Roe v Wade struck down

[Anonymous]

I have been thinking who will be our voice and who can fight Hand to hand with the. GOP and I thought of Hillary and I'm not alone.

https://thehill.com/opinion/3537754-juan-williams-hillary-clinton-can-rescue-democrats-in-the-midterms/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know what % of abortion are because of "Rape" or something bad that happens?

What's your definition of "bad"?

Rape - bad
Incest - bad
Abusive partner - bad
Birth control pills were tampered or did not work - bad
Condom broke - bad
Ectopic pregnancy - bad
Miscarriage - bad
Fetal abnormalities not consistent with life - bad

You're probably looking at 70%+ of abortions covered by that list of "bad" scenarios. This is why trying to legislate a list of carve-outs is a dumb idea. You can't possibly cover every scenario.

Rape - bad
Incest - bad
Abusive partner - should leave partner
Birth control pills were tampered or did not work - gift from god
Condom broke - gift from god

And if she has to share custody with the partner? Leave vulnerable children with him? Many, many women make the choice to stay in an abusive relationship to be there to protect the children.

Would you like some stories of women and/or children who died at the hands of a man who snapped when she left him? Hell, this woman even had a restraining order, but the police CHOSE not to enforce it. They can do that -- there is no duty to protect.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/545/748.html

The modified order gave respondent's husband the right to spend time with his three daughters (ages 10, 9, and 7) on alternate weekends, for two weeks during the summer, and, " 'upon reasonable notice,' " for a mid-week dinner visit " 'arranged by the parties' "; the modified order also allowed him to visit the home to collect the children for such "parenting time." Id., at 1097 (majority opinion).

According to the complaint, at about 5 or 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22, 1999, respondent's husband took the three daughters while they were playing outside the family home. No advance arrangements had been made for him to see the daughters that evening. When respondent noticed the children were missing, she suspected her husband had taken them. At about 7:30 p.m., she called the Castle Rock Police Department, which dispatched two officers. The complaint continues: "When [the officers] arrived ... , she showed them a copy of the TRO and requested that it be enforced and the three children be returned to her immediately. [The officers] stated that there was nothing they could do about the TRO and suggested that [respondent] call the Police Department again if the three children did not return home by 10:00 p.m." App. to Pet. for Cert. 126a.2

At approximately 8:30 p.m., respondent talked to her husband on his cellular telephone. He told her "he had the three children [at an] amusement park in Denver." Ibid. She called the police again and asked them to "have someone check for" her husband or his vehicle at the amusement park and "put out an [all points bulletin]" for her husband, but the officer with whom she spoke "refused to do so," again telling her to "wait until 10:00 p.m. and see if " her husband returned the girls. Id., at 126a-127a.

At approximately 10:10 p.m., respondent called the police and said her children were still missing, but she was now told to wait until midnight. She called at midnight and told the dispatcher her children were still missing. She went to her husband's apartment and, finding nobody there, called the police at 12:10 a.m.; she was told to wait for an officer to arrive. When none came, she went to the police station at 12:50 a.m. and submitted an incident report. The officer who took the report "made no reasonable effort to enforce the TRO or locate the three children. Instead, he went to dinner." Id., at 127a.

At approximately 3:20 a.m., respondent's husband arrived at the police station and opened fire with a semiautomatic handgun he had purchased earlier that evening. Police shot back, killing him. Inside the cab of his pickup truck, they found the bodies of all three daughters, whom he had already murdered. Ibid.

[Anonymous]

McConnell on women's rights. How I loathe this man.

https://youtu.be/mqxeixxFDvw

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have been thinking who will be our voice and who can fight Hand to hand with the. GOP and I thought of Hillary and I'm not alone.

https://thehill.com/opinion/3537754-juan-williams-hillary-clinton-can-rescue-democrats-in-the-midterms/

Really how stupid can you be? She is the reason we have Trump! Wake up! She had her chance. She lost. We need young people not more boomers.

[Anonymous]

How about Michelle Obama? Or a celebrity we'll just run themselves with confident people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How about Michelle Obama? Or a celebrity we'll just run themselves with confident people?

Stop with the political dynasties already!!

Can’t you see that is why we are in this position right now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about Michelle Obama? Or a celebrity we'll just run themselves with confident people?

Stop with the political dynasties already!!

Can’t you see that is why we are in this position right now?

I generally assume that people suggesting HRC, Mrs Obama or any celebrity are trolling. I think HRC would do great, actually, but she’s not interested. She won in 2016 and instead we got the great treason weasel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about Michelle Obama? Or a celebrity we'll just run themselves with confident people?

Stop with the political dynasties already!!

Can’t you see that is why we are in this position right now?

I generally assume that people suggesting HRC, Mrs Obama or any celebrity are trolling. I think HRC would do great, actually, but she’s not interested. She won in 2016 and instead we got the great treason weasel.

HRC did not win in 2016.

[Anonymous]

Several state governments banned state employee business travel to NC after their "bathroom bill." Will blue states do the same thing for women, now?

[Anonymous]

I personally would like to see Pete buttigieg.
I used to really like sherrard Brown.
I don't think a younger celebrity would be the worst thing in the world if they are able to surround themselves with people who know how to get work done and are loyal to the country

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about Michelle Obama? Or a celebrity we'll just run themselves with confident people?

Stop with the political dynasties already!!

Can’t you see that is why we are in this position right now?

I generally assume that people suggesting HRC, Mrs Obama or any celebrity are trolling. I think HRC would do great, actually, but she’s not interested. She won in 2016 and instead we got the great treason weasel.

HRC did not win in 2016.

Eh. HRC won.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about Michelle Obama? Or a celebrity we'll just run themselves with confident people?

Stop with the political dynasties already!!

Can’t you see that is why we are in this position right now?

I generally assume that people suggesting HRC, Mrs Obama or any celebrity are trolling. I think HRC would do great, actually, but she’s not interested. She won in 2016 and instead we got the great treason weasel.

HRC did not win in 2016.

Eh. HRC won.

Nope. Not by our country's long established process. If you dont like it, then work to get it changed. Otherwise, you're no better than Trump complaining that he really won reelection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Several state governments banned state employee business travel to NC after their "bathroom bill." Will blue states do the same thing for women, now?

I think Montgomery County has stopped business travel to any of the trigger ban states.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about Michelle Obama? Or a celebrity we'll just run themselves with confident people?

Stop with the political dynasties already!!

Can’t you see that is why we are in this position right now?

I generally assume that people suggesting HRC, Mrs Obama or any celebrity are trolling. I think HRC would do great, actually, but she’s not interested. She won in 2016 and instead we got the great treason weasel.

HRC did not win in 2016.

Eh. HRC won.

Nope. Not by our country's long established process. If you dont like it, then work to get it changed. Otherwise, you're no better than Trump complaining that he really won reelection.

Yes, we are still better ffs. Because we're not actually trying to prevent the orderly transition of power, and we're not encouraging violent insurrection. We're pointing out that the majority of voters wanted something different - VERY different - from what we got.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about Michelle Obama? Or a celebrity we'll just run themselves with confident people?

Stop with the political dynasties already!!

Can’t you see that is why we are in this position right now?

I generally assume that people suggesting HRC, Mrs Obama or any celebrity are trolling. I think HRC would do great, actually, but she’s not interested. She won in 2016 and instead we got the great treason weasel.

HRC did not win in 2016.

Eh. HRC won.

Nope. Not by our country's long established process. If you dont like it, then work to get it changed. Otherwise, you're no better than Trump complaining that he really won reelection.

Yes, we are still better ffs. Because we're not actually trying to prevent the orderly transition of power, and we're not encouraging violent insurrection. We're pointing out that the majority of voters wanted something different - VERY different - from what we got.

You clearly haven't read all the posts in this thread and others