The Cambridges News and Updates ( Prince William, Kate Middleton, George, Charlotte and Louis)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate hasn't been seen in public in two months now. Pregnant with #4?? She does always get super sick.

It’s a pandemic and she has unvaccinated kids.

She was just at a packed sports stadium for back-to-back Wimbledon and Euro Cup match with-and-without her unvaccinated child. More like she + William just got back from a long overseas vacation for weeks (his deep tan gives him away). Not ruling anything else out either but this is their vacation time.

I think this is all it is. They are usually “off” late July through early September.

They're usually photographed on their way to, or even at, Balmoral though. Plus first day of school photos with the kids, which they've announced they're not doing this year for some reason.

I think she's going to turn up pregnant with #4. Probably hoping for a sister for Charlotte.

They've been quieter about things like vacations and Balmoral for the whole year. Maybe because of Covid. Anyway they did go to Balmoral with the kids for a week in like August. As for the first day photos, I'm convinced they don't want the public to realize that all three kids are in full-time private school now. Louis started the same school as the older kids last year and there were no photos. Hard to explain what Kate (and William if we want to be equal opportunity) are doing with all their time if their kids are gone 6 hours out of the day.

And its not like the Royal Rota isn't begging for the opportunity for special photos - they've been publicly crying on twitter about going broke in the last two years.

Kate fan girls have excused their work shy ways because they have small kids. But if you have three kids at school and nanny Maria what is the excuse? I’ll be even more curious what they come up with when they ship George off to boarding school next year.

She can choose to work or not. As much or as little as she likes. It’s fun to see that drive you haters crazy.

No, she can’t choose to work or not. That’s literally her role in the family. She needs to increase the workload.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate hasn't been seen in public in two months now. Pregnant with #4?? She does always get super sick.

It’s a pandemic and she has unvaccinated kids.

She was just at a packed sports stadium for back-to-back Wimbledon and Euro Cup match with-and-without her unvaccinated child. More like she + William just got back from a long overseas vacation for weeks (his deep tan gives him away). Not ruling anything else out either but this is their vacation time.

I think this is all it is. They are usually “off” late July through early September.

They're usually photographed on their way to, or even at, Balmoral though. Plus first day of school photos with the kids, which they've announced they're not doing this year for some reason.

I think she's going to turn up pregnant with #4. Probably hoping for a sister for Charlotte.

They've been quieter about things like vacations and Balmoral for the whole year. Maybe because of Covid. Anyway they did go to Balmoral with the kids for a week in like August. As for the first day photos, I'm convinced they don't want the public to realize that all three kids are in full-time private school now. Louis started the same school as the older kids last year and there were no photos. Hard to explain what Kate (and William if we want to be equal opportunity) are doing with all their time if their kids are gone 6 hours out of the day.

And its not like the Royal Rota isn't begging for the opportunity for special photos - they've been publicly crying on twitter about going broke in the last two years.

Kate fan girls have excused their work shy ways because they have small kids. But if you have three kids at school and nanny Maria what is the excuse? I’ll be even more curious what they come up with when they ship George off to boarding school next year.

Exactly. The numbers at the end of the year aren’t going to lie. Everyone will see how little she works.

Oh wow. Do you think she will be put on a PIP? This is tragic.

Well that’s probably what the whole Rose Hanbury thing was. A PIP.

OMG it was. Kate even got a participation medal after the PIP became public knowledge. She went to the EEOC and said 'pay up or else!'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate hasn't been seen in public in two months now. Pregnant with #4?? She does always get super sick.

It’s a pandemic and she has unvaccinated kids.

She was just at a packed sports stadium for back-to-back Wimbledon and Euro Cup match with-and-without her unvaccinated child. More like she + William just got back from a long overseas vacation for weeks (his deep tan gives him away). Not ruling anything else out either but this is their vacation time.

I think this is all it is. They are usually “off” late July through early September.

They're usually photographed on their way to, or even at, Balmoral though. Plus first day of school photos with the kids, which they've announced they're not doing this year for some reason.

I think she's going to turn up pregnant with #4. Probably hoping for a sister for Charlotte.

They've been quieter about things like vacations and Balmoral for the whole year. Maybe because of Covid. Anyway they did go to Balmoral with the kids for a week in like August. As for the first day photos, I'm convinced they don't want the public to realize that all three kids are in full-time private school now. Louis started the same school as the older kids last year and there were no photos. Hard to explain what Kate (and William if we want to be equal opportunity) are doing with all their time if their kids are gone 6 hours out of the day.

And its not like the Royal Rota isn't begging for the opportunity for special photos - they've been publicly crying on twitter about going broke in the last two years.

Kate fan girls have excused their work shy ways because they have small kids. But if you have three kids at school and nanny Maria what is the excuse? I’ll be even more curious what they come up with when they ship George off to boarding school next year.

She can choose to work or not. As much or as little as she likes. It’s fun to see that drive you haters crazy.

No, she can’t choose to work or not. That’s literally her role in the family. She needs to increase the workload.

According to who, you? 😂

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate does seem really shy and like a nervous public speaker but it's strange that she hasn't gotten over that in over 10 years as a duchess. You can be trained out of that.

Yeah, Kate should rush to do the bidding of a bunch of Megan-stans on an anonymous forum.

This has nothing to do with Meghan. It has to do with her being the eventual queen of England and is not good at speaking in public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me it is irrelevant how much she works or how bad a speaker she is, but England has the largest percentage of people who are willing to describe themselves as republicans ever, and the younger generation is especially anti-royalist. Meanwhile, the commonwealth countries that pour money into Royal coffers are also increasingly hostile to the practice.

Kate (and really Will) doesn't have to work. Will can continue being unlikeable. Charles can continue being stiff and weird. The family can continue to protect Andrew. But the public willingness to be attached to the monarchy has never been weaker. It is their choice but it is not without consequences.

Also, the problem with the lack of work is that there is a lot of invisible work to maintain the monarchy. The Queen was an effective CEO: her workload was much more than what was visible. She managed a large operation with budgets, personnel management, contractual relationships, and more. I've seen very little evidence that Will has any capacity whatsoever in that regard. Charles, maybe, although he isn't an inspiring leader.

Personally I think that the chances of George ever being king are not high, unless the younger generation of the Royal family makes some massive changes.

Hilary Mantel basically said the same thing. She has extensively studied the history of the British royal family and her prediction is that it will last two more generations.

And then they can go back to just being boring crazy rich people with all their jewels and toys and no responsibilities. Sounds like a great gig if you can get it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate does seem really shy and like a nervous public speaker but it's strange that she hasn't gotten over that in over 10 years as a duchess. You can be trained out of that.

Yeah, Kate should rush to do the bidding of a bunch of Megan-stans on an anonymous forum.

This has nothing to do with Meghan. It has to do with her being the eventual queen of England and is not good at speaking in public.

I’m sure she’ll take your concerns to heart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate hasn't been seen in public in two months now. Pregnant with #4?? She does always get super sick.

It’s a pandemic and she has unvaccinated kids.

She was just at a packed sports stadium for back-to-back Wimbledon and Euro Cup match with-and-without her unvaccinated child. More like she + William just got back from a long overseas vacation for weeks (his deep tan gives him away). Not ruling anything else out either but this is their vacation time.

I think this is all it is. They are usually “off” late July through early September.

They're usually photographed on their way to, or even at, Balmoral though. Plus first day of school photos with the kids, which they've announced they're not doing this year for some reason.

I think she's going to turn up pregnant with #4. Probably hoping for a sister for Charlotte.

They've been quieter about things like vacations and Balmoral for the whole year. Maybe because of Covid. Anyway they did go to Balmoral with the kids for a week in like August. As for the first day photos, I'm convinced they don't want the public to realize that all three kids are in full-time private school now. Louis started the same school as the older kids last year and there were no photos. Hard to explain what Kate (and William if we want to be equal opportunity) are doing with all their time if their kids are gone 6 hours out of the day.

And its not like the Royal Rota isn't begging for the opportunity for special photos - they've been publicly crying on twitter about going broke in the last two years.

Kate fan girls have excused their work shy ways because they have small kids. But if you have three kids at school and nanny Maria what is the excuse? I’ll be even more curious what they come up with when they ship George off to boarding school next year.

She can choose to work or not. As much or as little as she likes. It’s fun to see that drive you haters crazy.

No, she can’t choose to work or not. That’s literally her role in the family. She needs to increase the workload.

According to who, you? 😂

The stats don’t lie. Look at the number of events by Royal member.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate hasn't been seen in public in two months now. Pregnant with #4?? She does always get super sick.

It’s a pandemic and she has unvaccinated kids.

She was just at a packed sports stadium for back-to-back Wimbledon and Euro Cup match with-and-without her unvaccinated child. More like she + William just got back from a long overseas vacation for weeks (his deep tan gives him away). Not ruling anything else out either but this is their vacation time.

I think this is all it is. They are usually “off” late July through early September.

They're usually photographed on their way to, or even at, Balmoral though. Plus first day of school photos with the kids, which they've announced they're not doing this year for some reason.

I think she's going to turn up pregnant with #4. Probably hoping for a sister for Charlotte.

They've been quieter about things like vacations and Balmoral for the whole year. Maybe because of Covid. Anyway they did go to Balmoral with the kids for a week in like August. As for the first day photos, I'm convinced they don't want the public to realize that all three kids are in full-time private school now. Louis started the same school as the older kids last year and there were no photos. Hard to explain what Kate (and William if we want to be equal opportunity) are doing with all their time if their kids are gone 6 hours out of the day.

And its not like the Royal Rota isn't begging for the opportunity for special photos - they've been publicly crying on twitter about going broke in the last two years.

Kate fan girls have excused their work shy ways because they have small kids. But if you have three kids at school and nanny Maria what is the excuse? I’ll be even more curious what they come up with when they ship George off to boarding school next year.

She can choose to work or not. As much or as little as she likes. It’s fun to see that drive you haters crazy.

No, she can’t choose to work or not. That’s literally her role in the family. She needs to increase the workload.

According to who, you? 😂

The stats don’t lie. Look at the number of events by Royal member.

Year after year this is talked about here. And nothing changes. it's as if your opinion and take on the matter is totally irrelevant to the powers that be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me it is irrelevant how much she works or how bad a speaker she is, but England has the largest percentage of people who are willing to describe themselves as republicans ever, and the younger generation is especially anti-royalist. Meanwhile, the commonwealth countries that pour money into Royal coffers are also increasingly hostile to the practice.

Kate (and really Will) doesn't have to work. Will can continue being unlikeable. Charles can continue being stiff and weird. The family can continue to protect Andrew. But the public willingness to be attached to the monarchy has never been weaker. It is their choice but it is not without consequences.

Also, the problem with the lack of work is that there is a lot of invisible work to maintain the monarchy. The Queen was an effective CEO: her workload was much more than what was visible. She managed a large operation with budgets, personnel management, contractual relationships, and more. I've seen very little evidence that Will has any capacity whatsoever in that regard. Charles, maybe, although he isn't an inspiring leader.

Personally I think that the chances of George ever being king are not high, unless the younger generation of the Royal family makes some massive changes.

Hilary Mantel basically said the same thing. She has extensively studied the history of the British royal family and her prediction is that it will last two more generations.

I remember her predicting something else monumental and it actually happened. I wish I could find it.

When the queen passes and it's time for all of the countries to certify Charles as king, they'll say yes. The US is a progressive country, the UK less so, and the rest of the world is much more conservative. That means they'll keep Charles, not leave.

[Anonymous]

I find it interesting that a bunch of well-off SAHMs are complaining about Kate not "working enough." Yet, the SAHMs are so busy managing cleaning, yard and other contractors, schlepping the kids, keeping the house up and exercising, that they can't imagine having a full-time job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me it is irrelevant how much she works or how bad a speaker she is, but England has the largest percentage of people who are willing to describe themselves as republicans ever, and the younger generation is especially anti-royalist. Meanwhile, the commonwealth countries that pour money into Royal coffers are also increasingly hostile to the practice.

Kate (and really Will) doesn't have to work. Will can continue being unlikeable. Charles can continue being stiff and weird. The family can continue to protect Andrew. But the public willingness to be attached to the monarchy has never been weaker. It is their choice but it is not without consequences.

Also, the problem with the lack of work is that there is a lot of invisible work to maintain the monarchy. The Queen was an effective CEO: her workload was much more than what was visible. She managed a large operation with budgets, personnel management, contractual relationships, and more. I've seen very little evidence that Will has any capacity whatsoever in that regard. Charles, maybe, although he isn't an inspiring leader.

Personally I think that the chances of George ever being king are not high, unless the younger generation of the Royal family makes some massive changes.

Hilary Mantel basically said the same thing. She has extensively studied the history of the British royal family and her prediction is that it will last two more generations.

I remember her predicting something else monumental and it actually happened. I wish I could find it.

When the queen passes and it's time for all of the countries to certify Charles as king, they'll say yes. The US is a progressive country, the UK less so, and the rest of the world is much more conservative. That means they'll keep Charles, not leave.

They already pre-certified Charles back in 2017. It’s not a question if they’ll accept him as monarch, it’s a question if they’ll get rid of the monarchy as head of state entirely in these countries outside of the UK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me it is irrelevant how much she works or how bad a speaker she is, but England has the largest percentage of people who are willing to describe themselves as republicans ever, and the younger generation is especially anti-royalist. Meanwhile, the commonwealth countries that pour money into Royal coffers are also increasingly hostile to the practice.

Kate (and really Will) doesn't have to work. Will can continue being unlikeable. Charles can continue being stiff and weird. The family can continue to protect Andrew. But the public willingness to be attached to the monarchy has never been weaker. It is their choice but it is not without consequences.

Also, the problem with the lack of work is that there is a lot of invisible work to maintain the monarchy. The Queen was an effective CEO: her workload was much more than what was visible. She managed a large operation with budgets, personnel management, contractual relationships, and more. I've seen very little evidence that Will has any capacity whatsoever in that regard. Charles, maybe, although he isn't an inspiring leader.

Personally I think that the chances of George ever being king are not high, unless the younger generation of the Royal family makes some massive changes.

Hilary Mantel basically said the same thing. She has extensively studied the history of the British royal family and her prediction is that it will last two more generations.

I remember her predicting something else monumental and it actually happened. I wish I could find it.

When the queen passes and it's time for all of the countries to certify Charles as king, they'll say yes. The US is a progressive country, the UK less so, and the rest of the world is much more conservative. That means they'll keep Charles, not leave.

They already pre-certified Charles back in 2017. It’s not a question if they’ll accept him as monarch, it’s a question if they’ll get rid of the monarchy as head of state entirely in these countries outside of the UK.

Indeed. Anti-imperialism is taken as the defacto morally right position now. Not so 25 years ago. Just give it time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate hasn't been seen in public in two months now. Pregnant with #4?? She does always get super sick.

It’s a pandemic and she has unvaccinated kids.

She was just at a packed sports stadium for back-to-back Wimbledon and Euro Cup match with-and-without her unvaccinated child. More like she + William just got back from a long overseas vacation for weeks (his deep tan gives him away). Not ruling anything else out either but this is their vacation time.

I think this is all it is. They are usually “off” late July through early September.

They're usually photographed on their way to, or even at, Balmoral though. Plus first day of school photos with the kids, which they've announced they're not doing this year for some reason.

I think she's going to turn up pregnant with #4. Probably hoping for a sister for Charlotte.

They've been quieter about things like vacations and Balmoral for the whole year. Maybe because of Covid. Anyway they did go to Balmoral with the kids for a week in like August. As for the first day photos, I'm convinced they don't want the public to realize that all three kids are in full-time private school now. Louis started the same school as the older kids last year and there were no photos. Hard to explain what Kate (and William if we want to be equal opportunity) are doing with all their time if their kids are gone 6 hours out of the day.

And its not like the Royal Rota isn't begging for the opportunity for special photos - they've been publicly crying on twitter about going broke in the last two years.

Kate fan girls have excused their work shy ways because they have small kids. But if you have three kids at school and nanny Maria what is the excuse? I’ll be even more curious what they come up with when they ship George off to boarding school next year.

She can choose to work or not. As much or as little as she likes. It’s fun to see that drive you haters crazy.

No, she can’t choose to work or not. That’s literally her role in the family. She needs to increase the workload.

According to who, you? 😂

DP. What do you think QEII means when she differentiates between working and non-working royal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me it is irrelevant how much she works or how bad a speaker she is, but England has the largest percentage of people who are willing to describe themselves as republicans ever, and the younger generation is especially anti-royalist. Meanwhile, the commonwealth countries that pour money into Royal coffers are also increasingly hostile to the practice.

Kate (and really Will) doesn't have to work. Will can continue being unlikeable. Charles can continue being stiff and weird. The family can continue to protect Andrew. But the public willingness to be attached to the monarchy has never been weaker. It is their choice but it is not without consequences.

Also, the problem with the lack of work is that there is a lot of invisible work to maintain the monarchy. The Queen was an effective CEO: her workload was much more than what was visible. She managed a large operation with budgets, personnel management, contractual relationships, and more. I've seen very little evidence that Will has any capacity whatsoever in that regard. Charles, maybe, although he isn't an inspiring leader.

Personally I think that the chances of George ever being king are not high, unless the younger generation of the Royal family makes some massive changes.

Hilary Mantel basically said the same thing. She has extensively studied the history of the British royal family and her prediction is that it will last two more generations.

I remember her predicting something else monumental and it actually happened. I wish I could find it.

When the queen passes and it's time for all of the countries to certify Charles as king, they'll say yes. The US is a progressive country, the UK less so, and the rest of the world is much more conservative. That means they'll keep Charles, not leave.

They already pre-certified Charles back in 2017. It’s not a question if they’ll accept him as monarch, it’s a question if they’ll get rid of the monarchy as head of state entirely in these countries outside of the UK.

Indeed. Anti-imperialism is taken as the defacto morally right position now. Not so 25 years ago. Just give it time.

Here is some more information about Barbados:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/barbados-harry-meghan-1.5952162

While they haven't voted yet about removing the monarchy, even if they do so in November they will remain the Commonwealth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find it interesting that a bunch of well-off SAHMs are complaining about Kate not "working enough." Yet, the SAHMs are so busy managing cleaning, yard and other contractors, schlepping the kids, keeping the house up and exercising, that they can't imagine having a full-time job.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.