Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why we need to have Tik Tok banned. It is wackadoo news network.

Sorry you were wrong about the photo being photoshopped.

DP. Three quarters of your Photoshop allegations about this pic are nonsense.

OK, because you know everything, and because you care so very much about Kate, then maybe you'll help us out. What quarter of the Photoshop allegations do you think ARE true?
- Charlotte's sleeve
- Charlotte's skirt
- George's shirt pattern
- Kate's head
- Kate's clothing
- Kate's hand with the side lighting and moving knuckles
- I'm forgetting other things bc there's so much

And more importantly, why, why, why do you think any of that (or your 1/4 of that) was necessary?

Before spouting all of that, learn more about photoshopping and video editing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's so sad. She wanted to give people a pic to stop speculation, and it only made things worse. Now she's stuck bc she doesn't look like the pic so she can't issue another one.

Stop blaming this blunder on Kate as if she actually edited that picture to death 🙄

+1

She can’t edit photos in Photoshop because SHE LOST HER HANDS!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's so sad. She wanted to give people a pic to stop speculation, and it only made things worse. Now she's stuck bc she doesn't look like the pic so she can't issue another one.

Stop blaming this blunder on Kate as if she actually edited that picture to death 🙄

+1

She can’t edit photos in Photoshop because SHE LOST HER HANDS!

Now you're insulting her intelligence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why we need to have Tik Tok banned. It is wackadoo news network.

Sorry you were wrong about the photo being photoshopped.

DP. Three quarters of your Photoshop allegations about this pic are nonsense.

OK, because you know everything, and because you care so very much about Kate, then maybe you'll help us out. What quarter of the Photoshop allegations do you think ARE true?
- Charlotte's sleeve
- Charlotte's skirt
- George's shirt pattern
- Kate's head
- Kate's clothing
- Kate's hand with the side lighting and moving knuckles
- I'm forgetting other things bc there's so much

And more importantly, why, why, why do you think any of that (or your 1/4 of that) was necessary?

Before spouting all of that, learn more about photoshopping and video editing.

that's not a rebuttal. zero points for you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone please link the photos from November that show the family wearing outfits similar to the ones in the Mother’s Day pic?

Here: https://katemiddletonstyle.org/casual-outfit-baby-bank-wales-kids/

I wonder if there’s a hint of little C’s bracelet from this day on her right wrist in the photo published yesterday?

Whether the MD pic was taken last fall or last weekend, the clothes were not edited, like some are saying. The boys are wearing a different shirt and a different sweater. The girls are wearing a different skirt and a different top. Kate has her own head and her own hands. The speculation is just nuts.

It's extremely obvious that Charlotte's skirt was edited. People could see it was heavily edited before anyone even raised the issue of the photo coming from this same day in November. Also the thing with George's collar has to be an edit because a tone-on-tone blue plaid shirt like that doesn't make sense and even if it exists, I don't think they'd put George in it. Same with Charlotte's skirt actually -- the plaid does not match the rest of her outfit and this is a family who tends to be extremely well-coordinated. The color on Louis's sweater also looks off and doesn't look like something he'd wear.

[Anonymous]

No pic of her hands today!! She really did lose them in a freak Photoshop accident.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why we need to have Tik Tok banned. It is wackadoo news network.

Sorry you were wrong about the photo being photoshopped.

DP. Three quarters of your Photoshop allegations about this pic are nonsense.

OK, because you know everything, and because you care so very much about Kate, then maybe you'll help us out. What quarter of the Photoshop allegations do you think ARE true?
- Charlotte's sleeve
- Charlotte's skirt
- George's shirt pattern
- Kate's head
- Kate's clothing
- Kate's hand with the side lighting and moving knuckles
- I'm forgetting other things bc there's so much

And more importantly, why, why, why do you think any of that (or your 1/4 of that) was necessary?

Before spouting all of that, learn more about photoshopping and video editing.

that's not a rebuttal. zero points for you

There's no point rebutting these fantasies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d guess this all has to do with Charles’ petulant jealousy when the public focuses on Kate. He despised the attention Diana received and still hates being upstaged. Will and Kate have to be careful never to upstage Charles and Camilla. This has to be hard to navigate from a PR standpoint because Charles is a pissy twit and Camilla is a hag, former mistress.

My guess is that she did have surgery, and Will and Kate wanted a break while Charles and Camilla’s team didn’t want the younger two grabbing the spotlight. Charles always makes bad decisions and his actions got this mess rolling.

But his initial surgery was initially sold as quick. The cancer diagnosis didn't come until after Kate had announced she was stepping back through Easter.

Are you arguing with Charles' cancer diagnosis (type undisclosed) and treatment?

A British reporter was on camera live TV last week saying he does not have cancer! Someone tried to correct her saying well initially he wasn’t there for cancer, but then he was diagnosed… and she came back saying that’s not what’s wrong with him and I can’t say what it is. 😳

I saw that! No clue why she felt the need to say that.

Is there a link to this story?

https://x.com/glowannelee/status/1765338535077298383?s=46&t=vUyzW6Nmj4eHKi2tRha-Ew

She just sounds confused with the initial diagnosis and, imho, covering up her ignorance.

Yeah she just looked like she was embarrassed that she didn’t know what she was talking about. Sounds like my 4 year old. “I DO know, I’m just not going to TELL you!”

[Anonymous]

The Why, people. The photo was heavily manipulated, some people don’t have a sharp eye, get over it.

So Charles might be King for only a short period due to being ill and Kate is in a Denmarkian situation where it would look bad if William ascended to the throne without her and leveraging her power now.

Interesting theory. I like it.

https://www.bloomberg.com/en/news/thp/2024-03-11/denmark-s-recently-abdicated-queen-margrethe-designs-the-costumes-and-set-for-a-ballet#:~:text=Margrethe%20became%20the%20first%20Danish,she%20formally%20signed%20her%20abdication.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why we need to have Tik Tok banned. It is wackadoo news network.

Sorry you were wrong about the photo being photoshopped.

DP. Three quarters of your Photoshop allegations about this pic are nonsense.

OK, because you know everything, and because you care so very much about Kate, then maybe you'll help us out. What quarter of the Photoshop allegations do you think ARE true?
- Charlotte's sleeve
- Charlotte's skirt
- George's shirt pattern
- Kate's head
- Kate's clothing
- Kate's hand with the side lighting and moving knuckles
- I'm forgetting other things bc there's so much

And more importantly, why, why, why do you think any of that (or your 1/4 of that) was necessary?

Before spouting all of that, learn more about photoshopping and video editing.

that's not a rebuttal. zero points for you

There's no point rebutting these fantasies.

Because you can't. You honestly just sound like a delusional William/Kate fan at this point holding on to dangerous POVs.

[Anonymous]

Does anyone think that she might have tried to commit suicide on December 28 and that's why an ambulance was called? A friend in HS's dad tried killing himself with a gunshot to the head. He survived it, but was badly disfigured.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone please link the photos from November that show the family wearing outfits similar to the ones in the Mother’s Day pic?

Here: https://katemiddletonstyle.org/casual-outfit-baby-bank-wales-kids/

I wonder if there’s a hint of little C’s bracelet from this day on her right wrist in the photo published yesterday?

Whether the MD pic was taken last fall or last weekend, the clothes were not edited, like some are saying. The boys are wearing a different shirt and a different sweater. The girls are wearing a different skirt and a different top. Kate has her own head and her own hands. The speculation is just nuts.

It's extremely obvious that Charlotte's skirt was edited. People could see it was heavily edited before anyone even raised the issue of the photo coming from this same day in November. Also the thing with George's collar has to be an edit because a tone-on-tone blue plaid shirt like that doesn't make sense and even if it exists, I don't think they'd put George in it. Same with Charlotte's skirt actually -- the plaid does not match the rest of her outfit and this is a family who tends to be extremely well-coordinated. The color on Louis's sweater also looks off and doesn't look like something he'd wear.

Charlotte is wearing the skirt. It has a pocket on the side that is sticking out funny. This is the skirt



I think the photo was taken recently, with someone else sitting in for Kate (Pippa?) and then Kate's face (and hands?) were stuck on. I think the TikTok lady is wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

No pic of her hands today!! She really did lose them in a freak Photoshop accident.

What is this pic from?

[Anonymous]

I posted that I speculated a suicidal attempt in the form of Tylenol overdose, which lead to the expected medical complications and a liver transplant (the abdominal surgery). The extended recovery time would make sense for that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daily Mirror reporter says the photo of her face is from her Vogue cover

If this is true, that’s WILD.

I don't buy this. I think Kate is actually in that photo and I don't even think they messed with her face. I think the lighting looks different because Charlotte is blocking part of the light source onto Kate's face, and also because I think they messed with the lighting and white balance on the photo in a way that makes the contrast between Kate's face and the kid's faces more exaggerated.

I should also note here that when people have been doing the photoshop analysis on the photo online, many people are changing the contrast in order to facilitate seeing more detail in certain parts of the photo. As a result, there are quite a few images of this photo online that are doctored even more than what was posted by the Wales's, and this might be contributing to the speculation about Kate's face being photoshopped in because if you change the contrast on this photo, it will make the kid's face brighter and Kate's face darker every time, because they are in light and her face is slightly shadowed by Charlotte's body and also just being surrounded by the kids.

What about the lighting on her left hand? It's very much from the left.

But that makes no sense because if the allegation is that they used the Vogue cover to photoshop her into the picture, where did the hand come from? If they were actually photoshopping her into the photo, presumably there was an actual person there with the kids and it's her hand. So arguing over the lighting of her hand makes no sense.

Also, think people. If Kensington Palace was going to photoshop the Princess of Wales into a photo, WHY would they use a Vogue cover to do it. I think the Palace has a few photos of Kate lying around, I don't think they'd need to use a photo from a magazine cover.

Maybe Kate looks similar in both photos because (gasp!) it's the same person.

I actually do think that photo is photoshopped to death (I think it was a photo from last November they doctored to try and pass as more recent) but the speculation about them photoshopping her head in makes no sense at all. Kate was seen publicly with her kids in November and December. She was photographed with them. If they were going to use an old photo for the MD picture, they didn't need to photoshop Kate in. She was in the picture. It just wasn't taken in 2024. That's the part they lied/are lying about.