Another gunman, another elementary school

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Grooming gun lust in young kids like this is just sick. It's akin to pedophilia, IMHO. So utterly damaging for that child.

Why are people talking about common sense gun control. These NRA/conservatives are not rational. There is no common ground with these people. We need to take their guns and ammo away. Otherwise you just argue about what an assault rifle is, how is it unfair to outlaw automatic grenade launchers and blaming teachers and children from not being armed. There is no negotiating with this types.

There is definitely something to creating a new anchor. Our anchor has been common sense gun legislation for a long time.

Maybe if we propose banning all the stupid guns, we can meet in the middle.

You do realize the other side has to be willing to compromise a little bit. They are not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Grooming gun lust in young kids like this is just sick. It's akin to pedophilia, IMHO. So utterly damaging for that child.

Why are people talking about common sense gun control. These NRA/conservatives are not rational. There is no common ground with these people. We need to take their guns and ammo away. Otherwise you just argue about what an assault rifle is, how is it unfair to outlaw automatic grenade launchers and blaming teachers and children from not being armed. There is no negotiating with this types.

There is definitely something to creating a new anchor. Our anchor has been common sense gun legislation for a long time.

Maybe if we propose banning all the stupid guns, we can meet in the middle.

You do realize the other side has to be willing to compromise a little bit. They are not.

This. All they understand is pure, undiluted power to do whatever you want. Democrats will just have to exercise raw power and assume no Republicans will meet them somewhere in the middle.

[Anonymous]

Democrats exercise raw power? You must not be familiar with Schumer or Pelosi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Grooming gun lust in young kids like this is just sick. It's akin to pedophilia, IMHO. So utterly damaging for that child.

Why are people talking about common sense gun control. These NRA/conservatives are not rational. There is no common ground with these people. We need to take their guns and ammo away. Otherwise you just argue about what an assault rifle is, how is it unfair to outlaw automatic grenade launchers and blaming teachers and children from not being armed. There is no negotiating with this types.

There is definitely something to creating a new anchor. Our anchor has been common sense gun legislation for a long time.

Maybe if we propose banning all the stupid guns, we can meet in the middle.

You do realize the other side has to be willing to compromise a little bit. They are not.

This. All they understand is pure, undiluted power to do whatever you want. Democrats will just have to exercise raw power and assume no Republicans will meet them somewhere in the middle.

+1

We need a ruthless McConnell sort who will fight for good instead of evil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are libs so against armed security in a government school building?

We don’t need more useless jobs programs that suck away money from education, health care, etc. when we can just ban AR-15s.

PP before - THE ARMED SECURITY DID NOTHING.

OMG, there was no armed security.

Why did they lie and say there was?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are libs so against armed security in a government school building?

We don’t need more useless jobs programs that suck away money from education, health care, etc. when we can just ban AR-15s.

PP before - THE ARMED SECURITY DID NOTHING.

OMG, there was no armed security.

Why did they lie and say there was?

I’d like to get facts from a neutral source. FBI?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Grooming gun lust in young kids like this is just sick. It's akin to pedophilia, IMHO. So utterly damaging for that child.

Why are people talking about common sense gun control. These NRA/conservatives are not rational. There is no common ground with these people. We need to take their guns and ammo away. Otherwise you just argue about what an assault rifle is, how is it unfair to outlaw automatic grenade launchers and blaming teachers and children from not being armed. There is no negotiating with this types.

There is definitely something to creating a new anchor. Our anchor has been common sense gun legislation for a long time.

Maybe if we propose banning all the stupid guns, we can meet in the middle.

You do realize the other side has to be willing to compromise a little bit. They are not.

This. All they understand is pure, undiluted power to do whatever you want. Democrats will just have to exercise raw power and assume no Republicans will meet them somewhere in the middle.

Yes democrats have to stop worrying about making republicans mad….they are always mad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are libs so against armed security in a government school building?

We don’t need more useless jobs programs that suck away money from education, health care, etc. when we can just ban AR-15s.

PP before - THE ARMED SECURITY DID NOTHING.

OMG, there was no armed security.

Why did they lie and say there was?

I’d like to get facts from a neutral source. FBI?

TBI is neutral and “investigating,” although their “investigation” seems to consist of “spouting whatever they hear from local police as gospel.”
Meanwhile…

[Anonymous]

Yeah, standing down has become popular, but mighty deadly. Perhaps rethink that nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, standing down has become popular, but mighty deadly. Perhaps rethink that nonsense.

Commander on the scene determined it was a "barricaded subject" situation and not an "active shooter" situation. This led to the stand down. In hindsight, it was the wrong call and contributed to additional loss of life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, standing down has become popular, but mighty deadly. Perhaps rethink that nonsense.

Standing down hasn’t been protocol since Columbine in 1999.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are libs so against armed security in a government school building?

We don’t need more useless jobs programs that suck away money from education, health care, etc. when we can just ban AR-15s.

PP before - THE ARMED SECURITY DID NOTHING.

OMG, there was no armed security.

Why did they lie and say there was?

I’d like to get facts from a neutral source. FBI?

Investigation press conference today confirmed no guard, armed or otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, standing down has become popular, but mighty deadly. Perhaps rethink that nonsense.

Commander on the scene determined it was a "barricaded subject" situation and not an "active shooter" situation. This led to the stand down. In hindsight, it was the wrong call and contributed to additional loss of life.

What time did he make that call?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are libs so against armed security in a government school building?

We don’t need more useless jobs programs that suck away money from education, health care, etc. when we can just ban AR-15s.

PP before - THE ARMED SECURITY DID NOTHING.

OMG, there was no armed security.

Why did they lie and say there was?

I’d like to get facts from a neutral source. FBI?

Investigation press conference today confirmed no guard, armed or otherwise.

Who confirmed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are libs so against armed security in a government school building?

We don’t need more useless jobs programs that suck away money from education, health care, etc. when we can just ban AR-15s.

PP before - THE ARMED SECURITY DID NOTHING.

OMG, there was no armed security.

Why did they lie and say there was?

I’d like to get facts from a neutral source. FBI?

Investigation press conference today confirmed no guard, armed or otherwise.

Who confirmed?

TX DPS Director Steve McCraw. Press conference is happening now.