covid reported in area clubs?

[Anonymous]

McLean boys cancelled their full slate of academy games Sunday due to a potential COVID exposure in their program. I don’t know anything more than that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are not asking for kids names. We do want to know what teams so we can know whether or not we played against or at the same field as them before or after. Just want to be able to contact trace and monitor. Thats not to invasive of anyones privacy is it?

Yes it is invasive, It's also ridiculous.

Why on earth do you need to know if you played on the same field?

The odds of your kids catching a virus from the field beacuse somebody who later tested positive was on the field before your child are negligible.

The odds of your child catching a virus beacuse somebody who later tested positive was on the field after your child are zero.

Not the PP but I agree the team should be identified along with the time frame. Keeping the community safe is the most important thing.

Keep the community safe how exactly? The leading epidemioligists from Harvard, Stanford and Oxford universities have just called for an end to all social distancing and quarantining as not only unnecessary but actually counter-productive and likely to cause more fatalities than they prevent. The petition has been signed by over 12,000 scientists with more signing every hour. https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-covid-and-reason-11602026102?mod=opinion_lead_pos3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are not asking for kids names. We do want to know what teams so we can know whether or not we played against or at the same field as them before or after. Just want to be able to contact trace and monitor. Thats not to invasive of anyones privacy is it?

Yes it is invasive, It's also ridiculous.

Why on earth do you need to know if you played on the same field?

The odds of your kids catching a virus from the field beacuse somebody who later tested positive was on the field before your child are negligible.

The odds of your child catching a virus beacuse somebody who later tested positive was on the field after your child are zero.

Not the PP but I agree the team should be identified along with the time frame. Keeping the community safe is the most important thing.

Out of curiosity, do you think anybody positively tested should be publicly posted, along with name, address, work or school location? If not, why not?

No just as an employee shouldn't be identified but the place of employment should.

But then people presume everybody there is positive. So that is actually not useful information.

Not true thats how its reported regularly. X number of DC firefighters test positive but not who they were.
A player for Colorado Rapids but not a name
An employee at the local ABC #123 store but not their name.

So just say Potomac soccer club. Why isn’t that enough. And if it isn’t enough, why is a single employee at an ABC store enough? The question is why you need the information and how you intend to use it. That determines its utility. You still haven’t explained the use of knowing team vs club vs individual vs every team or club the team played.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are not asking for kids names. We do want to know what teams so we can know whether or not we played against or at the same field as them before or after. Just want to be able to contact trace and monitor. Thats not to invasive of anyones privacy is it?

Yes it is invasive, It's also ridiculous.

Why on earth do you need to know if you played on the same field?

The odds of your kids catching a virus from the field beacuse somebody who later tested positive was on the field before your child are negligible.

The odds of your child catching a virus beacuse somebody who later tested positive was on the field after your child are zero.

Not the PP but I agree the team should be identified along with the time frame. Keeping the community safe is the most important thing.

Out of curiosity, do you think anybody positively tested should be publicly posted, along with name, address, work or school location? If not, why not?

No just as an employee shouldn't be identified but the place of employment should.

But then people presume everybody there is positive. So that is actually not useful information.

Not true thats how its reported regularly. X number of DC firefighters test positive but not who they were.
A player for Colorado Rapids but not a name
An employee at the local ABC #123 store but not their name.

So just say Potomac soccer club. Why isn’t that enough. And if it isn’t enough, why is a single employee at an ABC store enough? The question is why you need the information and how you intend to use it. That determines its utility. You still haven’t explained the use of knowing team vs club vs individual vs every team or club the team played.

Because you would be given the information such as an employee at abc store#123 in McLean va tested positive if you were in the store on these dates 10\10 thru 10/13 . Please monitor for symptoms. We should be told a Potomac soccer player tested positive if you played at soccerplex field 4 on 10/11 between 9am and 2pm please monitor for symptoms. Why is that so invasive? Sounds responsible to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are not asking for kids names. We do want to know what teams so we can know whether or not we played against or at the same field as them before or after. Just want to be able to contact trace and monitor. Thats not to invasive of anyones privacy is it?

Yes it is invasive, It's also ridiculous.

Why on earth do you need to know if you played on the same field?

The odds of your kids catching a virus from the field beacuse somebody who later tested positive was on the field before your child are negligible.

The odds of your child catching a virus beacuse somebody who later tested positive was on the field after your child are zero.

Not the PP but I agree the team should be identified along with the time frame. Keeping the community safe is the most important thing.

Keep the community safe how exactly? The leading epidemioligists from Harvard, Stanford and Oxford universities have just called for an end to all social distancing and quarantining as not only unnecessary but actually counter-productive and likely to cause more fatalities than they prevent. The petition has been signed by over 12,000 scientists with more signing every hour. https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-covid-and-reason-11602026102?mod=opinion_lead_pos3

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are not asking for kids names. We do want to know what teams so we can know whether or not we played against or at the same field as them before or after. Just want to be able to contact trace and monitor. Thats not to invasive of anyones privacy is it?

Yes it is invasive, It's also ridiculous.

Why on earth do you need to know if you played on the same field?

The odds of your kids catching a virus from the field beacuse somebody who later tested positive was on the field before your child are negligible.

The odds of your child catching a virus beacuse somebody who later tested positive was on the field after your child are zero.

Not the PP but I agree the team should be identified along with the time frame. Keeping the community safe is the most important thing.

Out of curiosity, do you think anybody positively tested should be publicly posted, along with name, address, work or school location? If not, why not?

No just as an employee shouldn't be identified but the place of employment should.

But then people presume everybody there is positive. So that is actually not useful information.

Not true thats how its reported regularly. X number of DC firefighters test positive but not who they were.
A player for Colorado Rapids but not a name
An employee at the local ABC #123 store but not their name.

So just say Potomac soccer club. Why isn’t that enough. And if it isn’t enough, why is a single employee at an ABC store enough? The question is why you need the information and how you intend to use it. That determines its utility. You still haven’t explained the use of knowing team vs club vs individual vs every team or club the team played.

I was a previous poster who said that our team had their first positive. Every kid tested, every kid negative. Practice three times a week and games. Luckily there was a break in games so we didn’t have to notify another team - although I don’t know if that is protocol. Saying which team is enough. There are protocol put forward by the clubs and state/youth soccer associations.
The risk is low. Not minuscule but low.
There is also the economic side of travel soccer and if you want the kids to have sports when/if this is over then you have to let them return safely, now. These orgs cannot hold on for years without income. I don’t understand how the public expects business owners or non-profits to continue to operate while shut down for years. If you want something to return to - you have to maintain it. Safely. That is what most clubs are doing.

[Anonymous]

The Chinese - and President Trump - knew in February/March that the disease was aerosolized and mainly transmitted through the air indoors. Wish we had been told this early on so that our kids could have been at the swimming pool and playing sports all summer long.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are not asking for kids names. We do want to know what teams so we can know whether or not we played against or at the same field as them before or after. Just want to be able to contact trace and monitor. Thats not to invasive of anyones privacy is it?

Yes it is invasive, It's also ridiculous.

Why on earth do you need to know if you played on the same field?

The odds of your kids catching a virus from the field beacuse somebody who later tested positive was on the field before your child are negligible.

The odds of your child catching a virus beacuse somebody who later tested positive was on the field after your child are zero.

Not the PP but I agree the team should be identified along with the time frame. Keeping the community safe is the most important thing.

Out of curiosity, do you think anybody positively tested should be publicly posted, along with name, address, work or school location? If not, why not?

No just as an employee shouldn't be identified but the place of employment should.

But then people presume everybody there is positive. So that is actually not useful information.

Not true thats how its reported regularly. X number of DC firefighters test positive but not who they were.
A player for Colorado Rapids but not a name
An employee at the local ABC #123 store but not their name.

So just say Potomac soccer club. Why isn’t that enough. And if it isn’t enough, why is a single employee at an ABC store enough? The question is why you need the information and how you intend to use it. That determines its utility. You still haven’t explained the use of knowing team vs club vs individual vs every team or club the team played.

I was a previous poster who said that our team had their first positive. Every kid tested, every kid negative. Practice three times a week and games. Luckily there was a break in games so we didn’t have to notify another team - although I don’t know if that is protocol. Saying which team is enough. There are protocol put forward by the clubs and state/youth soccer associations.
The risk is low. Not minuscule but low.
There is also the economic side of travel soccer and if you want the kids to have sports when/if this is over then you have to let them return safely, now. These orgs cannot hold on for years without income. I don’t understand how the public expects business owners or non-profits to continue to operate while shut down for years. If you want something to return to - you have to maintain it. Safely. That is what most clubs are doing.

Most people urging lockdown and educlosure don’t care about the impact on others and don’t want to hear about it. The others think that writing a check solves that problem, when, in fact, it does not and will not. Any discussion of the collateral damage would lead to an evaluation of competing interests. It’s much easier to talk about who is masking and who doesn’t. That’s the level of political thinking in this area.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are not asking for kids names. We do want to know what teams so we can know whether or not we played against or at the same field as them before or after. Just want to be able to contact trace and monitor. Thats not to invasive of anyones privacy is it?

Yes it is invasive, It's also ridiculous.

Why on earth do you need to know if you played on the same field?

The odds of your kids catching a virus from the field beacuse somebody who later tested positive was on the field before your child are negligible.

The odds of your child catching a virus beacuse somebody who later tested positive was on the field after your child are zero.

Not the PP but I agree the team should be identified along with the time frame. Keeping the community safe is the most important thing.

Out of curiosity, do you think anybody positively tested should be publicly posted, along with name, address, work or school location? If not, why not?

No just as an employee shouldn't be identified but the place of employment should.

But then people presume everybody there is positive. So that is actually not useful information.

Not true thats how its reported regularly. X number of DC firefighters test positive but not who they were.
A player for Colorado Rapids but not a name
An employee at the local ABC #123 store but not their name.

So just say Potomac soccer club. Why isn’t that enough. And if it isn’t enough, why is a single employee at an ABC store enough? The question is why you need the information and how you intend to use it. That determines its utility. You still haven’t explained the use of knowing team vs club vs individual vs every team or club the team played.

I was a previous poster who said that our team had their first positive. Every kid tested, every kid negative. Practice three times a week and games. Luckily there was a break in games so we didn’t have to notify another team - although I don’t know if that is protocol. Saying which team is enough. There are protocol put forward by the clubs and state/youth soccer associations.
The risk is low. Not minuscule but low.
There is also the economic side of travel soccer and if you want the kids to have sports when/if this is over then you have to let them return safely, now. These orgs cannot hold on for years without income. I don’t understand how the public expects business owners or non-profits to continue to operate while shut down for years. If you want something to return to - you have to maintain it. Safely. That is what most clubs are doing.

Sounds like a fair and responsible plan. If everyone can operate this way we can still move forward as "normal" as possible until we can vaccinate and get control of this disease.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:McLean boys cancelled their full slate of academy games Sunday due to a potential COVID exposure in their program. I don’t know anything more than that.

False

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Chinese - and President Trump - knew in February/March that the disease was aerosolized and mainly transmitted through the air indoors. Wish we had been told this early on so that our kids could have been at the swimming pool and playing sports all summer long.

Wait - I thought we blamed trump for not doing enough rather than shutting too much down early on. No one knew how this disease was going to run through the public in Feb. I am all for opening safely but come on, stop placing blame on Trump (and for the record, I think he is an idiot too but refuse to blame him for crap like this).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McLean boys cancelled their full slate of academy games Sunday due to a potential COVID exposure in their program. I don’t know anything more than that.

False

100% true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McLean boys cancelled their full slate of academy games Sunday due to a potential COVID exposure in their program. I don’t know anything more than that.

False

Uh true. Stop

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McLean boys cancelled their full slate of academy games Sunday due to a potential COVID exposure in their program. I don’t know anything more than that.

False

Why do you say false?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Chinese - and President Trump - knew in February/March that the disease was aerosolized and mainly transmitted through the air indoors. Wish we had been told this early on so that our kids could have been at the swimming pool and playing sports all summer long.

Wait - I thought we blamed trump for not doing enough rather than shutting too much down early on. No one knew how this disease was going to run through the public in Feb. I am all for opening safely but come on, stop placing blame on Trump (and for the record, I think he is an idiot too but refuse to blame him for crap like this).

Agreed - it's ridiculous. But no more ridiculous than everything else done by the gang of organized criminals (both parties) who masquerade as our politicians these days.