VHSL Boys 2024 Season (Discussion and Scores)

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's rivalry day - some good games tonight:

McLean @ Yorktown (Yorktown -2.5)
Battlefield @ Patriot (Battlefield -4.5)
Robinson @ Lake Braddock (Robinson -6)
Oakton @ Madison (Madison -7)
South Lakes @ Westfield (South Lakes -2)


Yorktown by 1
Battlefield by 6
Robinson by 10
Madison by 6
Westfield by 1 to be different


Let’s see how this ages
YT 8 McLean 6
BF 11 Patriot 4
Robo 18 LB 5
Madison 13 Oakton 5
Westfield 8 SL 7
Anonymous
3-1 Yorktown after one. Really sloppy first quarter for both. #7 scored with one second left in the quarter.
Anonymous
All Yorktown in the 2nd. McLean looks lost. 8-2.
Anonymous
McLean being without their number 2 scoring threat is a big problem but doesn’t explain the collapse on defense
Anonymous
Yorktown got up 10-2. McLean has scored 4 straight. 10-6 in the 4th.
Anonymous
Robinson is up 15-1
Madison is up 15-2
Anonymous
Patriot beat Battlefield
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Patriot beat Battlefield



Score?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Patriot beat Battlefield



Score?


8-7. Looked like Battlefields goalie did not play and maybe had his arm on a sling.
Anonymous
After tonight I’d honestly be surprised if Yorktowns goalie wasn’t dpoy for Liberty
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:After tonight I’d honestly be surprised if Yorktowns goalie wasn’t dpoy for Liberty


He’s good and McLean repeatedly settling for 15+ yard shots made him look ever better.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Patriot beat Battlefield

Good for Patriot! Well coached with some legit players!
Anonymous
Robinson 16-1 final vs Braddock
Anonymous
What was the final score of the Yorktown game? How did both teams look?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What was the final score of the Yorktown game? How did both teams look?


11-6. Very sloppy on both sides. Lots of turnovers, many unforced. Yorktown moved the ball better and has more threats on offense. McLean can’t score and is in trouble.
post reply Forum Index » Lacrosse
Message Quick Reply
Go to: