Community college professor? Yes, straight math problems logically can be biased, especially in the way they are taught in schools. Think critically just a little. Hope you're not one of my children's professors. But they're both students with LDs at top 20 universities, so I'm guessing not. |
But this is exactly why schools like Tulane will stay test-optional forever. |
So they are class biased and class skews by race? What’s the difference ? |
The SAT is less biased than letters of rec, sports, activities, and GPA. It is one of the least biased parts of an application. |
+1 The standardized testing industry is a racket. And get rid of super scoring. |
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I mean, obviously. The test optional thing was a weird experiment and there is no evidence that it accomplished anything useful, and some evidence it was genuinely detrimental. Good riddance.
Being good at taking tests is not the most important thing in life and everyone should remind themselves of that. But it turns out that people who do test well, and are able to get very high scores on college preparedness tests, tend to also do best in college, where they will also be expected to regularly take tests. It's okay that not everyone goes to an Ivy, or becomes a lawyer or doctor or academic or MBA or whatever. It's not the only option in life.[/quote] Just realize that Harvard isn't going to accept your kids with a 1580 over one with a 1500 based on the SAT alone. They will consider them "the same"/made the cut, and then look at everything else. I don't think requiring tests will have the effect most "high stats" parents want. Fact is T20 schools only want to see your kid meet a baseline for the testing, then they still want to look at everything else. A 1600 doesn't differentiate your kid from a 1520 kid really. These schools will still be highly rejective. [/quote] I think everyone knows this. What they object to is a 1300 SAT kid who hides that score, goes TO and gets in on some 'woke' quota. Hopefully this fixes that![/quote] Woke quota?! Omg I never cease to be amazed by the things that people will actually say (type). [b]Do you assume that the URM students that you see have lower scores? [/b]How racist.[/quote] I assume the bolded is true because, in fact, this is exactly what Harvard's own data showed in the discovery portion of the SCt case[/quote] Not only is the PP is who too short on vocabulary to express what they're trying to say a jerk, but they're also flat-out wrong. In fact, the reinstatement of test scores is so they CAN let in students with lower scores. Maybe 1300 will be a little low, but not, they can see that students with high GPAs from little-known or underperforming schools are capable of doing the work at their universities--and 1400 SAT scores prove that. All this narrative about the highest scores doing "the best" in college really doesn't matter. Students with 1400 scores and high GPAs from their high schools deserve an opportunity to have an excellent education. They don't have to be top students in the Ivy League, they just deserve the chance. Reinstatement of test scores allows that to happen. Again, understand, this is not to put a barrier in front of students with lower scores who were "hiding" them. It is to remove it. [/quote] Thank you, thank you for this explanation. I thought this decision threw my DD’s chances way back but hopefully not. |
DP, why the snark of throwing around community college as an insult and looking down at them? Give an example of a straight math problem that can be biased. Not sure what you were trying to demonstrate bringing up your LD kids at “top 20” colleges. |
Standardized testing fits the need for independent and uniform across the nation evaluation and to combat rampant grade inflation. Why is standardized testing more biased than grades for example? |
The southern flagship schools that stayed test required and dumped huge merit amounts into high stat/high SAT out of state students played this game very well and are now calling checkmate on the ivies and northern schoos thwt jumped on the test optional bandwagon. |
Studies have show that a high SAT score is indicative of how well a student will perform in college. The UC study found exactly this. That's why schools like MIT and Caltech, others, and now Harvard are bringing back tests. |
With digital SAT, test-takers receive different questions. Everyone takes his/her own test. So it is not standardized the way it was in the past. But go on thinking it still is and feel free to continue regurgitating your ancient talking points. |
Again, think a little, and maybe you can make some conclusions on your own. Standardized tests, straight math, most of US style of teaching, are biased. This is not even arguable. It's not accessible to all. |
My 2023 and 2024 kids had plenty of opportunities to take and retake the SAT over most of their high school years. The only graduating years that should have been test optional was class of 2021. Instead, they doubled down on test optional, and ended up with a bunch of kids from the "you get an A if you login to most of your classes and do this quizlet" generation with school shut-down inflated grades, lack of skills needed for rigorous classes, and no impartial SAT to show whether or not they possessed the intellect to overcome the significant deficiencies of their pandemic "school" years. |
Your kid has the opportunity to take an SAT at least 3 times before they start on college applications. It is not too late at all. |
+100 |