It’s extremely hard to raise kids in a nice neighborhood without generational wealth

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The idea that you buy a house in your early 20s...we are Boomers and bought our first $150,000 house in the mid 80s at 35. Interest rates were high and we finally had a down payment. DH was an academic and I was a GS-11.


I think social media has mislead younger people as to what housing was like before they were born, and what was a middle class lifestyle pre 2000.

Most people in their 20s had to have roommates, and lived in small apartments, or at home at their parents house.

Newly married professionals lived in small, modest apartments, until they saved enough to upgrade to a simple modest older house or a townhouse.

We were 2 career professionals in the mid 90s, newly married, and lived in a tiny 2 bedroom apartment for several years, as did all out young professional friends. Nicer houses were not purchased until our mid 30s, after saving for years.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The idea that you buy a house in your early 20s...we are Boomers and bought our first $150,000 house in the mid 80s at 35. Interest rates were high and we finally had a down payment. DH was an academic and I was a GS-11.


I think social media has mislead younger people as to what housing was like before they were born, and what was a middle class lifestyle pre 2000.

Most people in their 20s had to have roommates, and lived in small apartments, or at home at their parents house.

Newly married professionals lived in small, modest apartments, until they saved enough to upgrade to a simple modest older house or a townhouse.

We were 2 career professionals in the mid 90s, newly married, and lived in a tiny 2 bedroom apartment for several years, as did all out young professional friends. Nicer houses were not purchased until our mid 30s, after saving for years.


Not just social media, but HGTV as well. Also, when w bought those cute little older houses, we fixed them up ourselves with paint and modest cosmetic changes until we could afford small, inexpensive kitchen fixes years later.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:7 pages in and everyone is contributing their own version of “screw you, I got mine” while ignoring OP was focused on those under 35 buying $2-3M homes.

We get that many of you saved aggressively and traded up between mid 30s to 50s. You all keep repeating the same story that ironically was only possible for most of you because of unprecedented property appreciation in this country since 2008. Yet you all think you’re brilliant for benefitting from a macroeconomic trend.

How many PP’s bought a $2-3M home under 35 with kids without parental support or a trust in the DC area?


My 28-year-old son and his 27-year-old wife just purchased a $2M home in McLean with $1.2M down and an $800K mortgage. He graduated in 2020 and is currently working as a senior software engineer for Amazon for a cool $350K/year. His wife graduated in 2021 and is currently working for Google for a cool $300K/year. They got married in 2020 and lived with my wife and me for five years to save the $1.2M down payment (with some luck in the stock market) prior to purchasing the home. They plan on paying off the mortgage in the next two years. It is not that difficult.


Do you have a guest house? It would be a cold day in hell that I would agree to live with my in laws or future daughter or son in law. Share a kitchen, family room, and laundry room? Have sex with them down the hallway?


They lived in our guest house, which features a full kitchen, family room, and laundry room. Fortunately, we spend our winters in Florida and Vietnam and travel extensively between spring and fall, so we really only saw them during the summer. FWIW, I get along great with my daughter-in-law; she has actually been my younger daughter's best friend since first grade.



This is the funniest possible contribution to try to negate the premise that you need generational wealth to pull off what your son and DIL pulled off. "You don't need generational wealth! Just live for five years rent free in your parents' guest house with a full kitchen, family room, and laundry room, conveniently located near your top-3%-salary duel jobs! It just takes those kind of 'good decisions,' not generational wealth!"

I mean, if this is a troll it's why trolling was invented. Chef's kiss.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:7 pages in and everyone is contributing their own version of “screw you, I got mine” while ignoring OP was focused on those under 35 buying $2-3M homes.

We get that many of you saved aggressively and traded up between mid 30s to 50s. You all keep repeating the same story that ironically was only possible for most of you because of unprecedented property appreciation in this country since 2008. Yet you all think you’re brilliant for benefitting from a macroeconomic trend.

How many PP’s bought a $2-3M home under 35 with kids without parental support or a trust in the DC area?


My 28-year-old son and his 27-year-old wife just purchased a $2M home in McLean with $1.2M down and an $800K mortgage. He graduated in 2020 and is currently working as a senior software engineer for Amazon for a cool $350K/year. His wife graduated in 2021 and is currently working for Google for a cool $300K/year. They got married in 2020 and lived with my wife and me for five years to save the $1.2M down payment (with some luck in the stock market) prior to purchasing the home. They plan on paying off the mortgage in the next two years. It is not that difficult.


Sounds like a piece of cake!


it is, with the right life choices around employment, having children, and saving vs spending. All actions have consequences, some more favorable than others. And, people prefer different things, which is also fine, so they make different choices. None of it necessarily depends on "generational wealth", though.


Getting two FAANG jobs straight out of school and having parents with a literal guest house in a major city is not something anywhere close to a “piece of cake.” And if you think access to a guest house in a major city isn’t tapping generational wealth, you’re out of your mind.


You're extrapolating from one anecdote. Plenty of young physicians, BigLaw attorneys, and entrepreneurs who saved diligently and limited their family size have expensive homes at relatively young ages, all without generational wealth paying for anything. If you obtained an education which qualified you for only low income employment, or if you spend wantonly, you're not going to be in that group. If you have a large family at a young age, fail to save and invest diligently, or engage in other asset-sapping behaviors, you're not going to be in that group.


Two big law attorneys married to each other are not buying a $2-$3 million house as their first home unless they have generational wealth. Why? They typically have at least 400k combined in loans. And they're usually not graduating from law school until they're 28. Starting salaries in big law are still much lower than your FAANG child's salary (250k first years vs. 350k). HHI of 500k-600k plus 400k in loans cannot afford a $2 million house.

Source: Am biglaw.


I didn’t have any law school debt (thanks mom and dad), and one big law salary plus another similar salary was enough to buy the equivalent of $1.5m
house twenty years ago after only a few years of working, renting and saving. Also, I was 25, as were my closest friends, when I graduated law school.


You also benefitted from generational wealth! You (and your generation) also benefitted from lower educational and housing costs (controlled for inflation).

Most T14 students have at least 2 years between undergrad and law school. At Michigan, for example, the average entering age is 24.6. Most people are graduating at 27-28. Then a good chunk take a clerkship (where the pay isn't great). Then you start in biglaw as a second year at 30 making 275k (including bonus).

If you borrow the entire cost of your T14 education, you'll graduate with around 400k in debt. If you choose a standard repayment plan with a ten-year term, you'll pay $5,000 a month servicing your debt. And it would be idiotic to only pay down the minimum, especially if your goal is to buy a house. If you had two biglaw incomes and wanted to live really frugally, it would still take ages to save up the 500k down payment. You take home after the minimum debt payment is only $9,500. Subtract necessary expenses for a 1BR apartment, utilities, food, clothing (for work), medical, emergencies, and it would likely take you at least 5 years making only minimum debt payments to save 500k for a down payment on a $2 million house on TWO biglaw salaries.

So no, it is not reasonably possible to buy a $2-3 million house in your early 30s, even with biglaw, without generational wealth. Fortunately, there are many other excellent houses you can buy in this area for far less.


It is possible actually. I went to a T14 and got a merit scholarship that covered 200k. My parents helped me with groceries in law school - about $150 a month. They make under 150k. I graduated law school at 24 (turned 25 the summer after law school).

I paid off 100k very quickly within 2.5 years. Saved aggressively almost my entire big law income while living off my DH’s non-lawyer income (140k in our mid 20s, 200k by our 30s). Covid ramped up our savings significantly because all of our disposable income for travel, eating out, etc went to savings. By the time we were early 30s (I was 6 years into big law by then and making 500k), we had saved more than enough for a 20% down payment and bought our forever home for 2M.

It’s certainly not common but it is doable without generational wealth.


Did you find it risky having a $1.5M mortgage on $700K HHI given your salary would likely decrease if you didn’t stay in big law / make partner?

We make $700-800K early 30s but even with 20% down we are too worried about job security / getting paid this much for another 20-30 years to jump on a $2M+ home.

If we had rich parents who could bail us out or the entire mortgage balance in an account where we could pay off the mortgage in case of job loss we’d do it but right now it feels too risky until we accumulate a lot more savings.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:7 pages in and everyone is contributing their own version of “screw you, I got mine” while ignoring OP was focused on those under 35 buying $2-3M homes.

We get that many of you saved aggressively and traded up between mid 30s to 50s. You all keep repeating the same story that ironically was only possible for most of you because of unprecedented property appreciation in this country since 2008. Yet you all think you’re brilliant for benefitting from a macroeconomic trend.

How many PP’s bought a $2-3M home under 35 with kids without parental support or a trust in the DC area?


My 28-year-old son and his 27-year-old wife just purchased a $2M home in McLean with $1.2M down and an $800K mortgage. He graduated in 2020 and is currently working as a senior software engineer for Amazon for a cool $350K/year. His wife graduated in 2021 and is currently working for Google for a cool $300K/year. They got married in 2020 and lived with my wife and me for five years to save the $1.2M down payment (with some luck in the stock market) prior to purchasing the home. They plan on paying off the mortgage in the next two years. It is not that difficult.


Sounds like a piece of cake!


it is, with the right life choices around employment, having children, and saving vs spending. All actions have consequences, some more favorable than others. And, people prefer different things, which is also fine, so they make different choices. None of it necessarily depends on "generational wealth", though.


Getting two FAANG jobs straight out of school and having parents with a literal guest house in a major city is not something anywhere close to a “piece of cake.” And if you think access to a guest house in a major city isn’t tapping generational wealth, you’re out of your mind.


You're extrapolating from one anecdote. Plenty of young physicians, BigLaw attorneys, and entrepreneurs who saved diligently and limited their family size have expensive homes at relatively young ages, all without generational wealth paying for anything. If you obtained an education which qualified you for only low income employment, or if you spend wantonly, you're not going to be in that group. If you have a large family at a young age, fail to save and invest diligently, or engage in other asset-sapping behaviors, you're not going to be in that group.


Two big law attorneys married to each other are not buying a $2-$3 million house as their first home unless they have generational wealth. Why? They typically have at least 400k combined in loans. And they're usually not graduating from law school until they're 28. Starting salaries in big law are still much lower than your FAANG child's salary (250k first years vs. 350k). HHI of 500k-600k plus 400k in loans cannot afford a $2 million house.

Source: Am biglaw.


I didn’t have any law school debt (thanks mom and dad), and one big law salary plus another similar salary was enough to buy the equivalent of $1.5m
house twenty years ago after only a few years of working, renting and saving. Also, I was 25, as were my closest friends, when I graduated law school.


You also benefitted from generational wealth! You (and your generation) also benefitted from lower educational and housing costs (controlled for inflation).

Most T14 students have at least 2 years between undergrad and law school. At Michigan, for example, the average entering age is 24.6. Most people are graduating at 27-28. Then a good chunk take a clerkship (where the pay isn't great). Then you start in biglaw as a second year at 30 making 275k (including bonus).

If you borrow the entire cost of your T14 education, you'll graduate with around 400k in debt. If you choose a standard repayment plan with a ten-year term, you'll pay $5,000 a month servicing your debt. And it would be idiotic to only pay down the minimum, especially if your goal is to buy a house. If you had two biglaw incomes and wanted to live really frugally, it would still take ages to save up the 500k down payment. You take home after the minimum debt payment is only $9,500. Subtract necessary expenses for a 1BR apartment, utilities, food, clothing (for work), medical, emergencies, and it would likely take you at least 5 years making only minimum debt payments to save 500k for a down payment on a $2 million house on TWO biglaw salaries.

So no, it is not reasonably possible to buy a $2-3 million house in your early 30s, even with biglaw, without generational wealth. Fortunately, there are many other excellent houses you can buy in this area for far less.


It is possible actually. I went to a T14 and got a merit scholarship that covered 200k. My parents helped me with groceries in law school - about $150 a month. They make under 150k. I graduated law school at 24 (turned 25 the summer after law school).

I paid off 100k very quickly within 2.5 years. Saved aggressively almost my entire big law income while living off my DH’s non-lawyer income (140k in our mid 20s, 200k by our 30s). Covid ramped up our savings significantly because all of our disposable income for travel, eating out, etc went to savings. By the time we were early 30s (I was 6 years into big law by then and making 500k), we had saved more than enough for a 20% down payment and bought our forever home for 2M.

It’s certainly not common but it is doable without generational wealth.


Did you find it risky having a $1.5M mortgage on $700K HHI given your salary would likely decrease if you didn’t stay in big law / make partner?

We make $700-800K early 30s but even with 20% down we are too worried about job security / getting paid this much for another 20-30 years to jump on a $2M+ home.

If we had rich parents who could bail us out or the entire mortgage balance in an account where we could pay off the mortgage in case of job loss we’d do it but right now it feels too risky until we accumulate a lot more savings.


We took out a huge mortgage under similar circumstances. DH was much more comfortable about it than I was. I dealt with my stress by increasing my savings to cover the new debt load. I started with the goal of having one year of expenses in my brokerage account, which I kept in cash, and I'm now continuing to save at the same rate while taking on more risk. Knowing you could cover the mortgage for several years if you need to sell due to a job change or loss is helpful. I would've preferred a modest mortgage, but marriage.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:7 pages in and everyone is contributing their own version of “screw you, I got mine” while ignoring OP was focused on those under 35 buying $2-3M homes.

We get that many of you saved aggressively and traded up between mid 30s to 50s. You all keep repeating the same story that ironically was only possible for most of you because of unprecedented property appreciation in this country since 2008. Yet you all think you’re brilliant for benefitting from a macroeconomic trend.

How many PP’s bought a $2-3M home under 35 with kids without parental support or a trust in the DC area?


My 28-year-old son and his 27-year-old wife just purchased a $2M home in McLean with $1.2M down and an $800K mortgage. He graduated in 2020 and is currently working as a senior software engineer for Amazon for a cool $350K/year. His wife graduated in 2021 and is currently working for Google for a cool $300K/year. They got married in 2020 and lived with my wife and me for five years to save the $1.2M down payment (with some luck in the stock market) prior to purchasing the home. They plan on paying off the mortgage in the next two years. It is not that difficult.


Sounds like a piece of cake!


it is, with the right life choices around employment, having children, and saving vs spending. All actions have consequences, some more favorable than others. And, people prefer different things, which is also fine, so they make different choices. None of it necessarily depends on "generational wealth", though.


Getting two FAANG jobs straight out of school and having parents with a literal guest house in a major city is not something anywhere close to a “piece of cake.” And if you think access to a guest house in a major city isn’t tapping generational wealth, you’re out of your mind.


You're extrapolating from one anecdote. Plenty of young physicians, BigLaw attorneys, and entrepreneurs who saved diligently and limited their family size have expensive homes at relatively young ages, all without generational wealth paying for anything. If you obtained an education which qualified you for only low income employment, or if you spend wantonly, you're not going to be in that group. If you have a large family at a young age, fail to save and invest diligently, or engage in other asset-sapping behaviors, you're not going to be in that group.


Two big law attorneys married to each other are not buying a $2-$3 million house as their first home unless they have generational wealth. Why? They typically have at least 400k combined in loans. And they're usually not graduating from law school until they're 28. Starting salaries in big law are still much lower than your FAANG child's salary (250k first years vs. 350k). HHI of 500k-600k plus 400k in loans cannot afford a $2 million house.

Source: Am biglaw.


I didn’t have any law school debt (thanks mom and dad), and one big law salary plus another similar salary was enough to buy the equivalent of $1.5m
house twenty years ago after only a few years of working, renting and saving. Also, I was 25, as were my closest friends, when I graduated law school.


You also benefitted from generational wealth! You (and your generation) also benefitted from lower educational and housing costs (controlled for inflation).

Most T14 students have at least 2 years between undergrad and law school. At Michigan, for example, the average entering age is 24.6. Most people are graduating at 27-28. Then a good chunk take a clerkship (where the pay isn't great). Then you start in biglaw as a second year at 30 making 275k (including bonus).

If you borrow the entire cost of your T14 education, you'll graduate with around 400k in debt. If you choose a standard repayment plan with a ten-year term, you'll pay $5,000 a month servicing your debt. And it would be idiotic to only pay down the minimum, especially if your goal is to buy a house. If you had two biglaw incomes and wanted to live really frugally, it would still take ages to save up the 500k down payment. You take home after the minimum debt payment is only $9,500. Subtract necessary expenses for a 1BR apartment, utilities, food, clothing (for work), medical, emergencies, and it would likely take you at least 5 years making only minimum debt payments to save 500k for a down payment on a $2 million house on TWO biglaw salaries.

So no, it is not reasonably possible to buy a $2-3 million house in your early 30s, even with biglaw, without generational wealth. Fortunately, there are many other excellent houses you can buy in this area for far less.


It is possible actually. I went to a T14 and got a merit scholarship that covered 200k. My parents helped me with groceries in law school - about $150 a month. They make under 150k. I graduated law school at 24 (turned 25 the summer after law school).

I paid off 100k very quickly within 2.5 years. Saved aggressively almost my entire big law income while living off my DH’s non-lawyer income (140k in our mid 20s, 200k by our 30s). Covid ramped up our savings significantly because all of our disposable income for travel, eating out, etc went to savings. By the time we were early 30s (I was 6 years into big law by then and making 500k), we had saved more than enough for a 20% down payment and bought our forever home for 2M.

It’s certainly not common but it is doable without generational wealth.


Did you find it risky having a $1.5M mortgage on $700K HHI given your salary would likely decrease if you didn’t stay in big law / make partner?

We make $700-800K early 30s but even with 20% down we are too worried about job security / getting paid this much for another 20-30 years to jump on a $2M+ home.

If we had rich parents who could bail us out or the entire mortgage balance in an account where we could pay off the mortgage in case of job loss we’d do it but right now it feels too risky until we accumulate a lot more savings.


NP but we had similar income early 40s (10 years ago), decided to do a $1.5m house with the expectation/acceptance that either of us could get booted from our jobs at any time. Ten years later, our combined is well over $2m, but we still always assume that in our 50s these careers and salaries could disappear into thin air, or at best a recession could make these salaries dicey, and i'd rather sleep at night knowing that i could lose my job and become a bon bon eating empty nest homemaker in my 50s if it came to it.
Anonymous
We bought our first home in North Arlington in 1990 for $250k. It wasn't large as McLean and Bethesda homes go, but it was handsome, had 4BRs and 2.5 baths, was an easy walk to metro, and was in a top school pyramid.

I was a junior associate in Biglaw and my spouse stayed home with the kids. I probably made $75k a year at the time. My in laws lent us 20k to cover most of the down payment and we paid them back.

The Redfin estimate for the house is now $1.3 million. A second year associate now makes about $250k.

So the house back then cost about three times my salary, and today would cost about five times my salary.

That sums up pretty well how times have changed.
Anonymous
I live in Bethesda in the Whitman district in a nice 4 BR/3 BA house that we renovated top to bottom. It is worth around $1.6m. You don't need to spend $2-3m on a house.

Our first house was in Bethesda but was a tiny split level (since torn down). It was fine with 1 kid but started to feel small with 2 kids. But like some others have posted we bought what we could comfortably afford and were fine with not living in an HGTV showhouse.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The idea that you buy a house in your early 20s...we are Boomers and bought our first $150,000 house in the mid 80s at 35. Interest rates were high and we finally had a down payment. DH was an academic and I was a GS-11.


I think social media has mislead younger people as to what housing was like before they were born, and what was a middle class lifestyle pre 2000.

Most people in their 20s had to have roommates, and lived in small apartments, or at home at their parents house.

Newly married professionals lived in small, modest apartments, until they saved enough to upgrade to a simple modest older house or a townhouse.

We were 2 career professionals in the mid 90s, newly married, and lived in a tiny 2 bedroom apartment for several years, as did all out young professional friends. Nicer houses were not purchased until our mid 30s, after saving for years.

In 1989 the median age of a home buyer was 31 and now it’s 56. The median first time home buyer is now 40.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The idea that you buy a house in your early 20s...we are Boomers and bought our first $150,000 house in the mid 80s at 35. Interest rates were high and we finally had a down payment. DH was an academic and I was a GS-11.


I think social media has mislead younger people as to what housing was like before they were born, and what was a middle class lifestyle pre 2000.

Most people in their 20s had to have roommates, and lived in small apartments, or at home at their parents house.

Newly married professionals lived in small, modest apartments, until they saved enough to upgrade to a simple modest older house or a townhouse.

We were 2 career professionals in the mid 90s, newly married, and lived in a tiny 2 bedroom apartment for several years, as did all out young professional friends. Nicer houses were not purchased until our mid 30s, after saving for years.

In 1989 the median age of a home buyer was 31 and now it’s 56. The median first time home buyer is now 40.


Some of that shift is due to the population pyramid being far different than it was in 1989. Not all obviously, but a good portion. Our average age in this country is something like six years older. Which is a crazy incrase in such a short time. There aren't nearly as many young people relative to old as there used to be.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I live in Springfield, VA, my kids run around my neighborhood like it's 1985, and our school is great. People's standards have changed. I wouldn't want to live in Mclean or Bethesda.


We do have generational wealth and our kids have 7 figure accounts. The whole point of generation skipping and other estate plans are to not be greedy and spend all your money on oversized houses and six figure cars. It’s to pass what you can off to the next generation.

We live in a similar neighborhood and were never interested in living in an expensive neighborhood. Too many people are uptight and filled with boring people in those neighborhoods . The only thing worse would be to live in a gated community that has HOA. Nightmare

Nobody knows who lives where and why. Don’t worry about how people got to where they are.
Anonymous
I live in McLean and wouldn't have opted for McLean had it not been the shortest commute option for me. My neighbors are nice and schools are good but there are plenty of other neighborhoods offering good schools and nice neighbors. I don't understand the obsession with McLean, Bethesda etc.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's possible, we did it. You have to delay kids to your mid to late 30's to give yourself time to save and invest for a house in Mclean. Most younger people are blowing money on stupid stuff like Starbucks, fake nails, tattoos, travel,


meh. We met in college, got married soon after graduation and had two kids by the time
we were 28. Bought our first house at 23 and our 2nd inside the beltway in NOVA by age 26. Combining incomes and having parents who paid for college and cars we had for years for both of us was a huge leg up. We are now 48, careers in full swing near career peak and one kid who has graduated college and well employed and another who is mid college, starting our family early was a big bonus.
Anonymous
DH and I lived in apartments/rental houses until we were early 30s and had our first child. Then we bought a small townhouse. We stayed there until our kids were 10 and 12 and we moved to our first SFH in a cheaper area when we were in our mid-40s. Last year. It can still be done, it's just that you can't live in McLean while doing it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's possible, we did it. You have to delay kids to your mid to late 30's to give yourself time to save and invest for a house in Mclean. Most younger people are blowing money on stupid stuff like Starbucks, fake nails, tattoos, travel,


meh. We met in college, got married soon after graduation and had two kids by the time
we were 28. Bought our first house at 23 and our 2nd inside the beltway in NOVA by age 26. Combining incomes and having parents who paid for college and cars we had for years for both of us was a huge leg up. We are now 48, careers in full swing near career peak and one kid who has graduated college and well employed and another who is mid college, starting our family early was a big bonus.


Generational wealth
post reply Forum Index » Money and Finances
Message Quick Reply
Go to: