Peter Strzok and Andy McCabe file wrongful termination lawsuits

[Anonymous]

If the Grand Jury had set down an indictment, McCabe would already be indicted. that McCabe has not been indicted means.... (go ahead, connect the dots)

[Anonymous]

Boy, this thread got quiet in a hurry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy prison Andy! I can’t think of a more deserving traitor!

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy prison Andy! I can’t think of a more deserving traitor!

+1

He wasn't even indicted. He will win his wrongful termination lawsuit and recover his pension. +1 means?????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy prison Andy! I can’t think of a more deserving traitor!

+1

He wasn't even indicted. He will win his wrongful termination lawsuit and recover his pension. +1 means?????

Bye Andy! See you in a couple years if you behave in the joint.
I’ll post here when you lose your wrongful termination suit.
Can’t W8.
Maybe don’t lie next time?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy prison Andy! I can’t think of a more deserving traitor!

+1

He wasn't even indicted. He will win his wrongful termination lawsuit and recover his pension. +1 means?????

Bye Andy! See you in a couple years if you behave in the joint.
I’ll post here when you lose your wrongful termination suit.
Can’t W8.
Maybe don’t lie next time?

He. Was. Not. Indicted.

No indictment means no trial, and no jail.

Even the Grand Jury told the Trump administration to pound sand, you can’t fire people because they won’t be your stooges.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy prison Andy! I can’t think of a more deserving traitor!

+1

He wasn't even indicted. He will win his wrongful termination lawsuit and recover his pension. +1 means?????

Bye Andy! See you in a couple years if you behave in the joint.
I’ll post here when you lose your wrongful termination suit.
Can’t W8.
Maybe don’t lie next time?

How can one go to "the joint" if there is no trial? Or are you saying Trump is just going to haul him out of his house in the middle of the night the way Putin just did with his opposition?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy prison Andy! I can’t think of a more deserving traitor!

+1

He wasn't even indicted. He will win his wrongful termination lawsuit and recover his pension. +1 means?????

Bye Andy! See you in a couple years if you behave in the joint.
I’ll post here when you lose your wrongful termination suit.
Can’t W8.
Maybe don’t lie next time?

He. Was. Not. Indicted.

No indictment means no trial, and no jail.

Even the Grand Jury told the Trump administration to pound sand, you can’t fire people because they won’t be your stooges.

Not. Yet. The GJ just met last Thursday. Considering there are other investigations going on, (IG report, Durham's investigation), it is going to take more than one GJ session for them to decide.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy prison Andy! I can’t think of a more deserving traitor!

+1

He wasn't even indicted. He will win his wrongful termination lawsuit and recover his pension. +1 means?????

Bye Andy! See you in a couple years if you behave in the joint.
I’ll post here when you lose your wrongful termination suit.
Can’t W8.
Maybe don’t lie next time?

He. Was. Not. Indicted.

No indictment means no trial, and no jail.

Even the Grand Jury told the Trump administration to pound sand, you can’t fire people because they won’t be your stooges.

Not. Yet. The GJ just met last Thursday. Considering there are other investigations going on, (IG report, Durham's investigation), it is going to take more than one GJ session for them to decide.

Lol. Nope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy prison Andy! I can’t think of a more deserving traitor!

+1

He wasn't even indicted. He will win his wrongful termination lawsuit and recover his pension. +1 means?????

Bye Andy! See you in a couple years if you behave in the joint.
I’ll post here when you lose your wrongful termination suit.
Can’t W8.
Maybe don’t lie next time?

He. Was. Not. Indicted.

No indictment means no trial, and no jail.

Even the Grand Jury told the Trump administration to pound sand, you can’t fire people because they won’t be your stooges.

Not. Yet. The GJ just met last Thursday. Considering there are other investigations going on, (IG report, Durham's investigation), it is going to take more than one GJ session for them to decide.

I don't think you understand how this works.

[Anonymous]

Wait, you mean Russia has its own Trump dossier?

And it involves women Russia used to induce Trump in the 1980's?

Color me shocked.

https://twitter.com/PaulaChertok/status/1173037890135179264

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy prison Andy! I can’t think of a more deserving traitor!

+1

He wasn't even indicted. He will win his wrongful termination lawsuit and recover his pension. +1 means?????

Bye Andy! See you in a couple years if you behave in the joint.
I’ll post here when you lose your wrongful termination suit.
Can’t W8.
Maybe don’t lie next time?

He. Was. Not. Indicted.

No indictment means no trial, and no jail.

Even the Grand Jury told the Trump administration to pound sand, you can’t fire people because they won’t be your stooges.

Not. Yet. The GJ just met last Thursday. Considering there are other investigations going on, (IG report, Durham's investigation), it is going to take more than one GJ session for them to decide.

I don't think you understand how this works.

I agree with pp. Maybe, just maybe, the GJ needs to hear from additional witnesses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy prison Andy! I can’t think of a more deserving traitor!

+1

He wasn't even indicted. He will win his wrongful termination lawsuit and recover his pension. +1 means?????

Bye Andy! See you in a couple years if you behave in the joint.
I’ll post here when you lose your wrongful termination suit.
Can’t W8.
Maybe don’t lie next time?

He. Was. Not. Indicted.

No indictment means no trial, and no jail.

Even the Grand Jury told the Trump administration to pound sand, you can’t fire people because they won’t be your stooges.

Not. Yet. The GJ just met last Thursday. Considering there are other investigations going on, (IG report, Durham's investigation), it is going to take more than one GJ session for them to decide.

I don't think you understand how this works.

I agree with pp. Maybe, just maybe, the GJ needs to hear from additional witnesses.

Again, this is not what happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy prison Andy! I can’t think of a more deserving traitor!

+1

He wasn't even indicted. He will win his wrongful termination lawsuit and recover his pension. +1 means?????

Bye Andy! See you in a couple years if you behave in the joint.
I’ll post here when you lose your wrongful termination suit.
Can’t W8.
Maybe don’t lie next time?

He. Was. Not. Indicted.

No indictment means no trial, and no jail.

Even the Grand Jury told the Trump administration to pound sand, you can’t fire people because they won’t be your stooges.

Not. Yet. The GJ just met last Thursday. Considering there are other investigations going on, (IG report, Durham's investigation), it is going to take more than one GJ session for them to decide.

I don't think you understand how this works.

I agree with pp. Maybe, just maybe, the GJ needs to hear from additional witnesses.

Again, this is not what happened.

Are you on the Grand Jury?????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wait, you mean Russia has its own Trump dossier?

And it involves women Russia used to induce Trump in the 1980's?

Color me shocked.

https://twitter.com/PaulaChertok/status/1173037890135179264

This definitely merits it own thread, friend. Start one!