ECNL moving to school year not calendar

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So now people are taking screenshots of iamsoccerdorks ridiculous posts to try and pass them off because everyone knows he's an ECNL shill and wont click on his X posts?

Sad...


I think most people know those specific stats are not set in stone and that those twitter pages are propaganda for ECNL, but it is easy to calculate the numbers of youth players vs. D1 players and see that the chances of going D1 in any sport are slim. That's the gist of the post.

I agree with you that most people think the iamsoccer guy is propaganda and it's weird that he focuses so much on youth girls soccer.


What if someone told you that the person behind the account is a coach of a prominent ECNL club and what they're doing is biased to protect their job?

You would believe it right? I just don't understand why that account or the other one needs to post with anonymity, but I would absolutely believe the rumors about who it is.
If the numbers are correct then the numbers are correct. Don't be a hater.


If*
Any proof that they are incorrect?


What about proof that they are? Stats are only as good as the numbers that are inputted into the equation. Incomplete and inaccurate numbers lead to incomplete, inaccurate, and misleading conclusions. You can draw some general conclusions, but don't be so naive to think those numbers are accurate.
Anonymous
GA's annual meeting is on June 18.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:GA's annual meeting is on June 18.

Anonymous
Roster Maximum: 24 player average per MLS Next team

Matchday Roster: 18 players per team

Over-age players: Max of 3


What happens to the six not rostered for games? Do they rotate weekends or do those 6 just not play?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Roster Maximum: 24 player average per MLS Next team

Matchday Roster: 18 players per team

Over-age players: Max of 3


What happens to the six not rostered for games? Do they rotate weekends or do those 6 just not play?

As kids get older they have more things going on in their lives + injuries. Most club run 22 and have a couple play up or down if theres too many that week
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So now people are taking screenshots of iamsoccerdorks ridiculous posts to try and pass them off because everyone knows he's an ECNL shill and wont click on his X posts?

Sad...


I think most people know those specific stats are not set in stone and that those twitter pages are propaganda for ECNL, but it is easy to calculate the numbers of youth players vs. D1 players and see that the chances of going D1 in any sport are slim. That's the gist of the post.

I agree with you that most people think the iamsoccer guy is propaganda and it's weird that he focuses so much on youth girls soccer.


What if someone told you that the person behind the account is a coach of a prominent ECNL club and what they're doing is biased to protect their job?

You would believe it right? I just don't understand why that account or the other one needs to post with anonymity, but I would absolutely believe the rumors about who it is.


On the boys side MLS next has the same kind of propaganda patsys posting on Instagram with charts and comments that are clearly biased for MLS Next and GA. NextGen is an obvious one. The thing is they make it waaay too obvious as to who is paying the bills. At least try to maintain a semblance of being unbiased. The moment you attempt to blend MLS and MLS Next into a single league vs putting the MLS academies at the top of the heap you reveal the bias. And then an attempt to plot ECNL alongside MLSN2 as comparable leagues (vs ECRL and MLSN2) makes them lose all credibility. Suggesting that MLS Next is ‘free’ and ECNL cost money (when only the academies are funded) is yet another propaganda piece. so it goes both ways unfortunately and you just have to decipher the fake news and take with a grain of salt…
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So now people are taking screenshots of iamsoccerdorks ridiculous posts to try and pass them off because everyone knows he's an ECNL shill and wont click on his X posts?

Sad...


I think most people know those specific stats are not set in stone and that those twitter pages are propaganda for ECNL, but it is easy to calculate the numbers of youth players vs. D1 players and see that the chances of going D1 in any sport are slim. That's the gist of the post.

I agree with you that most people think the iamsoccer guy is propaganda and it's weird that he focuses so much on youth girls soccer.


What if someone told you that the person behind the account is a coach of a prominent ECNL club and what they're doing is biased to protect their job?

You would believe it right? I just don't understand why that account or the other one needs to post with anonymity, but I would absolutely believe the rumors about who it is.


On the boys side MLS next has the same kind of propaganda patsys posting on Instagram with charts and comments that are clearly biased for MLS Next and GA. NextGen is an obvious one. The thing is they make it waaay too obvious as to who is paying the bills. At least try to maintain a semblance of being unbiased. The moment you attempt to blend MLS and MLS Next into a single league vs putting the MLS academies at the top of the heap you reveal the bias. And then an attempt to plot ECNL alongside MLSN2 as comparable leagues (vs ECRL and MLSN2) makes them lose all credibility. Suggesting that MLS Next is ‘free’ and ECNL cost money (when only the academies are funded) is yet another propaganda piece. so it goes both ways unfortunately and you just have to decipher the fake news and take with a grain of salt…


Been with both P2P MLSN and ECNL teams. 1/3 of the players of that P2P MLSN are from ECRL teams. Four players of the ECNL teams will go to the MLS Academy after the summer.
Anonymous
My son Plays for free in MLSN2

YMMV.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So now people are taking screenshots of iamsoccerdorks ridiculous posts to try and pass them off because everyone knows he's an ECNL shill and wont click on his X posts?

Sad...


I think most people know those specific stats are not set in stone and that those twitter pages are propaganda for ECNL, but it is easy to calculate the numbers of youth players vs. D1 players and see that the chances of going D1 in any sport are slim. That's the gist of the post.

I agree with you that most people think the iamsoccer guy is propaganda and it's weird that he focuses so much on youth girls soccer.


What if someone told you that the person behind the account is a coach of a prominent ECNL club and what they're doing is biased to protect their job?

You would believe it right? I just don't understand why that account or the other one needs to post with anonymity, but I would absolutely believe the rumors about who it is.


On the boys side MLS next has the same kind of propaganda patsys posting on Instagram with charts and comments that are clearly biased for MLS Next and GA. NextGen is an obvious one. The thing is they make it waaay too obvious as to who is paying the bills. At least try to maintain a semblance of being unbiased. The moment you attempt to blend MLS and MLS Next into a single league vs putting the MLS academies at the top of the heap you reveal the bias. And then an attempt to plot ECNL alongside MLSN2 as comparable leagues (vs ECRL and MLSN2) makes them lose all credibility. Suggesting that MLS Next is ‘free’ and ECNL cost money (when only the academies are funded) is yet another propaganda piece. so it goes both ways unfortunately and you just have to decipher the fake news and take with a grain of salt…


Been with both P2P MLSN and ECNL teams. 1/3 of the players of that P2P MLSN are from ECRL teams. Four players of the ECNL teams will go to the MLS Academy after the summer.


Just stop. You’re embarrassing yourself.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So now people are taking screenshots of iamsoccerdorks ridiculous posts to try and pass them off because everyone knows he's an ECNL shill and wont click on his X posts?

Sad...


I think most people know those specific stats are not set in stone and that those twitter pages are propaganda for ECNL, but it is easy to calculate the numbers of youth players vs. D1 players and see that the chances of going D1 in any sport are slim. That's the gist of the post.

I agree with you that most people think the iamsoccer guy is propaganda and it's weird that he focuses so much on youth girls soccer.


What if someone told you that the person behind the account is a coach of a prominent ECNL club and what they're doing is biased to protect their job?

You would believe it right? I just don't understand why that account or the other one needs to post with anonymity, but I would absolutely believe the rumors about who it is.


On the boys side MLS next has the same kind of propaganda patsys posting on Instagram with charts and comments that are clearly biased for MLS Next and GA. NextGen is an obvious one. The thing is they make it waaay too obvious as to who is paying the bills. At least try to maintain a semblance of being unbiased. The moment you attempt to blend MLS and MLS Next into a single league vs putting the MLS academies at the top of the heap you reveal the bias. And then an attempt to plot ECNL alongside MLSN2 as comparable leagues (vs ECRL and MLSN2) makes them lose all credibility. Suggesting that MLS Next is ‘free’ and ECNL cost money (when only the academies are funded) is yet another propaganda piece. so it goes both ways unfortunately and you just have to decipher the fake news and take with a grain of salt…


Been with both P2P MLSN and ECNL teams. 1/3 of the players of that P2P MLSN are from ECRL teams. Four players of the ECNL teams will go to the MLS Academy after the summer.


Just stop. You’re embarrassing yourself.


you are shameful
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:GA's annual meeting is on June 18.


The day before their national tournament and showcase in California?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:GA's annual meeting is on June 18.


The day before their national tournament and showcase in California?

Exactly, just another random guess by an ECNL hat.
Anonymous
These leagues really need to have a tournament against each other to decide who's the best once and for all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:GA's annual meeting is on June 18.


The day before their national tournament and showcase in California?


Correct , same as last year. You can look it up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:These leagues really need to have a tournament against each other to decide who's the best once and for all.


Legends showcase last week, City GA beat several ECNL teams.
Forum Index » Soccer
Go to: