U-littles rec league has stayed SY since the switch, so I guess the bottom tier also get to make the rules.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You don’t think MLSN academies will stay BY??? They are a different animal and not P2P.

Being on a different age range than MLS P2P will make it too difficult for MLSN academies to evaluate players, meaning the wrong kids in MLS P2P will be starring in games and will be fool's gold. They want easy and don't want to pick the wrong players.

Queue the Biobanding crazies…Just bioband 1/3 of the team and then you have BY+SY=WTF.

You may not like it but when youre the top tier of boys youth soccer you make the rules.

Until you go belly up like DA that is.

[Anonymous]

Good Lord. What are y'all rambling on about? This thread isn't even remotely related to the age change anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good Lord. What are y'all rambling on about? This thread isn't even remotely related to the age change anymore.

The rae worshiping 2nd string boys parents think if they group up enough ulittle leagues that MLSN will change from BY to SY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You don’t think MLSN academies will stay BY??? They are a different animal and not P2P.

Being on a different age range than MLS P2P will make it too difficult for MLSN academies to evaluate players, meaning the wrong kids in MLS P2P will be starring in games and will be fool's gold. They want easy and don't want to pick the wrong players.

Queue the Biobanding crazies…Just bioband 1/3 of the team and then you have BY+SY=WTF.

You may not like it but when youre the top tier of boys youth soccer you make the rules.

lol, total dbag comment . MLSN is another transient alphabet league. Have you been living under a rock the last few decades?

A alphabet league with contracts where players play for free because the pro teams they're associated with are funding their development. But, other than that exactly the same. Oh and the players are 10x better. But again other than that exactly the same.

It sounds like you would be willing to buy this extra bridge I have for sale in Brooklyn.

Does it really matter if youre playing for free and being considered by pro teams? Even if things dont work out for playing pro you become a top college recruit.

Or you can dork around in ECNL and get looked over by college coaches who favor both local and international academy players.

Compare the probability of quitting soccer over an injury and the probability of going pro. Then you will see that the pro angle was all a mirage.

[Anonymous]

How long until this lawyer is running a Crossfire special?

https://pcva.law/ongoing-investigation/blackhills-football-club/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good Lord. What are y'all rambling on about? This thread isn't even remotely related to the age change anymore.

The rae worshiping 2nd string boys parents think if they group up enough ulittle leagues that MLSN will change from BY to SY.

Let me guess you have an average Q1 kid….

[Anonymous]

Anyone wants to see what technical women's soccer looks like, just watch Spain in the Euros.

It was honestly just a matter of time before Europe started surpassing the US now that they are putting money and resources behind it.

I am afraid the days of just being superior athletes is probably over. Hope US Soccer has a plan or else the women become more like the men in world stature………

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone wants to see what technical women's soccer looks like, just watch Spain in the Euros.

It was honestly just a matter of time before Europe started surpassing the US now that they are putting money and resources behind it.

I am afraid the days of just being superior athletes is probably over. Hope US Soccer has a plan or else the women become more like the men in world stature………

Have you watched these last 3 friendlies? The WNT is very technically skilled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone wants to see what technical women's soccer looks like, just watch Spain in the Euros.

It was honestly just a matter of time before Europe started surpassing the US now that they are putting money and resources behind it.

I am afraid the days of just being superior athletes is probably over. Hope US Soccer has a plan or else the women become more like the men in world stature………

Canada has beaten the US recently and just got dismantled 3-0 with a random group of new players. US Women still has a very strong pipeline that won't disappear overnight.