Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 5

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That is fantastic.

Have you read this story? Cops confiscated this sign

Seriously? On what grounds?

I’m going to recreate this sign and put it everywhere.

Be sure to also put up a photo of Emett Till to remind people of the importance of due process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That is fantastic.

Have you read this story? Cops confiscated this sign

Seriously? On what grounds?

I’m going to recreate this sign and put it everywhere.

Be sure to also put up a photo of Emett Till to remind people of the importance of due process.

Did you just compare Till to BK?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That is fantastic.

Have you read this story? Cops confiscated this sign

Seriously? On what grounds?

I’m going to recreate this sign and put it everywhere.

Be sure to also put up a photo of Emett Till to remind people of the importance of due process.

Or, better yet, I’ll include Trump’s pussy-grabbing quote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know, when I've read over the hateful remarks and accusations that liberals level at conservatives on this forum, I've often thought.,,,"wow, if only voters could see Democrats for who they really are: vicious, nasty people who go on the attack against anyone with a different opinion."

Now, thanks to the actions of the Democrats in the Senate, along with the entitled, screaming banshees in the halls, the voters KNOW. See you at the polls next month.

Spare us your faux piety, you the party of Newt Gingrich, JUdge Arpiao, Mitch McConnell, Stephen Miller, Steve Bannon, Laura Ingraham, Rush Limbaugh, Roy Moore, Charlottesville, QAnon, Comet Pizza, Richard Spencer, and Donald Trump. You sold civil society for a SCOTUS seat and were happy to do so. Your president insulted Gold Star parents and made a war widow cry, he bragged about grabbing women’s pussies and just this past week he mocked a woman for telling her story of sexual assault and you said that’s fine as long as we get SCOTUS in return. Your president takes ideas from a man who says the Sandy Hook parents are crisis actors. And it doesn’t shock or disturb you. You have no moral authority to opine about hateful Democrats as long as you sit back and do nothing about the ugliness that inhabits the White House. You are morally bankrupt and we are coming to take our country back.

All of this.

This, this and this. +10000

X1 million

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh. Sad day when he is voted in. How infuriating is it to see the environment for my young daughters headed backwards in time.

I’m sure they’ll appreciate a country where a great woman took a brave stand for the presumption of innocence.

+ 1 million

No sorry my daughters have been groped by drunken frat boys and do not appreciate a country that elevates such dickish men to the highest level of power.

Brave woman? More like political pawn. What did McConnell say to her at lunch?

This “presumption of innocence” is so tired. This was not a trial. This was a job interview.

BK couldn’t get a job at Burger King after his performance last Thursday.

The presumption of innocence is not JUST for the courts. It is a principle on which our country was founded. It SHOULD permeate our society, but after this story, that is in doubt. Presumption of innocence should be applied in the work place, in journalism, and in life in general.
If you are not presuming innocence, you are presuming guilt. Based on no evidence.

You have hit on a concerning issue. And that is the increasing domination of work place "ethics" in our every day life.

Work places are not democracies. Many are overrun with an ethos of all is fair in love and war. We pretend they are meritocracies, but good people regularly are taken down by others who spread innuendo and sometimes outright lies. Anything that allows them to defeat their rival and climb the rungs of the organization.

Presumption of innocence and fairness have long ago left most work places if indeed they were ever present. Injured parties in the work place have to rely on the few fair senior people who have survived to defend them and to call out dirty tricks or navigate labyrinthine work places to help ensure a just outcome.

In the last couple of years at my work place I have had to jigger candidate selection to get a women who was being sexually harassed by her untouchable boss into a new reporting line. I have had to put together a coalition to defend a man unjustly accused by a woman of sexual harassment. I have been a lone voice defending a manager whose boss actively campaigned against her with senior management so she could cast her aside and replace her with a mini-clone.

I have had to make a private complaint to our EEO office about an AA who was on the verge of being denied a richly denied senior promotion. Right now I am having to help in the defense of another manager, an incredibly brilliant woman who is an ethnic minority, who is subject to a smear campaign--for a second time. She survived the first only through the intervention of the EEO office.

Enough already. I stand with Susan.

Why? Is Susan a victim here?

Of herself. Riding out her fourth term after campaigning on only serving for two, maximum.

PP is wholly delusional about which party is most supportive of workplace equities. I worked in EEO and employment law.

This isn't a party thing in everyday life. I know the party affiliations of some of the offenders in the cases I outlined above and can say some are Republicans and some are Democrats and the same is true of the targeted individuals. The point is that the widespread acceptance of dirty pool in the work place has begun to suffuse the national consciousness to the point that concepts like presumption of innocence and fairness are seen as quaint, old-fashioned, and outdated. Susan has reminded the nation they shouldn't be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Justice Elana Kagan yesterday on her fears about the future legitimacy of the Supreme Court

Yeah, she's concerned because the court has now swung to the conservative side. I didn't hear her complaining when it leaned liberal. But that's what the electorate wanted and.....someone famously once said.....elections have consequences.

No Justice including Thomas has EVER had a sniveling crybaby toddler shitfit during confirmation hearings revealing him or her to be a partisan.

Words mean things.

And NO Justice has EVER been falsely accused of participating in gang rapes, and having his wife threatened.

Falsely? How will we ever really know one way or another?

You can't prove a negative.

Did they ever find a record of the police report she said she filed?

[Anonymous]

The Democrats got outplayed at every level:

https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/05/opinions/gop-outplayed-dems-opinion-zelizer/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anyone who watched Schlitz Pitch-a-Fit Kavanaugh go partisan bananas on live television and still believes he should sit on the highest court in the land is dangerously delusional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who watched Schlitz Pitch-a-Fit Kavanaugh go partisan bananas on live television and still believes he should sit on the highest court in the land is dangerously delusional.

+1

I was watching with a group of lawyers, and every last one of us - Republican or Democrat - said, that's it, he's sunk. What an embarrassment.

[Anonymous]

So Ford has more evidence backing up her allegation. a friend who said she mentioned it a long time ago and emailed him kavanaugh's name before he was nominated to name him as her attacker

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Ford has more evidence backing up her allegation. a friend who said she mentioned it a long time ago and emailed him kavanaugh's name before he was nominated to name him as her attacker

That’s what SHE says. This “evidence” was never presented to the SJC nor presented with her testimony. I wonder why?

Meanwhile, the evidence she DID present exonerated Kavanaugh. Not one person she said was there had any knowledge of such a party. Not one. Not even her dear friend, who also said that she does not know Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Ford has more evidence backing up her allegation. a friend who said she mentioned it a long time ago and emailed him kavanaugh's name before he was nominated to name him as her attacker

That’s what SHE says. This “evidence” was never presented to the SJC nor presented with her testimony. I wonder why?

Meanwhile, the evidence she DID present exonerated Kavanaugh. Not one person she said was there had any knowledge of such a party. Not one. Not even her dear friend, who also said that she does not know Kavanaugh.

They have repeatedly contacted the FBI. The FBI never responded. That's why

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Ford has more evidence backing up her allegation. a friend who said she mentioned it a long time ago and emailed him kavanaugh's name before he was nominated to name him as her attacker

That’s what SHE says. This “evidence” was never presented to the SJC nor presented with her testimony. I wonder why?

Meanwhile, the evidence she DID present exonerated Kavanaugh. Not one person she said was there had any knowledge of such a party. Not one. Not even her dear friend, who also said that she does not know Kavanaugh.

They have repeatedly contacted the FBI. The FBI never responded. That's why

She had an opportunity to present this “evidence” during her testimony. Why didn’t she?

[Anonymous]

Rubio tweet:

Marco Rubio
?
Verified account

@marcorubio
Following Following @marcorubio
More
Marco Rubio Retweeted Sen. Susan Collins
Most will never know the full extent of the efforts to intimidate & threaten @SenatorCollins on the #Kavanaugh vote. I am not talking about political pressure or people screaming at her in an elevator. I am talking about vicious, vile & dangerous actions. She is legit.


This is just wrong. Period. This type of crap will make any decent human being think twice about running for political office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Ford has more evidence backing up her allegation. a friend who said she mentioned it a long time ago and emailed him kavanaugh's name before he was nominated to name him as her attacker

That’s what SHE says. This “evidence” was never presented to the SJC nor presented with her testimony. I wonder why?

Meanwhile, the evidence she DID present exonerated Kavanaugh. Not one person she said was there had any knowledge of such a party. Not one. Not even her dear friend, who also said that she does not know Kavanaugh.

They have repeatedly contacted the FBI. The FBI never responded. That's why

She had an opportunity to present this “evidence” during her testimony. Why didn’t she?

Maybe because it wasn't available at the time? You know that happens, right? Why would she withold it?