Why is there so much hate here directed at Gabbard? I just can't figure it out ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, I hate Tulsi because I think she is a tool of the Russians and we already have one of those in the White House.

The more lost in this Russia fantasy the Democrats are, the more likely Trump is to be re-elected. Are you a pro-Trump false flag?

You're wrong. Facebook has already caught Russian trolls trying to meddle with the 2020 election. Are you a Russian troll yourself? At the very least, you're acting like a Russian asset.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/21/tech/russia-instagram-accounts-2020-election/index.html

The Senate Intelligence Committee produced an exhaustive report and the key finding was that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. We now know they are doing the same thing in 2020 with pretty much the same strategy- a troll army of social media influencers posting to drive down the support of mainstream Democratic candidates and trolls posting as either right wing and out of the mainstream left wing voters. You are a fool if you fall for this a second time. Gabbard is especially vulnerable to gaining Russian troll support because her views align very closely to Putin, Assad etc. She is not a Democrat.
The fact that she voted against the Magnitsky Act says a lot about her. Hiring someone like Chris Cooper (a Russian lobbyist who actively works against pro democracy forces in Russia) is also troubling. Gabbard disses America but she hasn’t met a dictator/autocrat she doesn’t like.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/08/intelligence-committee-russia-trump-report-040736

I know Jeff insists we don’t have trolls on dcum but when you have so many threads about a candidate polling at around 1% who got onto the debate stage because of a support campaign organized by the Daily Stormer you have to wonder

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, I hate Tulsi because I think she is a tool of the Russians and we already have one of those in the White House.

The more lost in this Russia fantasy the Democrats are, the more likely Trump is to be re-elected. Are you a pro-Trump false flag?

You're wrong. Facebook has already caught Russian trolls trying to meddle with the 2020 election. Are you a Russian troll yourself? At the very least, you're acting like a Russian asset.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/21/tech/russia-instagram-accounts-2020-election/index.html

The Senate Intelligence Committee produced an exhaustive report and the key finding was that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. We now know they are doing the same thing in 2020 with pretty much the same strategy- a troll army of social media influencers posting to drive down the support of mainstream Democratic candidates and trolls posting as either right wing and out of the mainstream left wing voters. You are a fool if you fall for this a second time. Gabbard is especially vulnerable to gaining Russian troll support because her views align very closely to Putin, Assad etc. She is not a Democrat.
The fact that she voted against the Magnitsky Act says a lot about her. Hiring someone like Chris Cooper (a Russian lobbyist who actively works against pro democracy forces in Russia) is also troubling. Gabbard disses America but she hasn’t met a dictator/autocrat she doesn’t like.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/08/intelligence-committee-russia-trump-report-040736

I know Jeff insists we don’t have trolls on dcum but when you have so many threads about a candidate polling at around 1% who got onto the debate stage because of a support campaign organized by the Daily Stormer you have to wonder

I love how ‘Russian Interference’ truthers never even try to put putative meddling into context. If you would admit it’s at most .000001% of Facebook ad spending and maybe .0001% of political ad spending on Facebook, that silliness of your panic would be obvious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, I hate Tulsi because I think she is a tool of the Russians and we already have one of those in the White House.

The more lost in this Russia fantasy the Democrats are, the more likely Trump is to be re-elected. Are you a pro-Trump false flag?

You're wrong. Facebook has already caught Russian trolls trying to meddle with the 2020 election. Are you a Russian troll yourself? At the very least, you're acting like a Russian asset.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/21/tech/russia-instagram-accounts-2020-election/index.html

The Senate Intelligence Committee produced an exhaustive report and the key finding was that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. We now know they are doing the same thing in 2020 with pretty much the same strategy- a troll army of social media influencers posting to drive down the support of mainstream Democratic candidates and trolls posting as either right wing and out of the mainstream left wing voters. You are a fool if you fall for this a second time. Gabbard is especially vulnerable to gaining Russian troll support because her views align very closely to Putin, Assad etc. She is not a Democrat.
The fact that she voted against the Magnitsky Act says a lot about her. Hiring someone like Chris Cooper (a Russian lobbyist who actively works against pro democracy forces in Russia) is also troubling. Gabbard disses America but she hasn’t met a dictator/autocrat she doesn’t like.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/08/intelligence-committee-russia-trump-report-040736

I know Jeff insists we don’t have trolls on dcum but when you have so many threads about a candidate polling at around 1% who got onto the debate stage because of a support campaign organized by the Daily Stormer you have to wonder

I love how ‘Russian Interference’ truthers never even try to put putative meddling into context. If you would admit it’s at most .000001% of Facebook ad spending and maybe .0001% of political ad spending on Facebook, that silliness of your panic would be obvious.

I love how 'Russian Interference' deniers try to move the goalposts on the amount of foreign interference in our elections, going from "none" to "just a little", while still dismissing those who recognize it as a threat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, I hate Tulsi because I think she is a tool of the Russians and we already have one of those in the White House.

The more lost in this Russia fantasy the Democrats are, the more likely Trump is to be re-elected. Are you a pro-Trump false flag?

You're wrong. Facebook has already caught Russian trolls trying to meddle with the 2020 election. Are you a Russian troll yourself? At the very least, you're acting like a Russian asset.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/21/tech/russia-instagram-accounts-2020-election/index.html

The Senate Intelligence Committee produced an exhaustive report and the key finding was that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. We now know they are doing the same thing in 2020 with pretty much the same strategy- a troll army of social media influencers posting to drive down the support of mainstream Democratic candidates and trolls posting as either right wing and out of the mainstream left wing voters. You are a fool if you fall for this a second time. Gabbard is especially vulnerable to gaining Russian troll support because her views align very closely to Putin, Assad etc. She is not a Democrat.
The fact that she voted against the Magnitsky Act says a lot about her. Hiring someone like Chris Cooper (a Russian lobbyist who actively works against pro democracy forces in Russia) is also troubling. Gabbard disses America but she hasn’t met a dictator/autocrat she doesn’t like.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/08/intelligence-committee-russia-trump-report-040736

I know Jeff insists we don’t have trolls on dcum but when you have so many threads about a candidate polling at around 1% who got onto the debate stage because of a support campaign organized by the Daily Stormer you have to wonder

I love how ‘Russian Interference’ truthers never even try to put putative meddling into context. If you would admit it’s at most .000001% of Facebook ad spending and maybe .0001% of political ad spending on Facebook, that silliness of your panic would be obvious.

I love how 'Russian Interference' deniers try to move the goalposts on the amount of foreign interference in our elections, going from "none" to "just a little", while still dismissing those who recognize it as a threat.

If you’ve been around the political class as long as I have, you know the word ‘threat’ means there’s a cynical interest looking to suck on the Federal teat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, I hate Tulsi because I think she is a tool of the Russians and we already have one of those in the White House.

The more lost in this Russia fantasy the Democrats are, the more likely Trump is to be re-elected. Are you a pro-Trump false flag?

You're wrong. Facebook has already caught Russian trolls trying to meddle with the 2020 election. Are you a Russian troll yourself? At the very least, you're acting like a Russian asset.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/21/tech/russia-instagram-accounts-2020-election/index.html

The Senate Intelligence Committee produced an exhaustive report and the key finding was that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. We now know they are doing the same thing in 2020 with pretty much the same strategy- a troll army of social media influencers posting to drive down the support of mainstream Democratic candidates and trolls posting as either right wing and out of the mainstream left wing voters. You are a fool if you fall for this a second time. Gabbard is especially vulnerable to gaining Russian troll support because her views align very closely to Putin, Assad etc. She is not a Democrat.
The fact that she voted against the Magnitsky Act says a lot about her. Hiring someone like Chris Cooper (a Russian lobbyist who actively works against pro democracy forces in Russia) is also troubling. Gabbard disses America but she hasn’t met a dictator/autocrat she doesn’t like.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/08/intelligence-committee-russia-trump-report-040736

I know Jeff insists we don’t have trolls on dcum but when you have so many threads about a candidate polling at around 1% who got onto the debate stage because of a support campaign organized by the Daily Stormer you have to wonder

I love how ‘Russian Interference’ truthers never even try to put putative meddling into context. If you would admit it’s at most .000001% of Facebook ad spending and maybe .0001% of political ad spending on Facebook, that silliness of your panic would be obvious.

Russian propaganda was seen by more than 126m American Facebook users in the 2016 election campaign:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/30/facebook-russia-fake-accounts-126-million

This is equivalent to nearly 40% of the US population.

Moral of the story: a little money goes a long way when you buy propaganda on Facebook to sway elections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, I hate Tulsi because I think she is a tool of the Russians and we already have one of those in the White House.

The more lost in this Russia fantasy the Democrats are, the more likely Trump is to be re-elected. Are you a pro-Trump false flag?

You're wrong. Facebook has already caught Russian trolls trying to meddle with the 2020 election. Are you a Russian troll yourself? At the very least, you're acting like a Russian asset.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/21/tech/russia-instagram-accounts-2020-election/index.html

The Senate Intelligence Committee produced an exhaustive report and the key finding was that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. We now know they are doing the same thing in 2020 with pretty much the same strategy- a troll army of social media influencers posting to drive down the support of mainstream Democratic candidates and trolls posting as either right wing and out of the mainstream left wing voters. You are a fool if you fall for this a second time. Gabbard is especially vulnerable to gaining Russian troll support because her views align very closely to Putin, Assad etc. She is not a Democrat.
The fact that she voted against the Magnitsky Act says a lot about her. Hiring someone like Chris Cooper (a Russian lobbyist who actively works against pro democracy forces in Russia) is also troubling. Gabbard disses America but she hasn’t met a dictator/autocrat she doesn’t like.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/08/intelligence-committee-russia-trump-report-040736

I know Jeff insists we don’t have trolls on dcum but when you have so many threads about a candidate polling at around 1% who got onto the debate stage because of a support campaign organized by the Daily Stormer you have to wonder

I love how ‘Russian Interference’ truthers never even try to put putative meddling into context. If you would admit it’s at most .000001% of Facebook ad spending and maybe .0001% of political ad spending on Facebook, that silliness of your panic would be obvious.

Russian propaganda was seen by more than 126m American Facebook users in the 2016 election campaign:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/30/facebook-russia-fake-accounts-126-million

This is equivalent to nearly 40% of the US population.

Moral of the story: a little money goes a long way when you buy propaganda on Facebook to sway elections.

I’d try to sell you a bridge, but you’ve obviously already spent all your money buying this one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, I hate Tulsi because I think she is a tool of the Russians and we already have one of those in the White House.

The more lost in this Russia fantasy the Democrats are, the more likely Trump is to be re-elected. Are you a pro-Trump false flag?

You're wrong. Facebook has already caught Russian trolls trying to meddle with the 2020 election. Are you a Russian troll yourself? At the very least, you're acting like a Russian asset.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/21/tech/russia-instagram-accounts-2020-election/index.html

The Senate Intelligence Committee produced an exhaustive report and the key finding was that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. We now know they are doing the same thing in 2020 with pretty much the same strategy- a troll army of social media influencers posting to drive down the support of mainstream Democratic candidates and trolls posting as either right wing and out of the mainstream left wing voters. You are a fool if you fall for this a second time. Gabbard is especially vulnerable to gaining Russian troll support because her views align very closely to Putin, Assad etc. She is not a Democrat.
The fact that she voted against the Magnitsky Act says a lot about her. Hiring someone like Chris Cooper (a Russian lobbyist who actively works against pro democracy forces in Russia) is also troubling. Gabbard disses America but she hasn’t met a dictator/autocrat she doesn’t like.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/08/intelligence-committee-russia-trump-report-040736

I know Jeff insists we don’t have trolls on dcum but when you have so many threads about a candidate polling at around 1% who got onto the debate stage because of a support campaign organized by the Daily Stormer you have to wonder

I love how ‘Russian Interference’ truthers never even try to put putative meddling into context. If you would admit it’s at most .000001% of Facebook ad spending and maybe .0001% of political ad spending on Facebook, that silliness of your panic would be obvious.

Russian propaganda was seen by more than 126m American Facebook users in the 2016 election campaign:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/30/facebook-russia-fake-accounts-126-million

This is equivalent to nearly 40% of the US population.

Moral of the story: a little money goes a long way when you buy propaganda on Facebook to sway elections.

I’d try to sell you a bridge, but you’ve obviously already spent all your money buying this one.

You're trying way too hard to downplay this.

[Anonymous]

I wonder why noone here seems to be aware of (or brought up) these:

https://caravanmagazine.in/politics/american-sangh-affair-tulsi-gabbard
https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/tulsi-gabbard-unites-bloodstained-modi-genocidal-assad-putin-and-the-u-s-far-right-1.6870890
https://theintercept.com/2019/01/05/tulsi-gabbard-2020-hindu-nationalist-modi/

The first one is a carefully researched article, documenting the peculiar trajectory of this lady, fueled at least to some extent by a Hindu right-wing organization of the worst kind (brace yourselves now for those trolls to land on this thread, if they are not here already- they are vicious, relentless, populous, and dumb). I have no idea how the dots - Assad, Russians, Modi, Hindu right-wing - connect, or whether they connect at all. The most benign explanation is that they do not connect, and that Gabbard just has a set of world views and contrarian policy positions that endear her to the extremes of the right and left, who are actually much closer to each other ideologically than they would admit.

[Anonymous]

Simple - for me at least. Trump is Moscow’s candidate of choice. And that’s a BIG strike against him (among many others). If Gabbard is Moscow’s future preference, then that’s a BIG strike against her too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Simple - for me at least. Trump is Moscow’s candidate of choice. And that’s a BIG strike against him (among many others). If Gabbard is Moscow’s future preference, then that’s a BIG strike against her too.

+1

I support the US, not Russia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Simple - for me at least. Trump is Moscow’s candidate of choice. And that’s a BIG strike against him (among many others). If Gabbard is Moscow’s future preference, then that’s a BIG strike against her too.

Your preferences are rooted in fantasies.

Tulsi is turning over a new leaf in politics: that terrifying to the entrenched interests that have wreaked such havoc on America and the world.

[Anonymous]

Seriously, noone gives her a second thought except the trolls. Am amazed at the number of threads sbout her. But trolls gotta troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seriously, noone gives her a second thought except the trolls. Am amazed at the number of threads sbout her. But trolls gotta troll.

You just failed at politics, bub.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wonder why noone here seems to be aware of (or brought up) these:

https://caravanmagazine.in/politics/american-sangh-affair-tulsi-gabbard
https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/tulsi-gabbard-unites-bloodstained-modi-genocidal-assad-putin-and-the-u-s-far-right-1.6870890
https://theintercept.com/2019/01/05/tulsi-gabbard-2020-hindu-nationalist-modi/

The first one is a carefully researched article, documenting the peculiar trajectory of this lady, fueled at least to some extent by a Hindu right-wing organization of the worst kind (brace yourselves now for those trolls to land on this thread, if they are not here already- they are vicious, relentless, populous, and dumb). I have no idea how the dots - Assad, Russians, Modi, Hindu right-wing - connect, or whether they connect at all. The most benign explanation is that they do not connect, and that Gabbard just has a set of world views and contrarian policy positions that endear her to the extremes of the right and left, who are actually much closer to each other ideologically than they would admit.

Ridiculous. The ‘carefully’ researched article is written by a Pieter Friedrich. A well know Hinduphobe that writes anti Hindu hate speech for his social media posts all the time. I wonder if it would be okay to call out any other politicians based on the religion of donors. He’s also been investigated by the a United States for trying to purchase semi and automatic weapons to support Khalistani terrorists.

Caravan refused to publish any rebuttal to the racist article and there have been several. Here’s a couple:

https://medium.com/@tjmcnulty_79436/debunking-pieter-friedrichs-tulsi-narrative-1085649b2810

https://www.hafsite.org/hindu-amerrican-foundation-writes-caravan-magazine-article-targeting-hindu-american-political-donors

No need to even go any further as I’m sure your other links are just as slanted. You clearly hate Hindus and need a way to link Tulsi to propaganda to smear her for being Hindu. Say all you want about her being the Russian favorite or the whatever, but trying to add in anti-Hindu garbage to fit your discriminatory agenda will only backfire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder why noone here seems to be aware of (or brought up) these:

https://caravanmagazine.in/politics/american-sangh-affair-tulsi-gabbard
https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/tulsi-gabbard-unites-bloodstained-modi-genocidal-assad-putin-and-the-u-s-far-right-1.6870890
https://theintercept.com/2019/01/05/tulsi-gabbard-2020-hindu-nationalist-modi/

The first one is a carefully researched article, documenting the peculiar trajectory of this lady, fueled at least to some extent by a Hindu right-wing organization of the worst kind (brace yourselves now for those trolls to land on this thread, if they are not here already- they are vicious, relentless, populous, and dumb). I have no idea how the dots - Assad, Russians, Modi, Hindu right-wing - connect, or whether they connect at all. The most benign explanation is that they do not connect, and that Gabbard just has a set of world views and contrarian policy positions that endear her to the extremes of the right and left, who are actually much closer to each other ideologically than they would admit.

Ridiculous. The ‘carefully’ researched article is written by a Pieter Friedrich. A well know Hinduphobe that writes anti Hindu hate speech for his social media posts all the time. I wonder if it would be okay to call out any other politicians based on the religion of donors. He’s also been investigated by the a United States for trying to purchase semi and automatic weapons to support Khalistani terrorists.

Caravan refused to publish any rebuttal to the racist article and there have been several. Here’s a couple:

https://medium.com/@tjmcnulty_79436/debunking-pieter-friedrichs-tulsi-narrative-1085649b2810

https://www.hafsite.org/hindu-amerrican-foundation-writes-caravan-magazine-article-targeting-hindu-american-political-donors

No need to even go any further as I’m sure your other links are just as slanted. You clearly hate Hindus and need a way to link Tulsi to propaganda to smear her for being Hindu. Say all you want about her being the Russian favorite or the whatever, but trying to add in anti-Hindu garbage to fit your discriminatory agenda will only backfire.

Being anti-RSS - the self-appointed guardians of their version of, hard-right, reactionary Hinduism - is not synonymous with being "anti-Hindu"; any more than being anti-right wing evangelism is synonymous with being anti-Christian, or anti-Wahabism is synonymous with anti-Islam. But that's what you guys regurgitating RSS talking points do - attack the messenger as being "anti-Hindu", "anti-India", and most ironically (for an organization whose founders expressed admiration for Hitler), "racist". The second link you posted is a screed published by a RSS outlet attacking the author of the Caravan piece, not a factual rebuttal of the article itself. The first one is slightly better. I will leave it to the readers to judge which of the articles on both sides of the story are more credible. The other links I posted, including one from the Haaretz, that you have conveniently ignored are pretty convincing. I will leave it to your RSS friends to find reasons to attack the authors of those pieces as well.

I am still trying to understand why a "progressive" democrat supposedly espousing left-wing views would be supported by RSS. Even an RSS diehard will be hard-pressed to argue that it is a progressive organization. Five minutes of google search on the writings of Hedgewar, Savarkar and others will demonstrate that. And the latest (2018) report by the US Commission for International Religious Freedom, undoubtedly staffed by diehard "Hindu-haters" as well (sarcasm alert), seems to suggest that the modern RSS has not strayed far from the ideology of their founders. This article summarizes it well (you are welcome to read the original report also).
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/religious-freedom-conditions-continued-downward-trend-in-india-in-2017-uscirf/articleshow/63943718.cms

A sample from the above article: ""Conditions for religious minorities have deteriorated over the last decade due to a multifaceted campaign by Hindu-nationalist groups like Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sang (RSS), Sangh Parivar, and Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) to alienate non-Hindus or lower-caste Hindus," the USCIRF said. The victims of this campaign include Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Jains, as well as Dalit Hindus, who belong to the lowest rung in the Hindu caste system, the USCIRF said in its latest annual annual report on international religious freedom."