Kate's New Picture

Anonymous
I shudder to think what her children will go through when they are old enough to Google their parents names.

Your idle speculation is not without harm.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I just don't see how a divorce is possible. The RF clearly needs Kate, especially if William might be king sooner than anticipated. She has no incentive to leave because she would never get full custody of her kids. Under what scenario would both sides come to the conclusion of divorce?

I think as some PPs have suggested, she is using this chance to leverage something in a possibly unhappy marriage. Then once that has been figured out, things will go back to normal and we will never know what really happened.


Why do you think Kate would only accept full custody?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn't Rose also married?


Her DH is reportedly gay.


Her children are rumored to have been fathered by some one else


Her twins are older than Prince George. If they are really Willy's then they'd be 3rd & 4th in line.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:People, this is 2024. She has three young kids and enough money to do whatever she wants. Zero chance she is going to ditch her kids. C'mon.

no one's saying she's ditching her kids. no one.


It’s just she may not have legal custody of them. The British Royal family will have custody of her children and she may get to see them once a week.

stop. even Diana saw her kids post divorce. This isn't scientology.


This is like people thinking Charles would take Harry's kids lol. She will see the kids and be an active part of their lives.


These bortches are crazy. They have no IRL friends but believe they know the intimate details of the lives of some truly rich, famous, and (justifiably) paranoid folk


Oh you're confused. I completely believe Kate had nothing to do with that doctored up photo and is playing hardball with William and the family.

You aren't better then anyone else on this fourm. We are all on the discussing and theorizing.


Oh, I’m better than you, and that’s why you flinched and freaked at the comment. Deal.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I shudder to think what her children will go through when they are old enough to Google their parents names.

Your idle speculation is not without harm.


We get it. You're a fan of their coupling and don't think they can exist separately or even come to terms that William botched up the PR.
Anonymous
Hands may have still been bandaged or scarred at original photo time.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I shudder to think what her children will go through when they are old enough to Google their parents names.

Your idle speculation is not without harm.


We get it. You're a fan of their coupling and don't think they can exist separately or even come to terms that William botched up the PR.


Is “we” just you, or you plus the strange visions you have that you are an insider regarding anything, anywhere?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can someone please link the photos from November that show the family wearing outfits similar to the ones in the Mother’s Day pic?


There is a video linked in this very thread on that topic.


This thread is 103 pages an and counting! Please repost.


Why should I go and search for it rather than you doing so? Talk about entitled.

Google online baby bank event
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just don't see how a divorce is possible. The RF clearly needs Kate, especially if William might be king sooner than anticipated. She has no incentive to leave because she would never get full custody of her kids. Under what scenario would both sides come to the conclusion of divorce?

I think as some PPs have suggested, she is using this chance to leverage something in a possibly unhappy marriage. Then once that has been figured out, things will go back to normal and we will never know what really happened.


Why do you think Kate would only accept full custody?


I don't think she wants anything less than what she has now, full custody. Why would she walk away from that?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:People, this is 2024. She has three young kids and enough money to do whatever she wants. Zero chance she is going to ditch her kids. C'mon.

no one's saying she's ditching her kids. no one.


It’s just she may not have legal custody of them. The British Royal family will have custody of her children and she may get to see them once a week.

stop. even Diana saw her kids post divorce. This isn't scientology.


This is like people thinking Charles would take Harry's kids lol. She will see the kids and be an active part of their lives.


These bortches are crazy. They have no IRL friends but believe they know the intimate details of the lives of some truly rich, famous, and (justifiably) paranoid folk


Oh you're confused. I completely believe Kate had nothing to do with that doctored up photo and is playing hardball with William and the family.

You aren't better then anyone else on this fourm. We are all on the discussing and theorizing.


Oh, I’m better than you, and that’s why you flinched and freaked at the comment. Deal.


Huh..............
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just don't see how a divorce is possible. The RF clearly needs Kate, especially if William might be king sooner than anticipated. She has no incentive to leave because she would never get full custody of her kids. Under what scenario would both sides come to the conclusion of divorce?

I think as some PPs have suggested, she is using this chance to leverage something in a possibly unhappy marriage. Then once that has been figured out, things will go back to normal and we will never know what really happened.


Why do you think Kate would only accept full custody?


I don't think she wants anything less than what she has now, full custody. Why would she walk away from that?


She doesn't have full custody now.
Anonymous
I think you are all insane.

She was photographed in a car with her husband today. So, (1) she's alive. And (2) They were apparently going separate places, but chose to use the same car. When you have their resources, you really don't have to do that. If they hated each other or were in some prolonged battle, that just wouldn't happen.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty convincing that the Mother’s Day photo was an old photo edited to look new. But why - the Mothers Day 2023 insta photo was from the same photo shoot as the Christmas 2022 shoot; they also used a photo in the same clothes for Kate & Wills’ anniversary in 2023. So old photos shouldn’t matter.

My question is, whoever did the editing, why did they edit out her ring? Photos from the charity event show her wearing it, so one would assume they intentionally edited it out. But why? Bizarre.


I agree, it's so odd. The easiest explanation is that she just wasn't wearing the ring for this photo. I do think it was taken the same day as the baby bank video based on the clothes, but it looks like it was taken at home. Maybe she doesn't wear that giant ring 100% of the time at home but always wears it for public events, and this might have just been a photo taken at home (maybe even actually by William) because the kids were dressed up and Kate's hair and makeup were done for the event and they wanted a cute pic of the four of them together.

I also don't see any obvious photoshopping on her hand itself that would indicate the ring was removed from the photo. I think she just wasn't wearing it.


This person thinks Kate's hand was photoshopped. https://twitter.com/byetwit/status/1766844203445657913?s=20


Yikes! As if Kate would be photoshopping her whole hands like this. They need a better excuse


OMG!! SHE LOST HER HANDS!!!


Dear her fingers are clearly photoshopped. Nothing about this situation is funny.


No it's not funny. She was probably wearing her ring in the original photo, but they photoshopped and deleted her ring or added someone's hand without the ring. It's a sign for us "The crazies" to prepare for something big coming on the Sunday after Easter!!! Everything they are giving us so far are actually preludes, not PR disasters.



The announcement referenced some time after Easter, NOT the Sunday after Easter.
Anonymous
Kate has moved in Tyler Perry's Cali mansion and soon Oprah will interview her. Netflix and Spotify deals being negotiated. Her new PR team is brainstorming about a name for her charity while recruiting chicks for her chicken coop. Simple family life like her BIL and SIL who are babysitting her kids until she settles down in 90210.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I think you are all insane.

She was photographed in a car with her husband today. So, (1) she's alive. And (2) They were apparently going separate places, but chose to use the same car. When you have their resources, you really don't have to do that. If they hated each other or were in some prolonged battle, that just wouldn't happen.


They are crazy, but they are specifically and deeply invested in a woman being suicidal, or getting dumped, or losing her kids. It’s very, very odd, but has nothing to do with that woman.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: