Will Wake ever be in the #30s again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t all that long ago that US News categorized WF as a regional school, and when it first was recategorized as national it was nowhere near the top 30. What goes around comes around.

Honestly, let’s get serious: does anyone really think WF is anywhere near as strong as UVA or UNC? Nope.

Sorry to break it to you but UVA is nowhere near UNC. And yes I would consider WF similar to UVA - they’re both solid in academics but not amazing.

+1

Wake, BC, UVA, Tufts, all peers schools, maybe throw in USC as well. I don’t think the so-called Wake boosters are arguing differently. Not sure why UNC is seen as a tier above. It’s harder than UVA for oos admittance by a good measure, but far easier for in state admission.

Wake has double the admission rate of the other schools you listed.

Wake’s admit rate is 21 percent. BC and UVA are a few points lower. USC doesn’t count spring admits and guaranteed transfers in its rate, neither of which Wake has.

BC’s admission rate is 14%
UVA’s admission rate is 18%

I don’t think you can directly compare admit rates. You need to compare things that are the same prices. For example, if the OOS tuition for UVA is the same as WF tuition then you could compare. But if kids are picking UVA in state because it’s a half or a quarter of the price then that’s not a reflection on perceived quality of the college. The question is where do families choose to go when they are spending a certain amount of money. All things being equal, I’d send my kids to WF any day rather than UVA and I’m sure that the vast majority of the country would do the same.

I don't have a dog in this fight, but plenty of people would pick UVA over WF...it's kind of nuts to claim the vast majority would pick WF. The campus is meh...Winston Salem is a fairly depressing town so adds no value to WF (other than I guess an airport...though not sure people actually fly into that airport)..school is fine, but isn't tops in anything.

UVA had 42,540 OOS applicants for 5,530 OOS slots last year vs 17,500 total applications to Wake Forest for 3,600 slots. Considering OOS tuition for UVA for business and engineering tops $90k/year (and it's $78k for other majors), seems like in fact more OOS kids are interested in attending UVA vs. WF.

In NC, it's Duke and UNC Chapel Hill.

That's it.

WF is an afterthought.

What a myopic view! There are about 20 other colleges in NC including NC State, Davidson, etc. . . But I guess it makes you feel better about yourself to make comments like this

Davidson is a great LAC. That has a better rep than WF too.

You keep writing as if we care about your opinion. . .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t all that long ago that US News categorized WF as a regional school, and when it first was recategorized as national it was nowhere near the top 30. What goes around comes around.

Honestly, let’s get serious: does anyone really think WF is anywhere near as strong as UVA or UNC? Nope.

Sorry to break it to you but UVA is nowhere near UNC. And yes I would consider WF similar to UVA - they’re both solid in academics but not amazing.

+1

Wake, BC, UVA, Tufts, all peers schools, maybe throw in USC as well. I don’t think the so-called Wake boosters are arguing differently. Not sure why UNC is seen as a tier above. It’s harder than UVA for oos admittance by a good measure, but far easier for in state admission.

Wake has double the admission rate of the other schools you listed.

Wake’s admit rate is 21 percent. BC and UVA are a few points lower. USC doesn’t count spring admits and guaranteed transfers in its rate, neither of which Wake has.

BC’s admission rate is 14%
UVA’s admission rate is 18%

I don’t think you can directly compare admit rates. You need to compare things that are the same prices. For example, if the OOS tuition for UVA is the same as WF tuition then you could compare. But if kids are picking UVA in state because it’s a half or a quarter of the price then that’s not a reflection on perceived quality of the college. The question is where do families choose to go when they are spending a certain amount of money. All things being equal, I’d send my kids to WF any day rather than UVA and I’m sure that the vast majority of the country would do the same.

I don't have a dog in this fight, but plenty of people would pick UVA over WF...it's kind of nuts to claim the vast majority would pick WF. The campus is meh...Winston Salem is a fairly depressing town so adds no value to WF (other than I guess an airport...though not sure people actually fly into that airport)..school is fine, but isn't tops in anything.

UVA had 42,540 OOS applicants for 5,530 OOS slots last year vs 17,500 total applications to Wake Forest for 3,600 slots. Considering OOS tuition for UVA for business and engineering tops $90k/year (and it's $78k for other majors), seems like in fact more OOS kids are interested in attending UVA vs. WF.

In NC, it's Duke and UNC Chapel Hill.

That's it.

WF is an afterthought.

What a myopic view! There are about 20 other colleges in NC including NC State, Davidson, etc. . . But I guess it makes you feel better about yourself to make comments like this

Davidson is a great LAC. That has a better rep than WF too.

You keep writing as if we care about your opinion. . .

Feel free to ignore, but of course, you did not.

You must be an insecure WF alumn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t all that long ago that US News categorized WF as a regional school, and when it first was recategorized as national it was nowhere near the top 30. What goes around comes around.

Honestly, let’s get serious: does anyone really think WF is anywhere near as strong as UVA or UNC? Nope.

Sorry to break it to you but UVA is nowhere near UNC. And yes I would consider WF similar to UVA - they’re both solid in academics but not amazing.

+1

Wake, BC, UVA, Tufts, all peers schools, maybe throw in USC as well. I don’t think the so-called Wake boosters are arguing differently. Not sure why UNC is seen as a tier above. It’s harder than UVA for oos admittance by a good measure, but far easier for in state admission.

Wake has double the admission rate of the other schools you listed.

Wake’s admit rate is 21 percent. BC and UVA are a few points lower. USC doesn’t count spring admits and guaranteed transfers in its rate, neither of which Wake has.

BC’s admission rate is 14%
UVA’s admission rate is 18%

I don’t think you can directly compare admit rates. You need to compare things that are the same prices. For example, if the OOS tuition for UVA is the same as WF tuition then you could compare. But if kids are picking UVA in state because it’s a half or a quarter of the price then that’s not a reflection on perceived quality of the college. The question is where do families choose to go when they are spending a certain amount of money. All things being equal, I’d send my kids to WF any day rather than UVA and I’m sure that the vast majority of the country would do the same.

I don't have a dog in this fight, but plenty of people would pick UVA over WF...it's kind of nuts to claim the vast majority would pick WF. The campus is meh...Winston Salem is a fairly depressing town so adds no value to WF (other than I guess an airport...though not sure people actually fly into that airport)..school is fine, but isn't tops in anything.

UVA had 42,540 OOS applicants for 5,530 OOS slots last year vs 17,500 total applications to Wake Forest for 3,600 slots. Considering OOS tuition for UVA for business and engineering tops $90k/year (and it's $78k for other majors), seems like in fact more OOS kids are interested in attending UVA vs. WF.

In NC, it's Duke and UNC Chapel Hill.

That's it.

WF is an afterthought.

What a myopic view! There are about 20 other colleges in NC including NC State, Davidson, etc. . . But I guess it makes you feel better about yourself to make comments like this

Davidson is a great LAC. That has a better rep than WF too.

You keep writing as if we care about your opinion. . .

Feel free to ignore, but of course, you did not.

You must be an insecure WF alumn.

Nope, just not interesting your attempts to make yourself feel better about yourself with your constant negativity and pretentiousness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t all that long ago that US News categorized WF as a regional school, and when it first was recategorized as national it was nowhere near the top 30. What goes around comes around.

Honestly, let’s get serious: does anyone really think WF is anywhere near as strong as UVA or UNC? Nope.

Sorry to break it to you but UVA is nowhere near UNC. And yes I would consider WF similar to UVA - they’re both solid in academics but not amazing.

+1

Wake, BC, UVA, Tufts, all peers schools, maybe throw in USC as well. I don’t think the so-called Wake boosters are arguing differently. Not sure why UNC is seen as a tier above. It’s harder than UVA for oos admittance by a good measure, but far easier for in state admission.

Wake has double the admission rate of the other schools you listed.

Wake’s admit rate is 21 percent. BC and UVA are a few points lower. USC doesn’t count spring admits and guaranteed transfers in its rate, neither of which Wake has.

BC’s admission rate is 14%
UVA’s admission rate is 18%

I don’t think you can directly compare admit rates. You need to compare things that are the same prices. For example, if the OOS tuition for UVA is the same as WF tuition then you could compare. But if kids are picking UVA in state because it’s a half or a quarter of the price then that’s not a reflection on perceived quality of the college. The question is where do families choose to go when they are spending a certain amount of money. All things being equal, I’d send my kids to WF any day rather than UVA and I’m sure that the vast majority of the country would do the same.

I don't have a dog in this fight, but plenty of people would pick UVA over WF...it's kind of nuts to claim the vast majority would pick WF. The campus is meh...Winston Salem is a fairly depressing town so adds no value to WF (other than I guess an airport...though not sure people actually fly into that airport)..school is fine, but isn't tops in anything.

UVA had 42,540 OOS applicants for 5,530 OOS slots last year vs 17,500 total applications to Wake Forest for 3,600 slots. Considering OOS tuition for UVA for business and engineering tops $90k/year (and it's $78k for other majors), seems like in fact more OOS kids are interested in attending UVA vs. WF.

In NC, it's Duke and UNC Chapel Hill.

That's it.

WF is an afterthought.

What a myopic view! There are about 20 other colleges in NC including NC State, Davidson, etc. . . But I guess it makes you feel better about yourself to make comments like this

Davidson is a great LAC. That has a better rep than WF too.

You keep writing as if we care about your opinion. . .

Feel free to ignore, but of course, you did not.

You must be an insecure WF alumn.

DP. Sour grapes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t all that long ago that US News categorized WF as a regional school, and when it first was recategorized as national it was nowhere near the top 30. What goes around comes around.

Honestly, let’s get serious: does anyone really think WF is anywhere near as strong as UVA or UNC? Nope.

Sorry to break it to you but UVA is nowhere near UNC. And yes I would consider WF similar to UVA - they’re both solid in academics but not amazing.

+1

Wake, BC, UVA, Tufts, all peers schools, maybe throw in USC as well. I don’t think the so-called Wake boosters are arguing differently. Not sure why UNC is seen as a tier above. It’s harder than UVA for oos admittance by a good measure, but far easier for in state admission.

Wake has double the admission rate of the other schools you listed.

Wake’s admit rate is 21 percent. BC and UVA are a few points lower. USC doesn’t count spring admits and guaranteed transfers in its rate, neither of which Wake has.

BC’s admission rate is 14%
UVA’s admission rate is 18%

I don’t think you can directly compare admit rates. You need to compare things that are the same prices. For example, if the OOS tuition for UVA is the same as WF tuition then you could compare. But if kids are picking UVA in state because it’s a half or a quarter of the price then that’s not a reflection on perceived quality of the college. The question is where do families choose to go when they are spending a certain amount of money. All things being equal, I’d send my kids to WF any day rather than UVA and I’m sure that the vast majority of the country would do the same.

I hate to break it to you, but a majority of the country has never even heard of Wake Forest.

+1

Tim Duncan played there. He was good!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t all that long ago that US News categorized WF as a regional school, and when it first was recategorized as national it was nowhere near the top 30. What goes around comes around.

Honestly, let’s get serious: does anyone really think WF is anywhere near as strong as UVA or UNC? Nope.

Sorry to break it to you but UVA is nowhere near UNC. And yes I would consider WF similar to UVA - they’re both solid in academics but not amazing.

+1

Wake, BC, UVA, Tufts, all peers schools, maybe throw in USC as well. I don’t think the so-called Wake boosters are arguing differently. Not sure why UNC is seen as a tier above. It’s harder than UVA for oos admittance by a good measure, but far easier for in state admission.

Wake has double the admission rate of the other schools you listed.

Wake’s admit rate is 21 percent. BC and UVA are a few points lower. USC doesn’t count spring admits and guaranteed transfers in its rate, neither of which Wake has.

BC’s admission rate is 14%
UVA’s admission rate is 18%

I don’t think you can directly compare admit rates. You need to compare things that are the same prices. For example, if the OOS tuition for UVA is the same as WF tuition then you could compare. But if kids are picking UVA in state because it’s a half or a quarter of the price then that’s not a reflection on perceived quality of the college. The question is where do families choose to go when they are spending a certain amount of money. All things being equal, I’d send my kids to WF any day rather than UVA and I’m sure that the vast majority of the country would do the same.

I hate to break it to you, but a majority of the country has never even heard of Wake Forest.

+1

Tim Duncan played there. He was good!

The majority of people probably haven't heard of Williams or Amherst either. The general public is dumb AF.

[Anonymous]

No

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t all that long ago that US News categorized WF as a regional school, and when it first was recategorized as national it was nowhere near the top 30. What goes around comes around.

Honestly, let’s get serious: does anyone really think WF is anywhere near as strong as UVA or UNC? Nope.

Sorry to break it to you but UVA is nowhere near UNC. And yes I would consider WF similar to UVA - they’re both solid in academics but not amazing.

+1

Wake, BC, UVA, Tufts, all peers schools, maybe throw in USC as well. I don’t think the so-called Wake boosters are arguing differently. Not sure why UNC is seen as a tier above. It’s harder than UVA for oos admittance by a good measure, but far easier for in state admission.

Wake has double the admission rate of the other schools you listed.

Wake’s admit rate is 21 percent. BC and UVA are a few points lower. USC doesn’t count spring admits and guaranteed transfers in its rate, neither of which Wake has.

BC’s admission rate is 14%
UVA’s admission rate is 18%

I don’t think you can directly compare admit rates. You need to compare things that are the same prices. For example, if the OOS tuition for UVA is the same as WF tuition then you could compare. But if kids are picking UVA in state because it’s a half or a quarter of the price then that’s not a reflection on perceived quality of the college. The question is where do families choose to go when they are spending a certain amount of money. All things being equal, I’d send my kids to WF any day rather than UVA and I’m sure that the vast majority of the country would do the same.

I hate to break it to you, but a majority of the country has never even heard of Wake Forest.

+1

Tim Duncan played there. He was good!

The majority of people probably haven't heard of Williams or Amherst either. The general public is dumb AF.

The majority of people don’t know most of the ivies either. People know their Alma mater, Harvard, and a few cool football schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t all that long ago that US News categorized WF as a regional school, and when it first was recategorized as national it was nowhere near the top 30. What goes around comes around.

Honestly, let’s get serious: does anyone really think WF is anywhere near as strong as UVA or UNC? Nope.

Sorry to break it to you but UVA is nowhere near UNC. And yes I would consider WF similar to UVA - they’re both solid in academics but not amazing.

+1

Wake, BC, UVA, Tufts, all peers schools, maybe throw in USC as well. I don’t think the so-called Wake boosters are arguing differently. Not sure why UNC is seen as a tier above. It’s harder than UVA for oos admittance by a good measure, but far easier for in state admission.

Wake has double the admission rate of the other schools you listed.

Wake’s admit rate is 21 percent. BC and UVA are a few points lower. USC doesn’t count spring admits and guaranteed transfers in its rate, neither of which Wake has.

BC’s admission rate is 14%
UVA’s admission rate is 18%

I don’t think you can directly compare admit rates. You need to compare things that are the same prices. For example, if the OOS tuition for UVA is the same as WF tuition then you could compare. But if kids are picking UVA in state because it’s a half or a quarter of the price then that’s not a reflection on perceived quality of the college. The question is where do families choose to go when they are spending a certain amount of money. All things being equal, I’d send my kids to WF any day rather than UVA and I’m sure that the vast majority of the country would do the same.

I hate to break it to you, but a majority of the country has never even heard of Wake Forest.

+1

Tim Duncan played there. He was good!

As did Chris Paul, who is apparently currently playing for the Spurs, the team Duncan played for his whole career

[Anonymous]

No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t all that long ago that US News categorized WF as a regional school, and when it first was recategorized as national it was nowhere near the top 30. What goes around comes around.

Honestly, let’s get serious: does anyone really think WF is anywhere near as strong as UVA or UNC? Nope.

Sorry to break it to you but UVA is nowhere near UNC. And yes I would consider WF similar to UVA - they’re both solid in academics but not amazing.

+1

Wake, BC, UVA, Tufts, all peers schools, maybe throw in USC as well. I don’t think the so-called Wake boosters are arguing differently. Not sure why UNC is seen as a tier above. It’s harder than UVA for oos admittance by a good measure, but far easier for in state admission.

Wake has double the admission rate of the other schools you listed.

Wake’s admit rate is 21 percent. BC and UVA are a few points lower. USC doesn’t count spring admits and guaranteed transfers in its rate, neither of which Wake has.

BC’s admission rate is 14%
UVA’s admission rate is 18%

I don’t think you can directly compare admit rates. You need to compare things that are the same prices. For example, if the OOS tuition for UVA is the same as WF tuition then you could compare. But if kids are picking UVA in state because it’s a half or a quarter of the price then that’s not a reflection on perceived quality of the college. The question is where do families choose to go when they are spending a certain amount of money. All things being equal, I’d send my kids to WF any day rather than UVA and I’m sure that the vast majority of the country would do the same.

I hate to break it to you, but a majority of the country has never even heard of Wake Forest.

+1

Tim Duncan played there. He was good!

The majority of people probably haven't heard of Williams or Amherst either. The general public is dumb AF.

This last sentence 100%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:damn looks like we now have emory,
NE and Wake into the category of overpriced overrated privates

Couldn't get into Emory?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:damn looks like we now have emory,
NE and Wake into the category of overpriced overrated privates

Don't forget Tulane.

You not being able to afford these colleges is a you problem, not a we problem. And Emory is far from overrated.

[Anonymous]

Wake, Emory, Tulane, W&M all hurt in the USNWR rating changes will continue to be sought after by parents and students who want a quality education free from the protests of the day and social justice warrior dynamic.

Hopefully they will remain true to their roots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:damn looks like we now have emory,
NE and Wake into the category of overpriced overrated privates

Don't forget Tulane.

You not being able to afford these colleges is a you problem, not a we problem. And Emory is far from overrated.

Ah, the Emory booster is back. I'm quite able to send my kids to any school they choose. Overrated schools like Tulane and Emory aren't the least bit appealing to them (not to mention, WF and NE). So sorry.