Once again, it is not the school's job to parent children and I certainly don't want my taxes to go towards therapy for kids when schools are literally falling apart and the teacher/student ratio is too high. You know what is free to the poor? Condoms and birth control. Even abortions are free. Putting kids up for adoption is free too. Abandoning a child at a police station, fire house, or hospital is too. No questions asked. If you are going to have a baby, be ready to raise it. If you going to pop out 5, you better be able to afford them all too. Once again, the school's job is to educate children and they can barely do that at this point. If you feel so strongly about this, I would suggest reaching out to social workers, psychologists, psychiatrists and ask if they can donate their time to work with kids in the school for free. Maybe donate half of your paycheck on this. Ask the public if they would be okay with raising taxes again to support it. Go at it. See how it goes. |
Agree. |
Of course, but that was my point because teachers cannot do anything publicly, parents who are not financially tied to the system yet have a high stake in their children's education, can do a lot IF they can come together as an organized group. It's a matter of putting pressure on the principals, pressure will get them to budge and do the right thing (or risk losing their jobs because they come off as not in control and incompetent). For example, in a situation similar to the one described by the teacher earlier in the thread, the teacher should privately document whatever they can. Many of the kids have also witnessed the events and can and do provide information to the parents. This is primarily how the parents and DCUM, etc. are aware of these things. Parents can then send an organized message to the principal/administration about what was seen and what is being done to address it. It's a matter of numbers; one parent will not sway anyone, but a larger group of them can (and have done it). For example the Haycock Elementary (over in FCPS in VA) PTA/parent group was able to replace a new principal within a matter of months. But there has to be a tight knit community of parents who stand up for their school to start (in Haycock's case the parent group is very active). On the teacher side, I'm confident that if they see a strong group of parents representing the school and speaking out, they will join in to assist whenever they can (subversively if they have to, as to not risk their job). But it absolutely can be done as a team, parents have to initiate it as a group and lead. There is no other way to uproot corruption; it has to be done slowly and targeted to one school at a time whenever large issues affecting learning/teaching pop up at specific school. |
Maybe this is why the BOE likes to mess with the schools so much. We have a CES at our school and it totally affects the sense of community. Kids come and go so it’s definitely not as tight-knit as if it were the same groups of families year after year. |
As a teacher, I really appreciate parents like you. Maybe I've been in the system for too long and have seen too many things happen like this, but in my experience something like this will just come back to bite teachers. The BOE, central office and school administrators will find a way to put it all on teachers. They will NEVER take accountability for putting teachers in this position. They also know how to spin public opinion of teachers so we'll all just wind up looking like uncaring, incompetent, greedy people. It's lose lose because the corruption is so pervasive. I've had the opportunity to be on committees with BOE members in attendance and central office staff serving on the committees. Without fail, they *all* are self-serving and have their own agendas. Every single one of the BOE members have higher political aspirations or other agendas to further their own careers. Central office administrators are also politicians in training. They really don't give a crap about the people working under them, and will absolutely throw teachers under the bus if it means preserving their own agendas. No sweat off their back because they know the public will buy whatever they're selling. Just look at how most of the people on this site write about teachers--MCPS will know exactly how to spin it to turn the public against teachers instead of addressing the root cause of the issue and the corruption surrounding it. |
I agree with you about the admins being the root cause of most of the issues in schools (teachers a very small part by comparison). I also think that by having discussions here on large public forums, and by having parents mobilize, it will educate parents on where the real problems in our schools lie (i.e some teachers not doing a good enough job teaching is small problem compared to the safety and disruption issues brought up on this board). Also, my general impression from reading all these threads is that most parents are already fed up with the school system, (i.e the administration that runs the schools; NOT the teachers). Sure there's some teacher hating due to specific teachers not doing a good job, (and sometimes a few crazy parents), but the overwhelming number of pressing issues brought up on these education forums is with the administration and how schools are run. I think the key fact is that most parents already understand that teachers are no longer in control of their environment and are not allowed to autonomously teach Effectively, teachers do not have a voice and cannot take part in helping run the school or making teaching decisions and they've already experienced that when admins make teaching decisions on their behalf, the results are poor. I agree with you that while almost all high ups are political and prefer the status quo to serving the public, |
I think your description suggests that many teachers have already given up. To me this is sad because it means things will not get any better. But I want to reiterate that most parents have minimal issues with teachers as compared to the administration running the schools. I think this is a fact based on all the data on these boards. This is why parents (not teachers) need to spearhead movements to empower teachers and work for what is right in schools, starting with their own schools. Mobilized parents are the ONLY group that the high ups running the school are afraid of. I don't think you should give up here. I want to come back to my earlier example of Haycock Elementary in VA: One large reason they were able to push out the principal was because many great teachers there did not agree to the types of changes he wanted to enforce (related to watering down excellent programs that had proven themselves over time, etc.). Many veteran teachers spoke out and even announced they would leave. The parent group respected and stood with the teachers on this issue. It is not the principal's right to make a teaching decision on behalf of the teachers and without teacher support. Because they had a good partnership with teachers, the parent group was able to make themselves heard and call out the issues. Now, I realize that this example is pretty ideal and the level of support for teachers combined with driven parents is NOT found at every school, but I don't see why we can't take small steps in that direction for every school. The community (teachers and parents) need to come together as a team, not only because it benefits children and serves the public, but it also can prevent things from slipping from bad to worse at schools. |
I'm a parent and I agree with this 100%. I feel this way for sure. We have had some violent episodes and the teachers have expressed that parents need to go to admin because the teachers felt they had no voice. |
| Haycock PTA was especially effective, I agree. I'm not jealous or spite-filled but schools filled with the offspring of the rich and powerful usually do get what they want. |
| I was a teacher in MCPS and did not get a contract so now I am presently not a teacher. A good teacher needs good classroom management and leadership skills. When they try to manage a classroom so students don't disrespect, misbehave, or get destructive they are labeled as a shit teacher in the review process even if it's working. We take true data but adminisration does not want true data they want fraud numbers so they look good. MCEA will back up this concept because it's about making money off a broken system and telling the first year teachers that they are the ones that broke it. So first year teacher wake up ur fuct before your start if you are a truth teller and a good teacher with morals and consciences. |
OMG yes. You wrote this and I swear this was my experience at least 8 times a year. These enabling parents. |
| I see this too I my school. If a kid has an IEP or is a minority, they don’t seem have many consequences other becoming a BFF with someone in admin or SPEd. |
| Public schools have a nearly impossible task |
You are not making a strong case here for the idea that your brave truth-telling is why you didn't get a contract. |
| You have a great rubber room job teacher bashing. Seriously, you hear teachers letting out very hard truths and the only support you can give is to bash teachers. This sounds like the MCPS rubber room. When principals get in trouble they don't get fired like teacher(who don't even do wrong most of the time)they get promoted to be hacks on teachers. Cases keep coming out of principals who endanger lives and get promoted. |