The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I am the PP who posted the RFP and proposal documents. I agree that the community engagement sessions were set up with the thought that county wide boundary changes would come out of this plan quite quickly. Now the BOE has decided that this is just a Boundary Analysis to do "future" boundary studies. It doesn't matter though...they can still have the outcome they desire even though they are being less transparent now.

Yes, that's the conclusion a person will come to, when they start with the premise "MCPS/BoE are lying to us about everything and plan to force our kids into long-distance buses."

There's no evidence for that premise, of course. But why bother with evidence?

With the new lawsuit that was filed against the BOE, I see potential of the recent changes to Policy FAA being rescinded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I am the PP who posted the RFP and proposal documents. I agree that the community engagement sessions were set up with the thought that county wide boundary changes would come out of this plan quite quickly. Now the BOE has decided that this is just a Boundary Analysis to do "future" boundary studies. It doesn't matter though...they can still have the outcome they desire even though they are being less transparent now.

Yes, that's the conclusion a person will come to, when they start with the premise "MCPS/BoE are lying to us about everything and plan to force our kids into long-distance buses."

There's no evidence for that premise, of course. But why bother with evidence?

With the new lawsuit that was filed against the BOE, I see potential of the recent changes to Policy FAA being rescinded.

It's an appeal to MSDE, not a lawsuit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I am the PP who posted the RFP and proposal documents. I agree that the community engagement sessions were set up with the thought that county wide boundary changes would come out of this plan quite quickly. Now the BOE has decided that this is just a Boundary Analysis to do "future" boundary studies. It doesn't matter though...they can still have the outcome they desire even though they are being less transparent now.

Yes, that's the conclusion a person will come to, when they start with the premise "MCPS/BoE are lying to us about everything and plan to force our kids into long-distance buses."

There's no evidence for that premise, of course. But why bother with evidence?

With the new lawsuit that was filed against the BOE, I see potential of the recent changes to Policy FAA being rescinded.

It's an appeal to MSDE, not a lawsuit.

Nope, there is a lawsuit now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I am the PP who posted the RFP and proposal documents. I agree that the community engagement sessions were set up with the thought that county wide boundary changes would come out of this plan quite quickly. Now the BOE has decided that this is just a Boundary Analysis to do "future" boundary studies. It doesn't matter though...they can still have the outcome they desire even though they are being less transparent now.

Yes, that's the conclusion a person will come to, when they start with the premise "MCPS/BoE are lying to us about everything and plan to force our kids into long-distance buses."

There's no evidence for that premise, of course. But why bother with evidence?

With the new lawsuit that was filed against the BOE, I see potential of the recent changes to Policy FAA being rescinded.

It's an appeal to MSDE, not a lawsuit.

Nope, there is a lawsuit now.

Please share a link.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I am the PP who posted the RFP and proposal documents. I agree that the community engagement sessions were set up with the thought that county wide boundary changes would come out of this plan quite quickly. Now the BOE has decided that this is just a Boundary Analysis to do "future" boundary studies. It doesn't matter though...they can still have the outcome they desire even though they are being less transparent now.

Yes, that's the conclusion a person will come to, when they start with the premise "MCPS/BoE are lying to us about everything and plan to force our kids into long-distance buses."

There's no evidence for that premise, of course. But why bother with evidence?

With the new lawsuit that was filed against the BOE, I see potential of the recent changes to Policy FAA being rescinded.

It's an appeal to MSDE, not a lawsuit.

Nope, there is a lawsuit now.

Please share a link.

You would have to search for it yourself http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/

Put in filing date of 1/10/2020 to make it easy for yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I am the PP who posted the RFP and proposal documents. I agree that the community engagement sessions were set up with the thought that county wide boundary changes would come out of this plan quite quickly. Now the BOE has decided that this is just a Boundary Analysis to do "future" boundary studies. It doesn't matter though...they can still have the outcome they desire even though they are being less transparent now.

Yes, that's the conclusion a person will come to, when they start with the premise "MCPS/BoE are lying to us about everything and plan to force our kids into long-distance buses."

There's no evidence for that premise, of course. But why bother with evidence?

With the new lawsuit that was filed against the BOE, I see potential of the recent changes to Policy FAA being rescinded.

It's an appeal to MSDE, not a lawsuit.

Nope, there is a lawsuit now.

Please share a link.

You would have to search for it yourself http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/

Put in filing date of 1/10/2020 to make it easy for yourself.

It's the how-dare-you-send-my-kids-to-school-in-another-zip-code people. Yawn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I am the PP who posted the RFP and proposal documents. I agree that the community engagement sessions were set up with the thought that county wide boundary changes would come out of this plan quite quickly. Now the BOE has decided that this is just a Boundary Analysis to do "future" boundary studies. It doesn't matter though...they can still have the outcome they desire even though they are being less transparent now.

Yes, that's the conclusion a person will come to, when they start with the premise "MCPS/BoE are lying to us about everything and plan to force our kids into long-distance buses."

There's no evidence for that premise, of course. But why bother with evidence?

With the new lawsuit that was filed against the BOE, I see potential of the recent changes to Policy FAA being rescinded.

It's an appeal to MSDE, not a lawsuit.

Nope, there is a lawsuit now.

Please share a link.

You would have to search for it yourself http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/

Put in filing date of 1/10/2020 to make it easy for yourself.

It's the how-dare-you-send-my-kids-to-school-in-another-zip-code people. Yawn.

One of the plaintiffs moved to their residence last year.

The other one actually lives closer to Neelsville MS and Seneca Valley HS than to Rocky Hill MS and Clarksburg HS (respectively).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I am the PP who posted the RFP and proposal documents. I agree that the community engagement sessions were set up with the thought that county wide boundary changes would come out of this plan quite quickly. Now the BOE has decided that this is just a Boundary Analysis to do "future" boundary studies. It doesn't matter though...they can still have the outcome they desire even though they are being less transparent now.

Yes, that's the conclusion a person will come to, when they start with the premise "MCPS/BoE are lying to us about everything and plan to force our kids into long-distance buses."

There's no evidence for that premise, of course. But why bother with evidence?

With the new lawsuit that was filed against the BOE, I see potential of the recent changes to Policy FAA being rescinded.

It's an appeal to MSDE, not a lawsuit.

Nope, there is a lawsuit now.

Please share a link.

You would have to search for it yourself http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/

Put in filing date of 1/10/2020 to make it easy for yourself.

Case Number: 477603V. Easier for everyone to search

[Anonymous]

More about the lawsuit.

https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-beat/schools/residents-claim-violation-of-open-meetings-law-in-legal-challenge-of-boundary-changes/?fbclid=IwAR03pHj_ydjEsNUs_aXnCvRQ9jdxLp6_F8prM940i_7nv3Q3UNqP_oUw5Z4#close

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More about the lawsuit.

https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-beat/schools/residents-claim-violation-of-open-meetings-law-in-legal-challenge-of-boundary-changes/?fbclid=IwAR03pHj_ydjEsNUs_aXnCvRQ9jdxLp6_F8prM940i_7nv3Q3UNqP_oUw5Z4#close

So basically the plaintiffs believe they're entitled to segregated schools because they pay more taxes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More about the lawsuit.

https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-beat/schools/residents-claim-violation-of-open-meetings-law-in-legal-challenge-of-boundary-changes/?fbclid=IwAR03pHj_ydjEsNUs_aXnCvRQ9jdxLp6_F8prM940i_7nv3Q3UNqP_oUw5Z4#close

So basically the plaintiffs believe they're entitled to segregated schools because they pay more taxes?

Did you read the article?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More about the lawsuit.

https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-beat/schools/residents-claim-violation-of-open-meetings-law-in-legal-challenge-of-boundary-changes/?fbclid=IwAR03pHj_ydjEsNUs_aXnCvRQ9jdxLp6_F8prM940i_7nv3Q3UNqP_oUw5Z4#close

So basically the plaintiffs believe they're entitled to segregated schools because they pay more taxes?

Nope. Did you read the article?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More about the lawsuit.

https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-beat/schools/residents-claim-violation-of-open-meetings-law-in-legal-challenge-of-boundary-changes/?fbclid=IwAR03pHj_ydjEsNUs_aXnCvRQ9jdxLp6_F8prM940i_7nv3Q3UNqP_oUw5Z4#close

The lawsuit is about a violation of the Open Meetings Act?!

Why don't they just go dig a hole in their respective back yards and throw money down it? It would be just as productive.

[Anonymous]

the lawsuit is about getting the word ESPECIALLY removed from the FAA so that kids aren't used as pawns in a social engineering experiment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the lawsuit is about getting the word ESPECIALLY removed from the FAA so that kids aren't used as pawns in a social engineering experiment.

No, it's not. I guess you didn't read the Bethesda Beat piece.