you are painting with an overly broad brush. not true. |
I may print this out and frame it in my husband's closet. |
"Good parents" want their children and their grandchildren to thrive and succeed, and thus would happily do without a new shiny house/car/etc. |
a lot of "ifs" in this post. this poster is living in la la land, where family means rainbows, unicorns, and no such thing as financial smarts, b/c "we are family." |
I do not think this is about liking or not liking the parents. It just violates some very basic principles regarding money: if it does not make sense to you, and you are paying for it that is a red flag. If it signs you up for a huge debt with a lot of uncertainty about another's health, is it prudent? If there is a death or divorce, what will happen? would you like to be a landlord of a relative? And how would you handle eviction/ non payment? when you set something up that is so disadvantageous to yourself, who will you turn to if something goes awry? what happens if you lose your job and can't make the payments? And the retirees have no money? |
what a bitch you are |
OP maybe you should put this over in Money and Finances. Or better on a money management site. see what they say about this. |
The main reason not to do this deal is RISK. You and your husband are taking all of the risk. So, say your the home cost $100K, inlaws put $20K down. If the market tanks and the home is only worth $50K in a few years (not saying this is going to happen but it could) the inlaws lose $20K, you lose $30K plus the realtor fees.
What if the foundation cracks? Who pays for that? Usually that is the owner. What if the plumbing needs to be replaced or a new roof? You are the one taking on 80% of the risk here. If you and your DH want a rental property then buy a rental. You and DH buying this home because the inlaws "don't want debt" is just ridiculous. |
i love my husband in spite of his parents, not because of them. he turned out well in spite of some really dysfunctional shit. |
older and not wiser. she married their SON. not them. she is not tied or bound to them. |
You've hit the nail on the head but you are ignoring the important red flags the op has raised regarding her dh. He is less than honest and forthcoming about the details. Throw that in the mix and this is a disaster. |
Unfortunately, not everyone we love is worthy of our trust. The parents are being greedy. They want more than they need, and more than they can afford, and they went behind their DIL's back to try to get it. They are also being unrealistic about the financial aspect of this deal. They may be lovely people and not intend to harm their DIL, but they are being greedy and foolish. DIL does not have to indulge them. Love does not mean enabling bad choices. |
Use capitals and maybe we'll take your post seriously. |
ppp I'll take your post seriously because you make a good point. I also can't believe op would consider this risk given that she has children. It is very selfish of the ils to expect this type of help. The ils shouldn't be involving their children in their financial issues. |
I know a family who did this and it's worked out well. Same scenario - husband is an only child with a wife and 2 children. |