Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are they celebrating Mother’s Day in March? Is that England’s date?

Do you or do you not know how to Google? It took you time to type those sentences and check the thread than it would to LOOK IT UP!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Their PR team is so terrible. Who thought it was a good idea to post this pic? They need to hire a PR firm that’s lead by an America.

they really do. I am not even one of the conspiracy people but why in the world would you release a picture that looks like this? This isn't helping at all.

What am I missing from this crop?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is clearly an old photo

The article said William took it earlier in the week.

Yes, dear. “The article” said. Not “…took it earlier in the week, according to Palace sources,” or “…according to His Royal Highness.” If it is an error, it is 100% an error that can happen any day with any new source. If it were posted to Instagram and they pulled it, they should have said “was posted on Instagram earlier this week” or something. There’s no source to the “fact” that the photo was actually TAKEN in recent days.

Instagram post says <camera emoji> 2024

I like how you act like Instagram is held to the same journalistic and archival standards as, say, a legitimate newspaper, or Getty Images, or the official the BRF press offices.

oh dear. I am pointing out that there are explicit efforts made by someone acting on behalf of William and Kate to make us all believe, purport, put forth, assert what have you, that this picture was taken in the last 2 months and 10 days. I am not saying that it's true.

But her legs are rigid and place and she looks paralyzed. Or are you totally confused? Which is it?

I think that the picture of Kate may have been taken this week and the kids were photoshopped in. I think that none of it adds up. George in particular looks so much more "little boy" than at Christmas

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts? Take a look at the timeline

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy_commons/s/NSYTYviOFS

https://tomsiebert.substack.com/p/the-strange-case-of-kate-middleton

Oooh, this timeline was really helpful in understanding what all the fuss is about! VERY intriguing!

Very much so! What a rabbit hole!

The ambulance at Sandringham was news to me, as is the assertion that the children haven't been seen since Christmas, either. Is that true? Have them been out of school, or does the writer just mean that they haven't made any official public appearances? That part was unclear.

I don’t think they’ve been seen in public? Or at least nobody has captured pictures of them in public.

I’m not familiar with where they go to school, but is it someplace secluded where they public can’t see in at all?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts? Take a look at the timeline

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy_commons/s/NSYTYviOFS

https://tomsiebert.substack.com/p/the-strange-case-of-kate-middleton

Oooh, this timeline was really helpful in understanding what all the fuss is about! VERY intriguing!

Very much so! What a rabbit hole!

The ambulance at Sandringham was news to me, as is the assertion that the children haven't been seen since Christmas, either. Is that true? Have them been out of school, or does the writer just mean that they haven't made any official public appearances? That part was unclear.

I don’t think they’ve been seen in public? Or at least nobody has captured pictures of them in public.

I’m not familiar with where they go to school, but is it someplace secluded where they public can’t see in at all?

If a stranger posted this about your children, you would be calling the police to file a report about a stalker. Get a life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts? Take a look at the timeline

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy_commons/s/NSYTYviOFS

https://tomsiebert.substack.com/p/the-strange-case-of-kate-middleton

Oooh, this timeline was really helpful in understanding what all the fuss is about! VERY intriguing!

Very much so! What a rabbit hole!

The ambulance at Sandringham was news to me, as is the assertion that the children haven't been seen since Christmas, either. Is that true? Have them been out of school, or does the writer just mean that they haven't made any official public appearances? That part was unclear.

I don’t think they’ve been seen in public? Or at least nobody has captured pictures of them in public.

I’m not familiar with where they go to school, but is it someplace secluded where they public can’t see in at all?

If a stranger posted this about your children, you would be calling the police to file a report about a stalker. Get a life.

The children are public figures. Get over yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw the picture and immediately thought “this woman is paralyzed”. The way her legs look and the bend at her waist look like that of a paraplegic. Abdominal surgery or not, why couldn’t she STAND for a couple pictures MONTHS after surgery? She’s a spry young mother! Something is up.

Would she be smiling? I can’t imagine she’s paralyzed - seems a stretch. Kids would be distressed too

That photo of her head is not taken the same day as the kids – just look at the lighting!

I think she is just in Charlotte’s shadow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts? Take a look at the timeline

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy_commons/s/NSYTYviOFS

https://tomsiebert.substack.com/p/the-strange-case-of-kate-middleton

Oooh, this timeline was really helpful in understanding what all the fuss is about! VERY intriguing!

Very much so! What a rabbit hole!

The ambulance at Sandringham was news to me, as is the assertion that the children haven't been seen since Christmas, either. Is that true? Have them been out of school, or does the writer just mean that they haven't made any official public appearances? That part was unclear.

I don’t think they’ve been seen in public? Or at least nobody has captured pictures of them in public.

I’m not familiar with where they go to school, but is it someplace secluded where they public can’t see in at all?

If a stranger posted this about your children, you would be calling the police to file a report about a stalker. Get a life.

I’m asking a question. WHY haven’t they been seen? I remember when William and Harry would have their pictures taken in little backpacks on their way to school. George and Charlotte, too. So it stands to reason that IF they could be seen heading to school, they would have been? Unless they attend some private, gated school somewhere where they couldn’t be seen entering or exiting. Or they are homeschooled. I don’t know?

[Anonymous]

If that link with the timeline is accurate, it sounds like something happened on Dec 28, a medical emergency that required an ambulance.

"December 28 - An ambulance with police escort leaves Sandringham, where the Royal Family spends Christmas every annum. There was no coverage of this in the corporate media, but there were tweets with photographs and video from Royal obsessives documenting the event. No statement from the Royal Family about why there was an ambulance and police at the estate, nor their destination."

If that is the case, then Kensington Palace's statement on Jan 17 that she had a pre-planned abdominal surgery is accurate. It's just that it was planned based on the Dec 28 medical incident.

Super interesting that no one visited her for the 2 weeks she was at the hospital (William only 1x). This to me suggests some sort of rehab - either for mental health, ED or whatever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is clearly an old photo

The article said William took it earlier in the week.

Yes, dear. “The article” said. Not “…took it earlier in the week, according to Palace sources,” or “…according to His Royal Highness.” If it is an error, it is 100% an error that can happen any day with any new source. If it were posted to Instagram and they pulled it, they should have said “was posted on Instagram earlier this week” or something. There’s no source to the “fact” that the photo was actually TAKEN in recent days.

Instagram post says <camera emoji> 2024

I like how you act like Instagram is held to the same journalistic and archival standards as, say, a legitimate newspaper, or Getty Images, or the official the BRF press offices.

oh dear. I am pointing out that there are explicit efforts made by someone acting on behalf of William and Kate to make us all believe, purport, put forth, assert what have you, that this picture was taken in the last 2 months and 10 days. I am not saying that it's true.

But her legs are rigid and place and she looks paralyzed. Or are you totally confused? Which is it?

I think that the picture of Kate may have been taken this week and the kids were photoshopped in. I think that none of it adds up. George in particular looks so much more "little boy" than at Christmas

You mean the black and white pic from Christmas? George looked really serious in that pic. I think the pic William posted is more recent. They don’t really look younger to me but because they are laughing in this pic maybe that’s why they seem younger?

[Anonymous]

I think it’s pretty clear that it’s an old photo. The Royals post non-contemporaneous photos all the time on their social media.

Except, this time, they tried to make a point of say “hey this pic was taken by William this week! 📸 “ which they don’t normally do. It just highlights the fib in their post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts? Take a look at the timeline

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy_commons/s/NSYTYviOFS

https://tomsiebert.substack.com/p/the-strange-case-of-kate-middleton

Oooh, this timeline was really helpful in understanding what all the fuss is about! VERY intriguing!

Very much so! What a rabbit hole!

The ambulance at Sandringham was news to me, as is the assertion that the children haven't been seen since Christmas, either. Is that true? Have them been out of school, or does the writer just mean that they haven't made any official public appearances? That part was unclear.

I don’t think they’ve been seen in public? Or at least nobody has captured pictures of them in public.

I’m not familiar with where they go to school, but is it someplace secluded where they public can’t see in at all?

If a stranger posted this about your children, you would be calling the police to file a report about a stalker. Get a life.

I'm the PP who asked about the children. I don't want the children stalked and think they should be left alone. I only wanted to know if the kids had been pulled out of school since Christmas because that would be a pretty big deal if true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s pretty clear that it’s an old photo. The Royals post non-contemporaneous photos all the time on their social media.

Except, this time, they tried to make a point of say “hey this pic was taken by William this week! 📸 “ which they don’t normally do. It just highlights the fib in their post.

It’s so bizarre. It’s like everything they do recently leaves people questioning everything. Something awful must truly be going on for them to be so avoidant. Why not just air it all out so people will leave it alone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Their PR team is so terrible. Who thought it was a good idea to post this pic? They need to hire a PR firm that’s lead by an America.

they really do. I am not even one of the conspiracy people but why in the world would you release a picture that looks like this? This isn't helping at all.

What am I missing from this crop?

it's Charlotte's sleeve. The bottom part of it is disappearing. It's definitely an altered picture that's been done terribly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Their PR team is so terrible. Who thought it was a good idea to post this pic? They need to hire a PR firm that’s lead by an America.

they really do. I am not even one of the conspiracy people but why in the world would you release a picture that looks like this? This isn't helping at all.

What am I missing from this crop?

it's Charlotte's sleeve. The bottom part of it is disappearing. It's definitely an altered picture that's been done terribly

You’re honestly insane.